Community Forums => General-3 => Topic started by: Crimm on September 26, 2007, 05:01:54 PM
Title: Jack Thompson: TOO HOT FOR TV
Post by: Crimm on September 26, 2007, 05:01:54 PM
I like my litigation with a side of man on man porn.
Title: RE:Jack Thompson: TOO HOT FOR TV
Post by: S-U-P-E-R on September 26, 2007, 05:11:27 PM
Ahahah, I thought it was going to be completely relevant to the case, but it wasn't, maybe only vaguely:
Quote To the extent that the other attorney’s alleged conduct is in any way relevant… there was no need for Mr. Thompson to file these graphic images in the public record. A simple reference to the website and its alleged links would have sufficed…
lol.
Title: RE: Jack Thompson: TOO HOT FOR TV
Post by: HadesGigas on September 26, 2007, 11:28:19 PM
I hope he had his kid buy the gayporn like he did with the M-rated games at Best Buy.
Title: RE: Jack Thompson: TOO HOT FOR TV
Post by: KDR_11k on September 27, 2007, 12:07:32 AM
"Goatse is NOT evidence!"
Title: RE: Jack Thompson: TOO HOT FOR TV
Post by: nitsu niflheim on September 27, 2007, 04:41:49 AM
It was probably his personal collection and he accidentally submitted it with his brief.
Title: RE:Jack Thompson: TOO HOT FOR TV
Post by: Crimm on September 27, 2007, 06:04:27 AM
I like that he did it to shame one of his perceived opponents, who he accuses of "making adult images available to children." By putting it in a court brief it was made available to everyone as part of public record.
Haha, idiot.
Title: RE:Jack Thompson: TOO HOT FOR TV
Post by: Djunknown on September 27, 2007, 04:17:21 PM
Quote I’m not the one in trouble. The judge found a certain lawyer’s material obscene. I absolutely love it. This is the best thing to happen to me in a long, long time. Check my [case] filings, sweetie.
