Post by: ShyGuy on July 17, 2007, 09:20:33 AM
Quote
All right you haters, 32 player FPS action is coming to the Wii, and you're gonna like it!
Press Release:
http://home.businesswire.com/portal/site/google/index.jsp?ndmViewId=news_view&newsId=20070717006032&newsLang=en
Youtube briefly showing in game footage
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-h7bT0UKx4s
EXTRA CRISPY MEGA-ING POST
Medal of Honor Heroes 2 is an "EA sequel" (TM) to Medal of Honor Heroes, a PSP only title that
got a C average on GameRankings. Not to be confused with Medal of Honor Vanguard, which was the first MOH game for the Wii and was decent despite being a WWII shooter and being very, very short (like five foot two)
Anyways (Hi Karl's favorite phrase) This game can be split into three game play types: Single Player, Arcade, and Onrine Multiplayer (32!)
Single Player involves an OSS operative (the precursor to the CIA, go watch the Good Shepherd and fall asleep after twenty minutes) He runs around Europe sabotoging the Nazi regime and shooting large amounts of said Nazis. I'm sure we've played similar levels a thousand times before, but the controls are supposed to make it fresh and new again.
Arcade is in the flavor of Area51 or Virtua Cop where the camera moves around and you shoot people. Impressions seem to give this mode a thumbs up, so it may be fantastic fun. I should mention that the game is designed to work with the Zapper, but everyone seems to hate it.
Online Is what I am most excited about and I can't wait to shoot real live people! (this is what we call a warning sign) It's 32, ahem, THIRTY TWO person online and you can join in the battles at anytime. This is very exciting and I hope the big games don't get totally killed by lag. I look forward to playing against you all. Oh! I almost forgot the best part. It doesn't use friend codes, but instead something called EA nation.
Reviews
IGN - Bozon gives it a 8.4, Matt agrees
Gamespot - A suprising 8.0 from teh haters
Teh Pix!
Look How much better it looks than the PSP (stealth troll)
I'm not gonna bother with wasting more bandwidth so go check out more pictures at The official EA site
Disclaimer This game has been judged IMMORAL by senior NWR staff, so I don't recommend playing it.
Post by: GoldenPhoenix on July 17, 2007, 09:23:10 AM
Post by: Mashiro on July 17, 2007, 09:24:29 AM
CONFIRMED ~_^
This is good news and I knew about it since E3 of course but still it's good news and opens to gateway for more online FPS games for the Wii.
Post by: GoldenPhoenix on July 17, 2007, 09:27:45 AM
Post by: j_moose on July 17, 2007, 10:41:04 AM
Definately a game that I'm going to be following.
Post by: Kairon on July 17, 2007, 11:10:37 AM
... You know, I just realized that the trifecta of Nintendo specifically outing RE:UC, Ghost Squad, and MoH, is like a little nugget of hardcore gaming (not to mention third party) drive we've overlooked. Is Nintendo aggressively pursuing light-gun games as a portion of its get non-gamers to play real games strategy?
Post by: NinGurl69 *huggles on July 17, 2007, 03:26:26 PM
Post by: j_moose on July 17, 2007, 03:35:54 PM
Quote
Originally posted by: Kairon
And I doubt they'd include voice chat... not only would that seem to be Nintendo progressing faster than usual on the hardcore gaming front, but voice chat just brings up so many dangers and concerns and ways to turn non-gamers (and real gamers, I don't wanna listen to 12-year olds yelling at their mothers for chocolate milk) off to the whole thing.
I agree that it would seem odd to have something like that from Nintendo at this point - but that's something I definately wouldn't complain about. Sure there are drawbacks to voice chat (listening to a 12 year old playing Halo 2 explain why Jigglypuff was the best Pokemon comes to mind)...but if it can be turned off (or muted through a headset) then at least there's a choice there. I don't think it would turn non-gamers off (though clearly I can't speak from that perspective) as much as it would be a nice option for those who would like to add a little more to the experience.
