He made a topic about Shigeru Miyamoto, the one topic anyone would bite on a Nintendo forum, and copied and pasted Shiggy's wiki entry.
Shill.
Title: RE: ORLY?
Post by: oohhboy on May 24, 2007, 05:46:56 PM
OBJECTION!
I object to the statement that ARO has put forth stating that he is not a shill!!!!. He is badggering the prosecuction.
I will make a motion to have the defendent gaged by ball gag your honour.
Title: RE: ORLY?
Post by: Shecky on May 24, 2007, 05:58:58 PM
I taking up phoenix wright's role... I object to your claims and have my counter arguments.
Title: RE:ORLY?
Post by: Kairon on May 24, 2007, 06:01:18 PM
Quote Originally posted by: Smash_Brother He made a topic about Shigeru Miyamoto, the one topic anyone would bite on a Nintendo forum, and copied and pasted Shiggy's wiki entry.
Can't we ban him AFTER we finish a delicious meal of Shigeru Miyamoto discussion?
Title: RE: ORLY?
Post by: Shecky on May 24, 2007, 06:07:22 PM
Court is in session on the main thread... Really right now you folks don't even have a case, even in Wright's world.
Edit, I call for a recess... I'll be back tomorrow to attempt and shoot down any more outlandish claims by the prosecution.
Title: RE: ORLY?
Post by: Smash_Brother on May 24, 2007, 06:15:30 PM
I'll be seeing you in court!
Title: RE: ORLY?
Post by: Shecky on May 24, 2007, 06:39:22 PM
We'll continue this tomorrow!
Title: RE:ORLY?
Post by: S-U-P-E-R on May 24, 2007, 07:34:43 PM
It's spring and all the terrible posters are coming out of the woodwork. I like the policy of calling them out/driving them insane and they either post dumber, funnier posts, leave on their own, or flip out and do something to get banned. That's good odds for increasing the entertainment value of the forum, IMO!
Title: RE:ORLY?
Post by: S-U-P-E-R on May 24, 2007, 07:41:26 PM
I just checked his profile and saw that he's Union Pentagon, ahahahahahah
Title: RE:ORLY?
Post by: Khushrenada on May 24, 2007, 07:43:03 PM
I don't want to spoil your gaming enjoyment and I really hate repeating myself but it just seems appropriate in this case.
As I have stated twice before in these threads:
Quote Consider the evidence:
(Alright I will. Will this evidence come with Phoenix Wright screens or characters?)
No, those aren't actually funny and just waste everyone's time.
So, as I shall state one more time, I don't want to spoil your gaming enjoyment, but I simply cannot understand why people think Phoenix Wright faux arguements are funny. They aren't.
Now what would be funny is if the avatars were from some forgotton fighter like.. I don't know... Clayfighter. Then that would be funny. Lame characters for a lame fight between lame posters. Oh Khushrenada. How do you sleep at night after goading so many posters?
Title: RE: ORLY?
Post by: Shecky on May 25, 2007, 01:33:46 AM
Objection!
Those cited examples were lame b/c they didn't actually have any meat behind the arguments....
I'm finding this quite enjoyable and I bet other are too.
Besides we're trying to save your _____!
Title: RE:ORLY?
Post by: Shift Key on May 25, 2007, 04:19:18 AM
Quote Originally posted by: S-U-P-E-R I just checked his profile and saw that he's Union Pentagon, ahahahahahah
He's a keeper!
Title: RE: ORLY?
Post by: Smash_Brother on May 25, 2007, 06:20:28 AM
I object on the basis that Kushrenada doesn't have a soul, ergo he has no right to express an opinion, own land, vote or join the NWR staff.