Gaming Forums => Nintendo Gaming => Topic started by: UncleBob on September 17, 2006, 03:25:36 PM
Title: That $250 price tag again...
Post by: UncleBob on September 17, 2006, 03:25:36 PM
Okay, I was posting about this over on CAG and was playing with some numbers...
A lot of people are complaining that the $250 tag on the Wii is way too high for what many are considering an "upgraded GameCube with a new controller". So let's go with that.
The GameCube costs $100 new. Subtract the $20 for the price of the older controller and you get $80.
Now, add in the $50 Wii Sports. There are those who will claim that Wii Sports isn't worth $50, but, regardless of what you may think, it'd be a $50 game at launch.
Now, the major upgrade that the Wii itself has over the GameCube is the built-in WiFi. That's hard to put a price on, but we'll have to go on what's established. The GameCube had a wired Broadband adapter that ran $30-$35 new. The Wireless adapter for the XBox 360 runs $100. So what would the "retail cost" of adding WiFi to the GameCube be worth? I'm going to say $50 (though that is debatable).
Next, the controller. The only "next gen" controller is the XBox 360's and it runs $50 (for the wireless one - and the Wii is wireless). Considering how much more crap is crammed into the Wii controller (motion sensor, memory, speaker, etc), I don't think the MSRP of $60 is too much to expect from the Wii Controller/Nunchuck pair.
So, $80 GameCube + $50 Wii Sports + $50 WiFi + $60 Controller... $240, a mere ten bucks shy from the price of the GameCube... Now, aside from the controller and WiFi, is it too much to ask for $10 for the other upgrades in the Wii (the Mii Profile maker, Flash Memory, SD slot, etc)... am I right?
Title: RE: That $250 price tag again...
Post by: Hostile Creation on September 17, 2006, 03:29:01 PM
A PS3 is an upgraded PS2 without a new controller. Same thing for the Xbox 360. This is a reasonable equation you've set up, but you're debating against a bunch of whiners who don't know what they're talking about, who've deluded themselves into believing that they can't be wrong. Personally, I wouldn't quantify what the Wii can do. Nintendo is, I feel, giving us significantly more than the competition, and they're charging less for it. Anyone who thinks Wii should be 180 or 200 dollars convinced themselves of that, there's no good reasoning behind it.
Title: RE: That $250 price tag again...
Post by: jasonditz on September 17, 2006, 03:35:26 PM
Of course in the end it's a judgement call... some people don't want Wifi, some people don't want Wii Sports... some people don't want a $60 controller...
I think I might take one of those $80 Gamecubes though
Title: RE: That $250 price tag again...
Post by: IceCold on September 17, 2006, 03:38:09 PM
Quote Okay, I was posting about this over on CAG and was playing with some numbers...
A lot of people are complaining that the $250 tag on the Wii is way too high
Well. What the hell did you expect?
Hostile's right; the $250 is very fair - the amount of features and potential that the Wii has is a bargain for that price..
Title: RE: That $250 price tag again...
Post by: mantidor on September 17, 2006, 03:54:13 PM
I wouldn't call it a bargain, but its not an unreasonable price.
besides you are using retail prices for wiisports and the controller, but Im sure their production costs are lower (specially for wiisports, that game doesn't look like it needed a high budget), Nintendo might be making more than just $10 for each console.
What Im not sure about is people saying is just a repackaged GC, its a brand new chip that has to be superior to the GC. As far as I know, its not even cheap to try to use old technology, sometimes old technology is even more expensive to produce and much harder to offer support to because it has been discontinued.
Title: RE: That $250 price tag again...
Post by: BigJim on September 17, 2006, 04:18:50 PM
If Nintendo says they're breaking even on hardware, I believe they're breaking even on hardware. To hell with the math or their perceptions. But they are profitting on those controllers. I don't care what they say.
Those $50 Xbox controllers are in the realm of $15 bucks to make and package. The Wiimotes aren't *that* smart to be terribly more expensive than that. $20 is probably not an unreasonable assumption.