Post by: IceCold on July 17, 2007, 04:07:37 PM
Post by: j_moose on July 17, 2007, 07:05:05 PM
Post by: ShyGuy on July 17, 2007, 09:18:56 PM
Post by: Infernal Monkey on July 18, 2007, 03:25:16 PM
Post by: Mashiro on July 20, 2007, 03:03:22 AM
Post by: ShyGuy on August 16, 2007, 03:11:11 PM
Notable Quotables:
EA Nation 32 player online confirmed. NO FRIEND CODES
No local Split Screen multiplayer
An extra mission for the Wii version over PSP for both of the single player modes (wait, is the on-rails part a separate set of missions?)
Post by: Caliban on August 16, 2007, 05:02:08 PM
Post by: Infernal Monkey on August 16, 2007, 05:31:13 PM
Quote
No local Split Screen multiplayer
That doesn't seem very smart! =(
Post by: ShyGuy on August 16, 2007, 08:08:13 PM
Post by: NinGurl69 *huggles on August 16, 2007, 08:55:42 PM
"No local Split Screen multiplayer"
Wii just isn't good enough to do what Mario Kart 64 did.
Post by: NWR_insanolord on August 18, 2007, 10:16:49 AM
I've got to hand it to EA, they've done a damn good job so far on the Wii, far better than any other third-party. EA gets a lot of crap from so-called "hardcore" gamers, but they've put real effort into their Wii projects, a lot of which would have been easy to shoehorn the standard controls into the Wiimote/'chuck, but they have actually innovated and done some great stuff so far. Keep up the good work! (also, if EA is still publishing games from Free Radical, I would really like it if they could "strongly suggest" that they give me a TimeSplitters game on the Wii)
Post by: Kairon on August 18, 2007, 12:31:35 PM
Post by: NWR_insanolord on August 18, 2007, 12:37:06 PM
Post by: ShyGuy on August 18, 2007, 01:59:05 PM
Post by: UERD on August 18, 2007, 02:23:20 PM
Quote
I've got to hand it to EA, they've done a damn good job so far on the Wii, far better than any other third-party. EA gets a lot of crap from so-called "hardcore" gamers, but they've put real effort into their Wii projects, a lot of which would have been easy to shoehorn the standard controls into the Wiimote/'chuck, but they have actually innovated and done some great stuff so far. Keep up the good work! (also, if EA is still publishing games from Free Radical, I would really like it if they could "strongly suggest" that they give me a TimeSplitters game on the Wii)
To be honest, Boogie was kind of a risk for EA in the first place. I'm as cynical as the next guy, but I'm actually willing to give them the benefit of the doubt when it comes to trying new things with the Wii. They're making somewhat of an effort, and I think they'll eventually get it right.
If the controls work right, I'll probably pick up a copy.
Post by: Kairon on August 18, 2007, 02:42:08 PM
BUT ANYWAYS...
I'm looking forward to Medal of Honor Heroes 2 quite a bit actually, but I'm concerned about the lack of info we have just 3-5 months away from release, assuming that the tentative november/fall 07 release date holds up. Not to mention I like FPS' as simple, guilty pleasures.
I'm actually UBER excited about playing the game rail-shooter/arcade/casual/zapper style, it seems a unique and interesting addition and it just makes me thirst for more zapper information even more. Add in the friendcode-less server based EA Nation multiplayer, and whether or not this game comes out this fall or gets delayed, I'm definitely making it a priority.
Post by: NWR_insanolord on August 18, 2007, 03:24:37 PM
Post by: Terranigma Freak on August 21, 2007, 01:12:27 AM
Post by: NinGurl69 *huggles on August 21, 2007, 09:06:33 AM
They're taking a step back IN STYLE.
Post by: Kairon on August 21, 2007, 09:32:18 AM
Quote
We also feature full support of the Zapper in all of our game modes, including multiplayer.
Post by: NinGurl69 *huggles on August 21, 2007, 10:18:29 AM
Post by: ShyGuy on August 30, 2007, 07:50:42 PM
- Not a mere PSP port
- Controls are second only to Metroid.
- Rails mode controls better than Umbrella Chronicles.
- Graphics are improved from MOH VanGuard.
Post by: Kairon on August 30, 2007, 08:25:57 PM
Third parties are trying finally.
Quote
did we think that a third party could make a game that would rival Corruption's innovative utilization of the Wii remote? We said sure, yes, absolutely, it was bound to happen eventually, but we honestly figured such a feat would be several months off, if not years.
...
