Nintendo World Report Forums

Gaming Forums => General Gaming => Topic started by: Shecky on May 08, 2006, 06:26:23 PM

Title: Differences Between PS3 Packages
Post by: Shecky on May 08, 2006, 06:26:23 PM
Package 1
-------------
$500 USD
20GB HDD
0 HDMI port
NO Memory Stick, SD, or Compact Flash reading capability
NO WiFi support


Package 2
-------------
$600 USD
60GB HDD
1 HDMI port
Memory Stick reading capability (this is SONY, it's only going to be one)
WiFi support


I'll try to edit this post as more details surface.

Title: RE:Differences Between PS3 Packages
Post by: vudu on May 08, 2006, 06:29:54 PM
From BigJim:  PS3 20 Gig Missing Features?
Quote

Looking at the official press site of SCEA, we noticed that the PS3 with the 20 gigabyte hard drive seemed to lack HDMI support. This seems to be confirmed by an offical press release from SCEA, which indicates via comparison between the two systems. However, it also indicates that the 20 gigabyte system won't have Memory Stick, SD or Compact Flash reading capability or WiFi support.
Quote

When Microsoft launched the Xbox 360, consumers hated the Core system that didn't come with a hard drive and other features, quickly dubbing it the "tard pack."
I've never heard the expression tard pack in my life.  It's genius.
Title: RE:Differences Between PS3 Packages
Post by: Arbok on May 08, 2006, 07:10:36 PM
Quote

Originally posted by: vudu
I've never heard the expression tard pack in my life.  It's genius.

http://www.penny-arcade.com/comic/2005/11/23
Title: RE: Differences Between PS3 Packages
Post by: BranDonk Kong on May 08, 2006, 07:24:20 PM
Either one you get you're blowing a shitload of money on a system that has failed to deliver already. I've owned every "real" console since the NES (aside from Genesis/32X), and there's no way in Hell I'll spend $500 on a PS3, especially such a crippled system. It's $100 more than the Xbox 360 premium, and offers less.
Title: RE: Differences Between PS3 Packages
Post by: Shecky on May 09, 2006, 03:32:38 AM
I also hope that no one is surprised that the dual 1080p support is gone (well multiple display support is gone) as are some of the other features from when it was first announced.  Not there even with the most expensive system...
Title: RE:Differences Between PS3 Packages
Post by: couchmonkey on May 09, 2006, 05:05:08 AM
Question for tech-heads: does the exclusion of HDMI mean that you just have to go out and buy some cables or some other easy-to-install thing for the core system to display HDTV, or does it mean that you effectively have no HDTV capabilities without modding the machine?
Title: RE:Differences Between PS3 Packages
Post by: Nephilim on May 09, 2006, 05:26:32 AM
from what iv heard it will still be able to output 780
just not 1080
which is sad, since 360 can do it out of the box
Title: RE: Differences Between PS3 Packages
Post by: Renny on May 09, 2006, 06:26:58 AM
Blu-Ray is suppsoded to require HDMI. So if you want to see Blu-Ray in its full-res glory, you need the Non-Tard Pack.
Title: RE: Differences Between PS3 Packages
Post by: Requiem on May 09, 2006, 07:34:41 AM
I could buy a pool table with that money and be infinetly happier.


Well done, Sony, well done.
Title: RE: Differences Between PS3 Packages
Post by: couchmonkey on May 09, 2006, 12:45:55 PM
Thanks Renny.  Sony is dumb.
Title: RE: Differences Between PS3 Packages
Post by: nitsu niflheim on May 09, 2006, 01:36:09 PM
What I hear is that the cheap PS3 option will NOT be upgradable, in respect to the HDMI and Memory Stick reading capability, and probably WiFi support.

Stupid, just plain stupid.  

Go for the cheaper avenue to save, and you are screwed for life with that system.
Title: RE:Differences Between PS3 Packages
Post by: Athrun Zala on May 09, 2006, 02:56:45 PM
Quote

Originally posted by: Renny
Blu-Ray is suppsoded to require HDMI. So if you want to see Blu-Ray in its full-res glory, you need the Non-Tard Pack.

actually, Sony was pushing studios not to apply the ICT (Image Constrain Token, that is, to not be able to get full-res from component cables) for a while they said they wouldn't apply it for a long time.