The built-in Wifi is a multi-function chip that also handles the Bluetooth. And not having much knowledge of the system to work with (exactly what kind of CPU and GPU horsepower is in there), it's hard to put a quantitive value on its portion of the hardware makeup. But still, to hell with 'em.
Title: RE: That $250 price tag again...
Post by: Arbok on September 17, 2006, 05:30:49 PM
I think the problem with the price is simply perception. Nintendo never gave a price at E3, and because of that everyone and their uncle begain to speculate. Nintendo did say less than $250, but $200 became the figured price from most after famous examples like: "You could buy a Wii and a Xbox 360 for the price of a PS3" and so on. In a sense, this set the bar down to that level, and then people were dissapointed when it didn't meet that.
It's much like the PSP. Analysts were giving huge figures on what the handheld would cost, and then when it was announced for cheaper those following it actually were impressed with the price due to earlier preception. Was it still way too expensive at launch? Hell yes. But the price tag was overblown leading up to it so people weren't taken back by it.
Anyway, kind of unrelated, but I think Tycho of Penny Arcade put it best about this whole thing: "I expected the price to come in a little lower than two-fifty, just as I think most people did, but I think they're in a tough position. I'm more than satisfied with the steep, almost treacherous price delta between it and the Xbox 400, and the difference between this product and Sony's offering is so vast that the person presented with this disparity would assume that there had been a grievous misprint in their Sunday circular. The price needs to simultaneously say that "we are not those other guys" while somehow retaining the idea that their machine is the same type of product. Plus, it's not like they have some beleaguered little twist of retail shrapnel here. People want this thing pretty bad. It's hardly extortion."
Title: RE:That $250 price tag again...
Post by: GoldenPhoenix on September 17, 2006, 05:40:45 PM
Well I've realized the price difference between the Xbox 360 core and Wii is more than I thought. Let's face it with xbox 360 you need to at least buy a memory card and a game, that right there jacks the price up 90-100$. With Wii you get EVERYTHING you need to begin playing including a game. So really we are looking at a 140-150$ price difference between the core Xbox 360 system and Wii.
Title: RE: That $250 price tag again...
Post by: King of Twitch on September 17, 2006, 05:48:56 PM
As fun as it looks I don't think Wii Sports is a $50 game.
Gamecube graphics x2 = $200 + $60 controller + magic + wifi adapter and FREE internetting + wand and wasn't there a stand?? I wonder if that's still in the box
Title: RE: That $250 price tag again...
Post by: KnowsNothing on September 17, 2006, 05:50:28 PM
Quote Well I've realized the price difference between the Xbox 360 core and Wii is more than I thought. Let's face it with xbox 360 you need to at least buy a memory card and a game, that right there jacks the price up 90-100$. With Wii you get EVERYTHING you need to begin playing including a game. So really we are looking at a 140-150$ price difference for the between the core Xbox 360 system and Wii.
Yeah, but average joe looks and says "$50 is SO worth being popular" and goes on their merry way.
Then they get home and cry.
Title: RE: That $250 price tag again...
Post by: Ceric on September 17, 2006, 06:47:37 PM
Quote The built-in Wifi is a multi-function chip that also handles the Bluetooth.
Just a side note Mult-function chips are normally expensive. Well good ones at least. I know why they used one though.
I think the argument wasn't the cost to produce it was the cost to the consumer. In which he makes a good point. I'm fairly sure that a Wii base unit selling at $80 at this point would probably be a lost for Nintendo. A year from now maybe not. Sure the WiiPointer is expensive but in every field accessories are marked up and will make a profit. Be it lawn tractors or electronics. Accessories go into the want category not the need category. I don't need another remote to play my Wii. As I don't need an SD card. If I want to save then I need an SD card. If I want a friend or family member to play with me I need another controller.