What the demo also proves beyond any doubt is that the Wii rendition is absolutely not a quick and dirty PSP port and we hope all of our readers will take notice now because, frankly, this surprisingly adept undertaking is set to blow a hole through both Call of Duty and Vanguard before it.
...
team members have periodically checked the message boards through the title's development cycle and are always disheartened when posters assert that Heroes 2 will be dumbed down mechanically or graphically on Wii. Sure, he adds, the two versions are bound to share some commonalities, like enemy artificial intelligence, for instance (which he notes is very smart), but Heroes 2 on Wii is brought to life via a new game engine, vastly improved graphics, completely overhauled controls and even a few exclusive play modes.
-60 FPS.
-fully customizable sensitivities
-can turn around in 0.5 seconds if you like
-options for "easy lock-on", even in Multiplayer matches
-appropriate weapon-specific cool wiimote moves, like swinging large machine guns left and right ala dodging in Wii Boxing
-480p and 16:9
Nintendo Wii owners everywhere, please buy this game!
Post by: bustin98 on August 30, 2007, 09:24:22 PM
I was one of those peeps who answered a questionaire about this game. I wonder if it made any difference...
Post by: GoldenPhoenix on August 30, 2007, 09:27:35 PM
Post by: Kairon on August 30, 2007, 09:37:15 PM
Medal of Honor Airborne for the 360 and other platforms is being developed by EALA, who were the bit of EA involved with Vanguard.
Post by: GoldenPhoenix on August 30, 2007, 09:38:38 PM
Quote
Originally posted by: Kairon
This is made by a different team though, EA Canada, which we all know as one of EA's studios that is focusing very heavily on the Wii.
Medal of Honor Airborne for the 360 and other platforms is being developed by EALA, who were the bit of EA involved with Vanguard.
Well I'll consider, but I have SO MUCH I need to get. Heck I still haven't even played Scarface and I played Madden 08 for like 2 hrs.
Post by: Kairon on August 30, 2007, 09:44:22 PM
Post by: ShyGuy on August 31, 2007, 03:47:18 AM
Post by: ShyGuy on September 06, 2007, 11:26:41 AM
Post by: Stogi on September 06, 2007, 03:37:07 PM
Post by: ShyGuy on September 08, 2007, 04:09:51 PM
http://www.destructoid.com/hands-on-medal-of-honor-heroes-2-42911.phtml
anti-aliasing CONFIRMED
aiming is responsive and sensitive.
two goals: nails the controls, make the best game in terms of visuals they can on the Wii.
Post by: UERD on September 08, 2007, 04:39:41 PM
I wonder what infernal force, however, has compelled EA to attempt making solid, compelling games for the Wii instead of the standard shovelware. I tell you the truth, nothing good can come out of this development! :P
Post by: darknight06 on September 09, 2007, 02:01:40 AM
Post by: Kenology on September 09, 2007, 03:15:15 AM
But after reading IGN's hands-on, learning about the online mode, and reading through this thread, I can say that I'm pretty much sold.
The fact that this thing controls as well as MP3:C and has an online multiplayer mode really goes a long way. The guys up at EA Canada are really putting some effort into this and I want it to do well.
Post by: ShyGuy on September 09, 2007, 04:48:24 AM
Okay, here's the catch: It's currently scheduled to come out the same week as Super Mario Galaxy.
Post by: IceCold on September 09, 2007, 09:06:41 AM
EDIT: There's a reason why EA's games are some of the best third party ones on the Wii. The few EA games I liked pre-Wii were EA Canada's games (SSX, NBA Street, Fight Night, FIFA etc). The fact that the Wii versions of many of their games are being made by a group from EA Canada was great news from the start, and it looks like it's paying off.
Post by: darknight06 on September 09, 2007, 02:02:49 PM
Post by: IceCold on September 09, 2007, 03:58:04 PM
Post by: ShyGuy on September 12, 2007, 01:08:38 PM
Post by: Kenology on September 12, 2007, 03:46:46 PM
Post by: BlackNMild2k1 on September 12, 2007, 05:15:31 PM
Too bad it will have to wait until SMG and SSBB get put down long enough to remember that the game came out.