at the time I found that odd, now I can see why..........
Title: RE: Differences Between PS3 Packages
Post by: Renny on May 09, 2006, 04:47:26 PM
So they reversed their decision on that? Maybe that was in response to HD-DVD loosening its restraints?
Title: RE:Differences Between PS3 Packages
Post by: Athrun Zala on May 09, 2006, 06:06:20 PM
Quote

Originally posted by: Renny
So they reversed their decision on that? Maybe that was in response to HD-DVD loosening its restraints?

most likely

also, it wouldn't be nice to spend $1000+ on a BD Player only to find out that you can't get full HD (barely ED) because your TV doesn't have the lastest Hollywood-approved full of DRM HDMI input.......
Title: RE: Differences Between PS3 Packages
Post by: BlackNMild2k1 on May 09, 2006, 08:36:16 PM
I just have one thing to add to this discussion, it was a thought that I had last nite that didn't really make sense to me.
PS3 communicates wirelessly with PSP for connectivity right.

And Sony has a game that takes advantage of that feature, some F1 racing game that uses the PSP as a rear view mirror(which would have made sense if the PSP also acted as the controller), and does so wirelessly.

PSP can only communicate wirelessy through wifi right?

So why does the PS3 Premium support Wifi and the PS3 Tard pack not?

If they plan on using connectivity in any sort of usefull way, wouldn't you want to include wifi in all models?
Title: RE: Differences Between PS3 Packages
Post by: IceCold on May 09, 2006, 08:56:00 PM
I'm not sure, but I don't think they use WiFi for the PSP connectivity - it's probably Bluetooth or something..
Title: RE: Differences Between PS3 Packages
Post by: nickmitch on May 10, 2006, 05:49:15 PM
If it's Bluetooth for the controller, then it's Bluetooth for the PSP.
It's only logical.
Title: RE: Differences Between PS3 Packages
Post by: BlackNMild2k1 on May 10, 2006, 06:51:50 PM
I didn't know the PSP supported bluetooth
Title: RE:Differences Between PS3 Packages
Post by: IceCold on May 10, 2006, 11:17:30 PM
Oh, and just when you thought that Kutaragi had passed the limits of insanity, here's a quote from him..

"It's probably too cheap."
Title: RE: Differences Between PS3 Packages
Post by: Shecky on May 13, 2006, 06:56:26 PM
So... another question.  Is Sony offering an "upgrade path" to those that buy the cheaper system?  I can't really see how, which is just devestating IMO.
Title: RE:Differences Between PS3 Packages
Post by: Athrun Zala on May 13, 2006, 07:17:33 PM
Quote

Originally posted by: Shecky
So... another question.  Is Sony offering an "upgrade path" to those that buy the cheaper system?  I can't really see how, which is just devestating IMO.

ummm.....selling it and buying the premium one?

or they could just wait until the lens breaks.......
Title: RE: Differences Between PS3 Packages
Post by: King of Twitch on May 15, 2006, 10:27:10 AM
There will be a great disturbance in the force when the first batch of PS3s begin breaking down.  
Title: RE: Differences Between PS3 Packages
Post by: nitsu niflheim on May 15, 2006, 11:01:33 AM
I agree.  Sony is not known for the same quality that Nintendo is known for, so I suspect that the PS3's first initial batch will have its fair share of problems, and forking over either 500 or 600 dollars is too much when you know you are running the risk of having a problem.  If you thought the Xbox 360 had problems with just a DVD drive, then image what you'll have with the Blu-Ray drive!
Title: RE:Differences Between PS3 Packages
Post by: Arbok on May 15, 2006, 08:09:54 PM
Quote

Originally posted by: nitsu niflheim
If you thought the Xbox 360 had problems with just a DVD drive, then image what you'll have with the Blu-Ray drive!


Well yeah, but how many people are actually going to buy Blu-Ray? I mean, this could be something where someone buys a Blu-Ray disc 6 months after getting the system for the first time... only to find that their $600 system might have a broken competent in doing that correctly. So some, if there are problems, might find out that fact way too late unlike with something more commonly used like a DVD drive, where errors can be spotted and one can return the unit with the receipt in a short amount of time.

