Gaming Forums => Nintendo Gaming => Topic started by: NeoLego on March 24, 2003, 02:46:59 AM
Title: Gotta Catch Them All...???
Post by: NeoLego on March 24, 2003, 02:46:59 AM
Hello everyone. This is my first time on the boards, though I've been reading them for a while. This hasn't been brought up as far as I know, but I wanted to see what you guys thought? I love PokeMon, it's one of the reasons that I have kept my GBC back in the day. Now I would never part with R/S or my SP I feel a little let down. Where is Bulbasaur? Charmander? Squrtile? Pidgeotto? Lugia? and I could go on and on. Now, maybe I have missed something and these PokeMon can be found somewhere/somehow, but if I'm correct WHY? I have played though 5 hours so far and finally got a "GeoDude" I like Mudkip, but other than that I'm not real happy with the PokeMon. I dunno, maybe it's just me. I just thought I'd put this out there. Thanks for readin. neo
Title: Gotta Catch Them All...???
Post by: PIAC on March 24, 2003, 08:14:38 AM
you can get all 380? odd pokemon, just not directly, hopefully you have a gamecube and can get pokemon gcn when it comes out, all the missing ones can be found on there i think
another poster could probably elaborate more so
Title: Gotta Catch Them All...???
Post by: Harmonix on March 24, 2003, 09:06:32 AM
Gamefaqs.com provides a list of all pokemon unavailable to pokemon r/s players, it consists of practically al the pokemon from previous instalments of the series. My suspicion is that to obtain the new pokemon one will need to BUY cards o use through the ecard reader and therefore unlock the pokemon. If pokemon ruby and silver are as popular as their predecssors then nintendo stand to make a hell of a lot of money through pokemon cards alone! If this is the case, I personally will be quite annoyed, to get the most from pokemon i dont wanna have to fork out loads for an e card reader and then loads more for loads of crumby pokemon cards (that i think are lame).
Title: Gotta Catch Them All...???
Post by: Bloodworth on March 24, 2003, 09:21:53 AM
This has been addressed several times already. Please see related threads.