Post by: ShyGuy on September 12, 2007, 05:17:17 PM
Post by: Kenology on September 13, 2007, 12:37:19 AM
Post by: Terranigma Freak on September 13, 2007, 02:44:43 AM
Post by: ShyGuy on September 13, 2007, 04:41:07 AM
Post by: BlackNMild2k1 on September 13, 2007, 04:49:35 AM
Quote
Originally posted by: ShyGuy
Yeah the water looks bad but the explosions look decent. My biggest pet peeve is the belt bullet feeding into the machine gun isn't animated.
Well, that settles it, I withdraw my interest from the game now. sale -1
Post by: darknight06 on September 13, 2007, 08:49:26 AM
Post by: GoldenPhoenix on September 14, 2007, 05:16:48 AM
Post by: Kenology on September 14, 2007, 05:18:47 AM
I say we all commemorate our purchase by having a NWR deathmatch online!
Post by: Mashiro on September 14, 2007, 11:26:25 AM
Quote
Originally posted by: GoldenPhoenix
So how many here and going to feel dirty and immoral for buying this game? I say give me GTA, that game is super moral!
I have no interest in taking joy in war games so . . . I won't be buying this game =)
Post by: NWR_insanolord on September 14, 2007, 11:43:41 AM
Post by: GoldenPhoenix on September 14, 2007, 11:57:18 AM
Quote
Originally posted by: MashiroQuote
Originally posted by: GoldenPhoenix
So how many here and going to feel dirty and immoral for buying this game? I say give me GTA, that game is super moral!
I have no interest in taking joy in war games so . . . I won't be buying this game =)
Metroid Prime 3 is a war game of sorts so you PHAIL.
Post by: ShyGuy on September 14, 2007, 12:00:16 PM
Post by: GoldenPhoenix on September 14, 2007, 12:11:08 PM
Post by: Mashiro on September 14, 2007, 12:31:33 PM
And GP phails for taking everything out of context =)
Edit: ACTUALLY GP, you PHAIL for not realizing the remnants of battles and the destruction they bring are more than prevalent in MP3. Many dead Galactic Federation bodies remain and their reason of death is revealed upon scanning them.
Post by: GoldenPhoenix on September 14, 2007, 12:35:13 PM
Quote
Originally posted by: Mashiro
I've never liked those sorts of games anyway, sorry Shyguy.
And GP phails for taking everything out of context =)
Edit: ACTUALLY GP, you PHAIL for not realizing the remnants of battles and the destruction they bring are more than prevalent in MP3. Many dead Galactic Federation bodies remain and their reason of death is revealed upon scanning them.
But all those poor aliens you are slaughtering, they get no respect, there deaths are quick and simplistic. As we know in the real world death is much more disturbing, so in turn Metroid Prime 3 is disrespecting what real death is like.
Post by: Mashiro on September 14, 2007, 12:40:40 PM
Quote
I wouldn't go as far to say it is unethical, but I would say it is disrespectful to make an entertaining game out of something which subject matter is anything but.
War is war. It isn't make believe, it isn't fairy tales, it isn't made up games of people fighting in space. War games based on actual wars that fail to show the true grittiness and hellishness of war should not be made.
There ya go.
Post by: GoldenPhoenix on September 14, 2007, 12:44:25 PM
Post by: Mashiro on September 14, 2007, 12:48:03 PM
The topic of discussion (well which should be MoH2 Heros. . .) or more to the point my opinion is that games based on real said events (in this case WWII) which do not accurately depict the battles at hand and the true suffering and hell of war is disrespectful to those who served.
Just my 2 cents.
Edit for your edit: There is a big difference between real events and fake events.
Post by: GoldenPhoenix on September 14, 2007, 12:51:04 PM
Quote
Originally posted by: Mashiro
That's not the topic at hand now is it?
The topic of discussion (well which should be MoH2 Heros. . .) or more to the point my opinion is that games based on real said events (in this case WWII) which do not accurately depict the battles at hand and the true suffering and hell of war is disrespectful to those who served.
Just my 2 cents.
And how might you depict true suffering through a game? With a standard like that it is virtually impossible unless you built a holodeck. Regardless if a game/poem/movie/play/story inspires someone to research further into the event, that is not disrespect but opening the doors to deeper understanding.
Post by: Mashiro on September 14, 2007, 12:53:34 PM
Post by: GoldenPhoenix on September 14, 2007, 12:55:28 PM
Quote
Originally posted by: Mashiro
Maybe make something like how Saving Private Ryan is and there ya go.