It won't stop you from using and maybe enjoying the Wii, in this case, just you probably won't enjoy it as much. (Lets face it Zelda is suppose to be so long that a marathon through would kill you from sleep deprivation like those people at Internet cafes that die from Evercrack addictions and like.) Wants are things that you will eventual reach a justification and make it happen. Sort of like I don't need the Component hook-ups to play the Wii but I want the Component hook-ups to play the Wii and I'll probably get them even if they were $50, the cost of the only set in town for the PS2 (which hurt but I needed them that day.)
Title: RE: That $250 price tag again...
Post by: Infernal Monkey on September 17, 2006, 06:52:01 PM
The price of the system isn't that bad, it's the bloody controllers that are the real killer. It's not like there'll be cheaper 3rd party ones, either.
Title: RE: That $250 price tag again...
Post by: BranDonk Kong on September 17, 2006, 07:01:16 PM
You know I've never taken the built-in WiFi capabilities into the Wii when thinking about it's price. It's probably a minimum of a $40 value (based on 3rd party products for other consoles, or say a USB, PCI or PMCIA wireless card).
Title: RE:That $250 price tag again...
Post by: Nick DiMola on September 17, 2006, 07:28:53 PM
Quote Originally posted by: Brandogg You know I've never taken the built-in WiFi capabilities into the Wii when thinking about it's price. It's probably a minimum of a $40 value (based on 3rd party products for other consoles, or say a USB, PCI or PMCIA wireless card).
I agree, I always forget about the Wifi capabilities and just how HUGE it really is. It will be so nice to not have to run yet another ethernet cable behind my entertainment center. My router as of now is full to the brim and I need to swap cables constantly. I would love to have wifi in the xbox or the 360 but the wifi adaptor for each is around $100. Nintendo probably picked up quite a bit of manufacturing cost by putting that in, but it is very cool of them to do so.
Title: RE:That $250 price tag again...
Post by: trip1eX on September 17, 2006, 08:17:09 PM
Yeah one reason NIntendo put in Wi-Fi is to keep things simple for consumers.
I did a similar analysis of the Wii. Think of it like you're upgrading your pc.
I don't how many of you have pcgamed, but upgrading is a way of life. And upgrading your cpu from 2 ghz to 3ghz is something alot of folks do. That's a 50% speed increase. Same with the gpu on a pc. Upgrading your gpu so it's 50% is a major upgrade. And last, but not least doubling your memory is also major. And, in essence, that's what we are seeing here with the Wii.
So borrowing heavily from the OP (I actually posted this or a similar write-up a day or two ago on another forum, but not here) we present the new generation. The ability to upgrade ala carte. (OK not really. All upgrades are mandatory, but I think the analog to upgrading or buying a built to order pc are appropriate here.)
Would you pay $79.99 for a new cpu, gpu and memory add-on that gave your 'Cube such speed increases as %05 or more? .... while knowing that future games will take full advantage of said add-on? And that these games would be available immediately? I would.
NOw let's take the controller. Would you pay $59.99 for a controller add-on knowing that Nintendo and 3rd parties would release countless game titles for it over the years? FRom what I've read so far I'd have to say that I would.
HOw about WiiSports? Ok you might not be interested in the game. But can we agree that it's worth some value? I think the game too will probably have more depth than folks are expecting. The analog 3d control certainly means more depth than just pressing a button or two. And certainly the potential of this is in competing against others. Anyway let's play it safe and price it at $29.99.
OK you're probably see where I'm going with this (of course you you already know as it's the same thing the OP has done ,) but anyway I'm not stopping there.
OK NIntendo is whipping their online service into shape. For that you're going to need a connection to the internet. Nintendo is offering a Wi-Fi upgrade for your GameCube. IT's $29.99. Are you along for the ride? Count me in there too.
Next let's say Nintendo offers a a smaller case with stand for your Gamecube. It's the size of 3 DVD cases. Tiny. And along with that they give you a new Slot Drive disc player that will accept both GAmecube discs and larger proprietary DVD discs for newer games. Let's not forget some kewl neon lights? What's this worth to you? Would you bite for $10? I think I would. Of course you pretty much have too if you're to play some of the new games.
