Title: RE:Revolution not a "next generation" console
Post by: S-U-P-E-R on February 28, 2006, 10:06:13 PM
Title: RE: Revolution not a "next generation" console
Post by: Infernal Monkey on February 28, 2006, 10:30:47 PM
Title: RE: Revolution not a "next generation" console
Post by: ruby_onix on March 01, 2006, 01:19:43 AM
Mario Kart Online is the kind of revolutionary idea that could only come from Nintendo.
Apparently new generation = last generation. Not counting the one we're currently exiting. That's much better than next gen. Especially considering Nintendo's downward spiral.
Title: RE: Revolution not a "next generation" console
Post by: Pale on March 01, 2006, 04:19:45 AM
Would it be bad if I changed Ruby's title to "Ian jr."?
Title: RE:Revolution not a "next generation" console
Post by: MaryJane on March 01, 2006, 05:54:37 AM
Lol nice one pale, and love the pic of perrin, that's how i dream of her. of course she's also in my bed when i dream of her, but thats a story for another day. Long live the new-generation
Title: RE: Revolution not a "next generation" console
Post by: ruby_onix on March 01, 2006, 12:04:26 PM
I'm older than Ian.
And no, you can't mess with the title.
Title: RE: Revolution not a "next generation" console
Post by: Smash_Brother on March 01, 2006, 03:59:45 PM
Just add "and Ian-in-Training" to the end of it, or "Student Ian", "Ian's Apprentice" or whatnot.
Title: RE: Revolution not a "next generation" console
Post by: Mario on March 01, 2006, 04:30:01 PM
Ian Lite
Title: RE: Revolution not a "next generation" console
Post by: Smash_Brother on March 01, 2006, 06:35:16 PM
Mini-Ian
Title: RE: Revolution not a "next generation" console
Post by: TrueNerd on March 01, 2006, 09:37:16 PM
Who's Nintendo fooling? They keep talking about how they're not competing with anyone. That's like Canada saying they're not competing with Mexico for the title of "USA's Favorite Neighbor." It's all chicannery, I say!
Title: RE: Revolution not a "next generation" console
Post by: UncleBob on March 02, 2006, 05:14:40 AM
Canada isn't competing with Mexico - Canada already has it. No one complains about and tries to shoot illegal Canadians crossing the border.
Title: RE:Revolution not a "next generation" console
Post by: ShyGuy on March 02, 2006, 05:27:38 AM
We may not shoot the canadians. but...
Mexican food is better than Canadian food Less people vacation in Canada than Mexico Who is more attractive? Canadian ladies or Mexican ladies?
Ergo, Nintendo Revolution is Cuba!
Title: RE: Revolution not a "next generation" console
Post by: Hostile Creation on March 02, 2006, 06:33:11 AM
Actually, someone told me that Montreal had the most beautiful women he'd ever seen in one place. More than New York, which is saying something.
That's in Canada, right?
Title: RE:Revolution not a "next generation" console
Post by: MaryJane on March 02, 2006, 06:45:27 AM
we trade more with canada than with any other country. Canadians win! although there are some fine mexican mamcitas but not a majority.
Title: RE:Revolution not a "next generation" console
Post by: Smash_Brother on March 02, 2006, 09:46:15 AM
Quote Originally posted by: Hostile Creation Actually, someone told me that Montreal had the most beautiful women he'd ever seen in one place. More than New York, which is saying something.
That's in Canada, right?
Yes, and I can shed some light on this.
Quebec City (which is one giant tourist trap, yet one of the nicest places I've ever seen), was like a giant Natalie Portman look-alike contest. Each girl was more attractive than the last.
I later learned, however (from a Canadian friend who lives around the area), this is due to the fact that the girls there are trying to bag a wealthy, american husband. Because of this, they live in apartments which are basically closets, have very little furniture, and spend every penny they make on beauty products in the hopes of finding that rich guy.
The only people who drive to Canada for a vacation are those who can't afford a real vacation or american teenagers looking to drink and cannot legally do so in the US. In either case, these aren't the groups I would be looking to hit up for money.
Title: RE:Revolution not a "next generation" console
Post by: IceCold on March 02, 2006, 12:12:46 PM
Quote Mexican food is better than Canadian food Less people vacation in Canada than Mexico Who is more attractive? Canadian ladies or Mexican ladies?
1. Wrong; in big cities you can get great food, and the variety is awesome (a lot to do with the multiculturalism). Ginger beef was invented in Calgary..
2. Less people get Hepatitis A while vacationing in Canada
3. Canadians in a landslide
And SB, who the hell is that Canadian friend?
Title: RE:Revolution not a "next generation" console
Post by: TrueNerd on March 02, 2006, 10:18:48 PM
Quote Originally posted by: Smash_Brother
Quote Originally posted by: Hostile Creation Actually, someone told me that Montreal had the most beautiful women he'd ever seen in one place. More than New York, which is saying something.
That's in Canada, right?
Yes, and I can shed some light on this.
Quebec City (which is one giant tourist trap, yet one of the nicest places I've ever seen), was like a giant Natalie Portman look-alike contest. Each girl was more attractive than the last.
Don't you think that Keira Knightley and Winona Ryder both kind've look like Portman? Regardless, Knightley is the hottest of them all because of her sexy accent. Natalie Portman has gone downhill since she was in "The Professional."