So a visual representation is true suffering? I'm sorry but the only way you are going to portray that is by actually INVOLVING the person physically in something like that, otherwise it is an impossible standard. Maybe the game should also let you rape an individual, because without that then it woudln't be a true representation of war, because that stuff goes on all the time. Then guess what? The game would be rated AO and no one would get to play it, brilliant! That is the way to teach people about war, make in inaccessible for most individuals. Heck at the very least "respectful" games to war would be rated M, closing the door on underage buyers, which in turn could be turning away individuals that may find something of interest and, yes, respect what happened there.
Post by: Mashiro on September 14, 2007, 01:34:12 PM
Quote
So a visual representation is true suffering?
Many scenes in saving private ryan scared the ever loving crap out of me and certainly make me never ever want to be a part of a war . . .
Quote
Maybe the game should also let you rape an individual, because without that then it woudln't be a true representation of war, because that stuff goes on all the time. Then guess what? The game would be rated AO and no one would get to play it, brilliant! That is the way to teach people about war, make in inaccessible for most individuals. Heck at the very least "respectful" games to war would be rated M, closing the door on underage buyers, which in turn could be turning away individuals that may find something of interest and, yes, respect what happened there.
Fun fact: I wouldn't give a damn if they didn't even make the games, in fact, maybe we could do without the whole genre of historically based war games.
How many people have actually gained respect for those events through games? Come on now, people just like to feel like the good guy shooting the sh*t out of the bad guys. From personal experience the people who really enjoy these games that I have met tend to show little in terms of intelligence when it comes to actual battles and are more along the lines of those people who think that they themselves can goto X country and put a boot in its ass and that they would be cool for doing so.
Post by: NinGurl69 *huggles on September 14, 2007, 01:38:25 PM
Post by: GoldenPhoenix on September 14, 2007, 01:41:32 PM
Quote
Originally posted by: MashiroQuote
So a visual representation is true suffering?
Many scenes in saving private ryan scared the ever loving crap out of me and certainly make me never ever want to be a part of a war . . .Quote
Maybe the game should also let you rape an individual, because without that then it woudln't be a true representation of war, because that stuff goes on all the time. Then guess what? The game would be rated AO and no one would get to play it, brilliant! That is the way to teach people about war, make in inaccessible for most individuals. Heck at the very least "respectful" games to war would be rated M, closing the door on underage buyers, which in turn could be turning away individuals that may find something of interest and, yes, respect what happened there.
Fun fact: I wouldn't give a damn if they didn't even make the games, in fact, maybe we could do without the whole genre of historically based war games.
How many people have actually gained respect for those events through games? Come on now, people just like to feel like the good guy shooting the sh*t out of the bad guys. From personal experience the people who really enjoy these games that I have met tend to show little in terms of intelligence when it comes to actual battles and are more along the lines of those people who think that they themselves can goto X country and put a boot in its ass and that they would be cool for doing so.
I personally found Saving Private Ryan to be overrated, I prefer We were Heroes. SPR was so dang cliche, whether it be the bad guy they let go (who would have more than likely been shot) came back to haunt them in a forced scene in the end, or an idiot taking off his helmet in battle and getting shot in the head. Nice generalization by the way, so now people who play these games show little intelligence in what real war is like. Heck unless you actually have fought in a war, you probably don't know as much as you think you do either. Since you appear to like making generalizing based on your experience, I've found that war games/movies etc have inspired me to look deeper into them.
Post by: Mashiro on September 14, 2007, 02:34:21 PM
Quote
Since you appear to like making generalizing
But GP that is all you do is generalize so what difference does it make?
Post by: GoldenPhoenix on September 14, 2007, 02:37:31 PM
Quote
Originally posted by: MashiroQuote
Since you appear to like making generalizing
But GP that is all you do is generalize so what difference does it make?
Well your face is ugly.
Post by: ShyGuy on October 09, 2007, 09:24:10 PM
Post by: IceCold on October 09, 2007, 09:27:23 PM
Post by: couchmonkey on October 10, 2007, 03:50:26 AM
Post by: darknight06 on October 10, 2007, 06:03:50 PM
Post by: bubicus on October 10, 2007, 10:16:10 PM
Post by: NinGurl69 *huggles on October 11, 2007, 06:09:34 PM
Post by: bustin98 on October 11, 2007, 06:11:15 PM
Post by: jakeOSX on October 12, 2007, 01:09:49 AM
though i didn't want ANOTHER WW2 FPS. i'll just have to get rid of COD3...