Ok on to WiiConnect24. Here's our instant-on sleep mode. OUr power saving circuitry. The ability to download while you sleep and receive messages from friends and NIntendo and receive weather updates and who knows what else. What would you pay for this if you could upgrade your 'Cube? $10?
Next how about Free online play along with access to the virtual console and the Wii channels? Would cough up another one time fee of $10 to access all this? If you're in for Wi-Fi then you're here I suppose. $10 it is.
Next let's talk about the internal 512mb flash memory and sd card/usb support. I'm pricing this at $10. A 512mb flash drive in the store is a good $10 or $20 at least. SD card support will let you the photo browser and store VC games and updates galore. Hopefully Nintendo does something with the USB ports. You don't have to get this upgrade, but then you'd be using GC memory cards which have little storage for a premium price.
How about upgradeable O/S that the Wii has along the sensor bar technology? Surely that's worth $10.
Another reason the Wii is priced a bit higher than some might think is that it's circuitry has been shrunk down to fit in such a small size. Over it's lifetime of heavy playing you're likely to realize some power savings that will certainly add up. Who knows what this be? I know that Nintendo said something like 20 or 30% energy savings for alot more system processing power. Of course the always on feature might diminish this a bit, but supposedly it uses very little power while asleep equivalent to a tiny light bulb.
Anyway I'm conveniently getting $250 here. I don't think I priced these upgrades outrageously tho.
I think the reason folks think the Wii is a bit over-priced are two fold.
First, when Nintendo said $250 at the most the internet started hoping for $200. (REally if folks thought $200 was aobut right then throwing in WiiSports and calling it $250 isn't that far off.)
Second, I think the gaming public is just used to getting the same thing only faster. And thus their immediate reaction is wtf? I think you really need to see the wiimote as Nintendo's hi-def even if you don't think highly of it right now. That's where alot of Wii development money went and where alot of Wii manufacturing money is going to. YOu also need to see that the cost of miniuaturization and more power/watt is hi-tech and is more expensive than not making the same console larger and more power consuming.
OH there's another reason too. And that's that Nintendo isn't selling everything at a loss. I think they need to do that because gaming is their only business. They can't afford to lose $4 billion or they might get wiped out. So maybe you pay more upfront relative to cost, but you can see why the competition video games are $10 more. OR at least one reason they are. You can see why MS Wi-FI adapters are $100 and their Wavebird-equivalent controllers are $50. NOt that Nintendo won't do their share of high priced accessories, but I really think $60 for the wiimote and nunchuk is because there's alot of hi-tech stuff in those things.
OK got a book going. over and out.
Title: RE:That $250 price tag again...
Post by: jasonditz on September 17, 2006, 09:34:48 PM
Quote Originally posted by: Infernal Monkey The price of the system isn't that bad, it's the bloody controllers that are the real killer. It's not like there'll be cheaper 3rd party ones, either.
You never know... Mad Catz was talking about getting in on that market. I can only hope they do a better job than most third parties though.
Title: RE: That $250 price tag again...
Post by: King of Twitch on September 17, 2006, 10:03:46 PM
I forgot the thing has 4 GC controller ports and 2 memory slots, there's an extra $5. Unless they've taken those out too.
Title: RE: That $250 price tag again...
Post by: IceCold on September 17, 2006, 10:07:57 PM
It's such intricate technology, though, that even if they did it, they would probably have all sorts of issues..
Title: RE:That $250 price tag again...
Post by: GoldenPhoenix on September 17, 2006, 11:23:19 PM
I still think it is a bit unfair to only call Wii a GCx2 or something like that. I'm willing to bet that Nintendo keeps the official specs close to themselves for quite awhile, but with that said some of the games for Wii are looking stunning and do not look like GC 2. Not to mention it seems the vast majority of Wii games are running smoothly with hardly any Framerate hitches, that in itself shows that it has more "power" behind it than GC even with prettier visuals.
Title: RE: That $250 price tag again...