Although, if Blu-Ray is going to end up like this generation's Laserdisc, which I imagine it might, then the owner of the PS3 might not even care a great deal that the feature doesn't work...
Title: RE: Differences Between PS3 Packages
Post by: KDR_11k on May 16, 2006, 01:22:17 AM
Keep in mind that the games for the PS3 will be BRD based as well and if the drive fails the entire console fails.
Title: RE: Differences Between PS3 Packages
Post by: nitsu niflheim on May 16, 2006, 04:36:50 AM
I was basically saying that if MS was having problems with a plain old DVD drive, just imagine the problems you could have with a BRD drive and your PS3, especially knowing Sony track record and customer service; pretend that there is no problem and hope it will go away.  
Title: RE: Differences Between PS3 Packages
Post by: capamerica on May 16, 2006, 01:27:50 PM
Quote

According to Games Radar a few more features will be missing on the PS3 if you decided to pass on the $600 model and go with the "cheaper" core model. We have already been told by Sony that if people buy the $500 PS3 Core unit they will lose out on features like Wi-Fi, HDMI, and memory card support. But according to Games Radar there are 2 more features that will also be missing that could very well turn people off on the $500 model. Wireless controller support and an upgradable hard-drive are also on that list of features that will NOT be supported in the $500 PS3.
While the Xbox 360 Core system doesn't ship with wireless controllers, it does support them; however, Games Radar writes that "wireless Bluetooth controllers won't be supported" in the lower-priced PS3.

Similarly, whereas the Xbox 360 Core system didn't ships with a hard-drive, it is possible to add one and match the functionality of the more expensive offering. Games Radar writes that a "Sony representative on the show floor at E3 also emphasized that gamers won't be able to upgrade the memory of the 20GB version."

It seems that Sony is once again screwing over their loyal Playstation fanbase.
This news has left this fan wondering Is Final Fantasy XIII and Meta Gear Solid 4 really worth the $600 price tag?
Title: RE: Differences Between PS3 Packages
Post by: Shecky on May 16, 2006, 03:02:14 PM
Sony PS3 partially upgradeable.

GI Link

Looks like some of the features will be upgradeable by means of USB adapters...  mainly wireless (WiFi) and the card readers.  HDMI output is not upgradable.  HDD can be swapped for a larger disk... after all, it is just "a computer, after all."

Title: RE: Differences Between PS3 Packages
Post by: nitsu niflheim on May 16, 2006, 04:41:33 PM
That's just not the same.  There is no logical reason for Sony to have two options.  It would make sense if one were priced at 299.99.
Title: RE: Differences Between PS3 Packages
Post by: capamerica on May 16, 2006, 07:12:33 PM
Truth be told I really won't believe anything that comes out of Sony or News sites on what will and won't be upgradeable in the PS3. Sony could easily say everything is upgradeable and then when the system is released we find out nothing is. Also Just because Sony says USB add-ons "could" be released doesn't mean they will.

Anyone one who is thinking of getting a PS3 should really hold off until it is released just incase Sony pulls a fast one and the Core system isn't upgradeable like they say.  
Title: RE: Differences Between PS3 Packages
Post by: Athrun Zala on May 17, 2006, 05:28:27 PM
Iread somewhere (can't remember right now) that the HDD is NOT upgradeable
Title: RE:Differences Between PS3 Packages
Post by: Grant10k on May 18, 2006, 06:19:24 AM
Quote

Originally posted by: Athrun Zala
Iread somewhere (can't remember right now) that the HDD is NOT upgradeable


I read somewhere that the hard drive is upgradable to anything you want
Quote

...it is a computer, after all.
Title: RE: Differences Between PS3 Packages
Post by: Athrun Zala on May 18, 2006, 06:18:34 PM
oh well, that should be better......unless the HDD is over $100......

nevertheless, is odd to see Sony going back and forth with these things, maybe we wont know what's upgradeable and what's not until launch day
Title: RE: Differences Between PS3 Packages
Post by: Grant10k on May 18, 2006, 06:54:34 PM
That sounds accurate.
Title: RE: Differences Between PS3 Packages
Post by: nitsu niflheim on May 19, 2006, 04:31:39 AM
and a cheap way to screw over consumers.
Title: RE: Differences Between PS3 Packages
Post by: vudu on May 19, 2006, 09:19:47 AM
I never really thought about this until just now, but hasn't it been reported the the $600 version of the PS3 will include SD and CompactFlash support?  Is this a first for a Sony product?  I thought everything of theirs used the Sony brand memory stick format?
Title: RE: Differences Between PS3 Packages
Post by: Shecky on May 19, 2006, 05:52:09 PM
Yeah it would be a first in my book.... something exists other than memory stick?  Say it aint so Sony, say it aint so!

(Seriously, their PC's do read multiple formats, but it sure took them a while to come to that.  The laptops only do mem sticks, IIRC.)