Post by: Berto2K on October 14, 2007, 03:01:35 PM
Post by: ShyGuy on October 14, 2007, 05:00:07 PM
Post by: Berto2K on October 15, 2007, 12:05:44 AM
Post by: ShyGuy on November 03, 2007, 05:36:01 AM
http://media.wii.ign.com/media/947/947233/vids_2.html
Post by: Caliban on November 03, 2007, 02:43:11 PM
Post by: NinGurl69 *huggles on November 04, 2007, 12:10:04 AM
Post by: Caliban on November 04, 2007, 11:14:47 AM
Post by: GoldenPhoenix on November 08, 2007, 01:59:52 PM
With statements like that I have to truly consider getting it. Like Kairon, I want to support 3rd parties for Wii, but unlike Kairon I don't want to support garbage. hehe
Post by: Smash_Brother on November 08, 2007, 02:27:17 PM
Gonna get it through gamefly once I'm done with Ninjabread man.
Post by: GoldenPhoenix on November 08, 2007, 02:31:22 PM
Quote
Originally posted by: Smash_Brother
It does sound pretty good.
Gonna get it through gamefly once I'm done with Ninjabread man.
Has Kairon's spirit possessed you?!?!?
Post by: ShyGuy on November 08, 2007, 02:36:39 PM
Post by: Smash_Brother on November 08, 2007, 02:44:22 PM
Quote
Originally posted by: GoldenPhoenix Has Kairon's spirit possessed you?!?!?
Relax. I only rented it through gamefly.
Post by: that Baby guy on November 08, 2007, 02:50:36 PM
Post by: Kairon on November 08, 2007, 03:50:02 PM
Post by: NWR_pap64 on November 08, 2007, 03:56:27 PM
Guitar Hero 3 Wii is doing really well...
RE 4 is a massive hit despite being a 2 year old game...
Zak and Wiki is one of the best reviewed and beloved third party games on the Wii...
And now MOH 2 has the best FPS controls on the Wii.
Looks like a third party rennaisance (sp?) is slowly happening...
Post by: Kairon on November 08, 2007, 04:02:53 PM
Post by: NWR_pap64 on November 08, 2007, 04:08:04 PM
We still have a long way to go but when a site says that the controls on a third party game are BETTER than some of Nintendo's own offerings it just makes me happy.
Post by: Infernal Monkey on November 09, 2007, 10:14:47 PM
It's awesome that the first EA game I want to buy on Wii is also the first one that's going to suffer months of delay for the PAL version for some reason. Usually their games arrive a day or two after America.
Post by: Terranigma Freak on November 10, 2007, 03:17:13 AM
Quote
Originally posted by: pap64
Hmmm...
Guitar Hero 3 Wii is doing really well...
RE 4 is a massive hit despite being a 2 year old game...
Zak and Wiki is one of the best reviewed and beloved third party games on the Wii...
And now MOH 2 has the best FPS controls on the Wii.
Looks like a third party rennaisance (sp?) is slowly happening...
Not only that, but the list has VARIETY, unlike the Xbox 360's shooter, shooter, and more shooter catalog of games. Right now, all we can hope for is that both MOH2 and Z&W sell really well.
Post by: ShyGuy on November 10, 2007, 04:07:10 AM
Post by: Kenology on November 14, 2007, 02:00:52 PM
But man, those dudes on this game are already beasts. I got totally pwned! People already had like 600+ points, what's really good!? The game just came out today!
Post by: Kairon on November 14, 2007, 02:02:35 PM
Post by: IceCold on November 14, 2007, 02:26:56 PM
QuoteSeriously? With 32 players?
So I just tried the online multiplayer. It ran totally smooth and lag free.
Damn, that's impressive..
Post by: NWR_insanolord on November 14, 2007, 02:52:51 PM
Now of course I bought the game tonight, but I don't think I'll be able to spend much time with it until I've played through more of Galaxy.