Post by: Ian Sane on September 18, 2006, 08:05:57 AM
I think if had we no indication about what the price was beforehand $250 wouldn't be that expensive. But Nintendo gave us hints about the price that suggested differently. They said "under $250" and then set the price to $249.99. Whenever talks about inferior hardware came up they said that they were trying to lower costs to have a mass market friendly price. But now we find out they're making a profit on the hardware. They gave us the impression that we were going to be getting a low price console and we're not. They let us think of a certain price range because they put it in our head in the first place. I think the "under $250" comment alone makes them look like total dickheads.
They should have just said nothing and then we would all think $250 is a great affordable price. It's like how not going online with the Cube wasn't that big of a deal. The real issue was lying about vague plans that never surfaced. Making Zelda a cartoon wasn't a big deal, showing completely different looking footage for an entire year beforehand was.
Title: RE:That $250 price tag again...
Post by: Donutt007 on September 18, 2006, 08:14:17 AM
They should have just said at E3. "It will cost less then $300" Or maybe something like "You'll be able to buy at least two of them for the price of a PS3" hahaha. Screw it, I'm ok with the price, I do wish they'd make a controller/nunchuk combo for $50, that's my only gripe
Title: RE: That $250 price tag again...
Post by: couchmonkey on September 18, 2006, 08:17:16 AM
Yeah, realisitically the price is fine...it gets a little stickier once you add in the high controller prices, but I think the thing that made everyone go nuts is that Nintendo was kind of pushing this console as value-oriented rather than powerful, and combined with the "no more than $250" comments, a lot of people assumed it would be cheaper than that.
It's like a hockey team says they're going to score more goals next year, and gets a new coach who emphasizes offense plus a couple of promising forwards, only to score just 10 more goals in the new season.
Title: RE:That $250 price tag again...
Post by: jasonditz on September 18, 2006, 08:18:46 AM
Quote Originally posted by: Ian Sane I think if had we no indication about what the price was beforehand $250 wouldn't be that expensive. But Nintendo gave us hints about the price that suggested differently. They said "under $250" and then set the price to $249.99. Whenever talks about inferior hardware came up they said that they were trying to lower costs to have a mass market friendly price. But now we find out they're making a profit on the hardware. They gave us the impression that we were going to be getting a low price console and we're not. They let us think of a certain price range because they put it in our head in the first place. I think the "under $250" comment alone makes them look like total dickheads.
They should have just said nothing and then we would all think $250 is a great affordable price. It's like how not going online with the Cube wasn't that big of a deal. The real issue was lying about vague plans that never surfaced. Making Zelda a cartoon wasn't a big deal, showing completely different looking footage for an entire year beforehand was.
Considering how many times lately they've "said" something and then wound up having their fingers crossed, I'm surprised it didn't launch at $299.99 (or $299.98 to beat the core 360).
Title: RE:That $250 price tag again...
Post by: Avinash_Tyagi on September 18, 2006, 10:35:39 AM
The $250 price tag and the launch date are purely in respons to the PS3 torubles Sony has been having, they know thay can get away with it, so they want to make as much profit as they can right out of the gate
Title: RE:That $250 price tag again...
Post by: IceCold on September 18, 2006, 12:28:18 PM
Quote They should have just said nothing and then we would all think $250 is a great affordable price. It's like how not going online with the Cube wasn't that big of a deal
Well, even if they hadn't said anything, there was a lot of speculation going on.. Unrealistically low figures were being thrown around, and Nintendo couldn't do anything to stop this. After months of reading this speculation, even if Nintendo themselves hadn't said anything, the price would still sting to many..
Also, and correct me if I am wrong on this, but that $250 US ceiling pricepoint didn't come from over here, did it? I thought that Nintendo had a meeting or a conference in Japan, and they set the limit in terms of Yen. Converted to US dollars, it came up to around $250, but that piece of news wasn't directly from North America. And, technically, in Japan it will launch for what is currently $212 US, which is quite a bit lower than $250.
It's like how a hockey franchise says it is going to cut its ticket prices after the lockout, to get fans excited about the coming season after a year where they were severely mistreated. They also say that, since a salary cap has been implemented, it gives them a chance to pass on the savings to the fans. They don't, however, say how much they will drop the prices by. This leads to a lot of speculation and lowball estimates. Before the season starts, the franchise reveals the updated prices; it turns out that they are very good prices (comparatively) which include many perks. However, they aren't as low as many were saying, leading to some discontentment..
GO CANUCKS!
Title: RE:That $250 price tag again...
Post by: slacker on September 18, 2006, 07:21:52 PM
For a system that rely on localized multiplayer family oriented fun, the price of the console package (which contains a game with multiplayer fun) results in a price that is quite high, in my opinion. You add the second remote without the nunchuck and it reaches the $300 mark with taxes. I find this unacceptable unless the console can seriously dish out some powerful graphics. Because the price of the remote is in the $40 range, what 3rd party is going to make a game that requires 2 remote. I think Nintendo knows that they will sell out the system at launch regardless of price. All hardcore gamers will snatch one up on launch day. Parents after seeing the price of a complete XBOX360 and the price of the PS3 will balk and choose the Wii for their kids. You get a sell out regardless. I'm hoping the controllers drop in price after the holidays, but I doubt it. I'm disappointed in the price. It should be at $200. I think Nintendo is making a serious killing on the margins. Since we haven't seen the full Wii specs and based on rumors that its really an upgraded GC, I think Nintendo can afford to lower the price. Of course launch is a few months away, and they can claim to have a manufacturing break through that will lower the cost of the package to $200 by then. Here's hoping...
Title: RE: That $250 price tag again...
Post by: Kairon on September 18, 2006, 08:38:07 PM
The tech is in the controller. Why do you think the darn things cost so much?
~Carmine M. Red Kairon@aol.com
Title: RE:That $250 price tag again...
Post by: Smash_Brother on September 18, 2006, 09:09:58 PM
Quote Originally posted by: slacker For a system that rely on localized multiplayer family oriented fun, the price of the console package (which contains a game with multiplayer fun) results in a price that is quite high, in my opinion. You add the second remote without the nunchuck and it reaches the $300 mark with taxes.
Yeah, this is the kicker for me.
I'll likely still buy 3 extra Wiimotes with nunchucks because I want Red Steel multiplayer, but I ain't gonna be happy about it.
Given the price of a full controller, I guess it's all about "Mii" after all.
Title: RE:That $250 price tag again...
Post by: Adrock on September 18, 2006, 10:12:06 PM
Wii Sports had to be there to appeal to the non-gamer, but the game begs to be played mutliplayer and hence practically requires a second controller. Selling the controller separately and charging $40 pushes non-gamers away. My mom is a non-gamer (though she plays a mean game of Tetris). There's no way in hell she'd spend $40 on a controller for herself. I think that's the biggest problem with the console package and Nintendo's philosophy. When they announced the name, they had that video of the i's playing together and representing controllers. Then they released picture after picture of people playing Wii Sports together. Now after all is said and done, they're releasing the console with one controller.
My problem with Nintendo making money on consoles is that they make most of their money on software and licensing fees. If Nintendo released Wii with 2 controllers thoughout its life, they could:
1. Sell more consoles. 2. Reach non-gamers with greater ease. 3. Sell more software across the board, 1st and 3rd, thus making Nintendo even more money by way of licensing fees and proprietary Wii discs/kits as well as profits of their own titles.
$249.99 is a decent price, but when you think about what they could've done at that price, it doesn't really make sense.
Title: RE: That $250 price tag again...
Post by: Kairon on September 18, 2006, 10:16:55 PM
Yeah, I really think that maybe Nintendo looked at the $600 PS3 and decided that they had some breathing room. Don't forget, the Wii is $215 in Japan w/o Wii Sports.
We might have actually seen a $229 price or lower if Sony hadn't made as many missteps as they have recently, but as of now I think Nintendo believes it's safe to milk us early adopters for moolah... as is any console's right at launch.
~Carmine M. Red Kairon@aol.com
Title: RE: That $250 price tag again...