Post by: Kairon on November 14, 2007, 03:03:10 PM
Post by: ShyGuy on November 14, 2007, 03:41:05 PM
Post by: darknight06 on November 14, 2007, 04:54:20 PM
Post by: ShyGuy on November 14, 2007, 06:08:51 PM
My EA Nation Username is: ShyGuy1976
Post by: Kenology on November 15, 2007, 02:14:44 AM
Post by: ShyGuy on November 15, 2007, 07:12:28 PM
Post by: Caliban on November 16, 2007, 05:10:35 PM
Post by: ShyGuy on November 16, 2007, 06:28:49 PM
http://www.gamespot.com/wii/action/medalofhonorheroes2/review.html?sid=6183047
Post by: Kenology on November 17, 2007, 02:02:52 AM
Post by: ShyGuy on November 17, 2007, 07:04:49 AM
Post by: IceCold on November 17, 2007, 08:11:05 AM
Post by: ShyGuy on November 17, 2007, 04:11:52 PM
Pros:
- Controls are very smooth and incredibly customizable. I recommend turning the horizontal turn speed up and narrowing the dead zone, but leaving it fairly tall.
- Online play is very smooth, amazing for the amount of people per game.
- The graphical textures in the game are very well done (except for a few holes) and in spots the character modeling and animation is decent.
- The waggle aspects of the game are well done and fit the game well;
Cons:
- The AI is bad, and the disappearing corpes annoy me (seriously, if they had stayed on the ground for a few more seconds it would have been nicer)
- The graphics needed another six months of polish to be truly stellar. You will run into certain objects (like the trucks) that it looks like they didn't have time to re-texture since the first PSP version. Also, the animation while playing online can be a bit hokey.
- The level design is a bit sparse, again most likely due to the fact that is was also developed for the PSP.
Post by: ShyGuy on November 17, 2007, 07:30:04 PM
Post by: DAaaMan64 on November 18, 2007, 07:40:04 AM
Thanks ShyGuy
Post by: darknight06 on November 19, 2007, 03:50:28 PM
Post by: singleman23 on November 20, 2007, 12:14:18 PM
Post by: wulffman04 on November 20, 2007, 04:44:07 PM
Quote
Originally posted by: ShyGuy
I just had three good rounds in my created game (called NWR Funhouse) CTF seems the best mode in online. Really enjoying getting back into the online FPS thang. I will always call my game that, so if you are on MOHH2, look for it!
I'll tell my friend to look out for NWR Funhouse, he isn't on the forums but he visits the site regularly
Post by: BlackNMild2k1 on November 21, 2007, 12:50:03 PM
Now should I go trade in FE for MoH:H2?
it is 16 player online w/ no fiend codes or something like that right?
and there are quite a few NWR people that have the game, right?
Post by: darknight06 on November 21, 2007, 01:17:57 PM
Post by: patriotsfan93 on November 21, 2007, 07:46:05 PM
thanks.
Post by: Kairon on November 21, 2007, 07:50:51 PM
Post by: ShyGuy on November 21, 2007, 08:20:44 PM
Post by: Kenology on November 22, 2007, 02:28:53 AM
Quote
Originally posted by: ShyGuy
Played some Halo 3 deathmatch tonight. Makes me realize how superior the Wii controls are over dual analog, and also how much better Halo 3's multiplayer maps are
My friend brought his XBox360 over last night, but we couldn't play online because he didn't bring his internet cable. Sucks the 360 doesn't have Wi-Fi. But yeah, the controls were so hard to get used to after playing with the Wiimote and nunchuk for so long! I suck at FPS's with traditional pads now.
Also, I have yet to see the NWR Funhouse on MOH:H2 - what's good!?
Post by: patriotsfan93 on November 22, 2007, 10:58:51 AM
Quote
Originally posted by: Kairon
Nope.
Oh... Well its still worth it anyways.
Post by: Flames_of_chaos on November 23, 2007, 06:27:07 AM
Post by: Kenology on November 24, 2007, 05:54:36 AM
Post by: ShyGuy on November 24, 2007, 06:02:55 AM
Post by: ShyGuy on November 28, 2007, 02:18:00 PM
Post by: MilkManX on November 29, 2007, 02:32:11 AM
Post by: ShyGuy on December 08, 2007, 06:36:33 AM