Post by: Mario on September 18, 2006, 10:32:24 PM
Hey I just realised we wont have to buy a memory card. This does work out cheaper than GC, making Wii the cheapest system of all time.
Title: RE: That $250 price tag again...
Post by: Kairon on September 18, 2006, 10:43:52 PM
Built-in Wi-fi makes me happy.
~Carmine M. Red Kairon@aol.com
Title: RE:That $250 price tag again...
Post by: Smash_Brother on September 18, 2006, 10:47:28 PM
Quote Originally posted by: Mario Hey I just realised we wont have to buy a memory card. This does work out cheaper than GC, making Wii the cheapest system of all time.
Not if you have other people you want to play with...
And that's if you're willing to only play Wiisports, which I sure as hell ain't.
Rather, this is my deal:
Wii $250 3 controllers with chucks $180 Red Steel $50
Total: $480
I spent less on my cube with 2 games.
Title: RE:That $250 price tag again...
Post by: Adrock on September 19, 2006, 12:14:48 PM
What if Nintendo was losing money per freehand controller at $40 because of all the tech in there? Wouldn't that just blow your mind? I think if that was true, the price wouldn't be as much of an issue. This isn't Blu-Ray being forced into your living room at a high yet technically low price. No one wants Blu-Ray that badly. Wii revolves around its controller technology. The price of the controllers is a hard pill to swallow, but it's still in the realm of reasonability. Going in, you know what you're paying for and that's the whole reason you're paying. With PS3 and 360, I know what I'm paying for, I just don't think its worth the price of entry or really what I want from a gaming machine.
Title: RE: That $250 price tag again...
Post by: AnyoneEB on September 19, 2006, 04:02:20 PM
Smash_Brother: I thought I paid $35 for GCN controllers at launch? (+4*$5 for controller extensions, but most people don't need those)
Adrock: I'm pretty sure that none of the tech in the controller is not actually that expensive, just no one had put it in a game controller before. I assume there is a _LARGE_ profit on the controllers for Nintendo (same for every other console ever).
That said, I still plan on getting extra 3 WiiMotes at launch (no nunchuks, yet).
Title: RE:That $250 price tag again...
Post by: GoldenPhoenix on September 19, 2006, 05:16:24 PM
I wasn't sure which topic to post this in but I guess this is the best one and it is in response to the ridiculouse statements that Xbox 360 core has HD while Wii does not. Let's turn this argument around and approach it from the Wii's point of view. With Wii are getting a new way to play games, integrated Wifi, web brower, ability to upload movies (I do not believe this is possible with Xbox 360). Not only that but you get a compact system leaving open room for other items etc etc. Guess what you get NONE of that on Xbox 360 and for only 250$. See there is a much different way of looking at things other than "Wii doesn't have HD while Xbox 360 does".
Title: RE: That $250 price tag again...
Post by: SixthAngel on September 19, 2006, 05:44:02 PM
When did the xbox360 core, dubbed the tard pack because it was such a waste, suddenly become worth picking up, ever?
Title: RE: That $250 price tag again...
Post by: Athrun Zala on September 19, 2006, 07:29:01 PM
when some people thought that by $50 more they could get HD REVOLUTION when actually they have to spend like $150 more....
Title: RE: That $250 price tag again...
Post by: IceCold on September 19, 2006, 08:00:32 PM
In Canada (since Microsoft was the only company out of the three not to adopt a 1.1 conversion ratio), the difference between a Wii and an Xbox 360 is $120 CDN. Not including a memory card. Yeah..
Title: RE:That $250 price tag again...
Post by: GoldenPhoenix on September 19, 2006, 11:23:17 PM
Quote Originally posted by: SixthAngel When did the xbox360 core, dubbed the tard pack because it was such a waste, suddenly become worth picking up, ever?
You would be amazed how many people think that, one common argument (which spawned my response) is that people will see a Wii but will think for 50$ you can get better graphics (Specifically HD), somehow forgetting that Wii has that XBox 360 does not. I'm sure this thinking would also die out when they realize they need to spend 40$ for a component cable, 40$ for a memory card, and another 50-60$ for a game.
Title: RE: That $250 price tag again...
Post by: AnyoneEB on September 20, 2006, 06:40:08 AM
VGrevolution: As the Wii does not come with a component cable, you can leave out the $40 component cable part, but your argument still holds.
Title: RE:That $250 price tag again...
Post by: GoldenPhoenix on September 20, 2006, 09:28:15 AM
Quote Originally posted by: AnyoneEB VGrevolution: As the Wii does not come with a component cable, you can leave out the $40 component cable part, but your argument still holds.
Um I was talking about the Xbox 360 and how people say you can get the core for 50$ more with HD as that being a selling point (which is why you need to add on a 40$ component cable). The Wii's 480p is not really a big selling point which is why I didn't include that.
Title: RE: That $250 price tag again...
Post by: AnyoneEB on September 20, 2006, 12:11:54 PM
Okay, sorry, I misunderstood.
Title: RE:That $250 price tag again...
Post by: RickPowers on September 20, 2006, 12:26:29 PM
Quote Originally posted by: VGrevolution
Quote Originally posted by: SixthAngel When did the xbox360 core, dubbed the tard pack because it was such a waste, suddenly become worth picking up, ever?
You would be amazed how many people think that, one common argument (which spawned my response) is that people will see a Wii but will think for 50$ you can get better graphics (Specifically HD), somehow forgetting that Wii has that XBox 360 does not. I'm sure this thinking would also die out when they realize they need to spend 40$ for a component cable, 40$ for a memory card, and another 50-60$ for a game.
The component cable is included with the Core. It also has composite hookups. I'm fairly certain it's the only cable Microsoft makes, aside from the VGA and S-Video cables.
I'd also argue that you can't include the game prices, since you could get something like Geometry Wars for $5.
Title: RE:That $250 price tag again...
Post by: GoldenPhoenix on September 20, 2006, 12:50:30 PM
Quote Originally posted by: RickPowers
Quote Originally posted by: VGrevolution
Quote Originally posted by: SixthAngel When did the xbox360 core, dubbed the tard pack because it was such a waste, suddenly become worth picking up, ever?
You would be amazed how many people think that, one common argument (which spawned my response) is that people will see a Wii but will think for 50$ you can get better graphics (Specifically HD), somehow forgetting that Wii has that XBox 360 does not. I'm sure this thinking would also die out when they realize they need to spend 40$ for a component cable, 40$ for a memory card, and another 50-60$ for a game.
The component cable is included with the Core. It also has composite hookups. I'm fairly certain it's the only cable Microsoft makes, aside from the VGA and S-Video cables.
I'd also argue that you can't include the game prices, since you could get something like Geometry Wars for $5.
I'm going by realistically since realistically people are not going to play Xbox Live games ONLY, not only that but one Xbox Live game will probaly take up half of your memory card. BTW Rick you only get the AV cable with the core package (at least in the U.S.) so you get no HD out of the box. This is according to Eb games. Not only that but from what I've read you cannot do any Marketplace stuff (Or if you can it is very limited) with the memory card, but then again I'm not sure since I own the premium system.
Anyway this is what the core system includes: * Contains: - Microsoft XBOX 360 console - wired controller - standard AV cable - XBOX Live Silver Service - White faceplate
Title: RE: That $250 price tag again...
Post by: Athrun Zala on September 20, 2006, 09:01:27 PM
according to the X360 page, the Core comes with just a AV cable....no component
Title: RE:That $250 price tag again...
Post by: GoldenPhoenix on September 20, 2006, 10:18:55 PM
Quote Originally posted by: Athrun Zala according to the X360 page, the Core comes with just a AV cable....no component
Yep so even if you disregard the game you are still looking at 80$ to take advantage of HD along with something to save your data on!
Title: RE: That $250 price tag again...
Post by: Athrun Zala on September 21, 2006, 07:21:47 AM
funny, you buy an X360 for the HD REVOLUTION and you lack the components to actually USE IT'S SELLING POINT