Post by: Juno on August 07, 2004, 10:32:37 AM
Post by: DrZoidberg on August 07, 2004, 11:13:51 AM
Post by: StrikerObi on August 07, 2004, 01:43:10 PM
Post by: ThePerm on August 07, 2004, 03:29:35 PM
Post by: Bill Aurion on August 07, 2004, 03:37:16 PM
Post by: Random_Black_Dude on August 07, 2004, 06:38:44 PM
Quote
Like the end of Windwaker when link stabs Ganondorf in the head, there was no blood, i thought to myself if you stab someone in the head im know that blood will come out of the head.
Well he turned to stone. Stone people don't have blood.
Post by: chain chomp on September 03, 2004, 12:38:48 PM
Post by: Cube_King on September 03, 2004, 11:27:54 PM
Quote
Originally posted by: chain chomp
if ninty put blood in it it might not sell so well cos ww attracted aqlot of new younger games to zelda the new zelda might get a 16 so younger gamers wont play it until 2014 when revolution 2 and mario 20064 x 99
I totally disagree with everything you just said. The market is full of casual gamers, all they want is blood and gore. That's why Nintenod isn't first in the console wars, cause everyone thinks their childish. WW sold less than the mature-looking OOT & MM. Also, since when would having a 16+ rating chase away all the younger gamers? I've seen 9 year olds play GTA.
Post by: mjbd on September 14, 2004, 04:40:27 PM
Post by: odifiend on September 14, 2004, 05:03:57 PM
Damn you MM, it's your fault!
Post by: MaleficentOgre on September 15, 2004, 01:55:59 PM
Post by: KDR_11k on September 15, 2004, 09:50:54 PM
Post by: Dirk Temporo on October 05, 2004, 03:04:04 PM
You realize you're an idiot, right? The world will explode before Miyamoto will ever let them put blood in a Zelda game.
Post by: MaleficentOgre on October 10, 2004, 08:04:52 PM
Post by: PaLaDiN on October 10, 2004, 08:22:55 PM
Post by: chain chomp on October 11, 2004, 10:53:56 AM
Post by: odifiend on October 11, 2004, 11:44:59 AM
. That is enough for most people.
Post by: Bill Aurion on October 11, 2004, 12:21:51 PM
Post by: NinGurl69 *huggles on October 11, 2004, 04:05:52 PM
I got excited about Tales of Symphonia on the simple basis it's Tales + GameCube.
Post by: Ian Sane on October 11, 2004, 07:15:03 PM
What do we need the storyline for? The storyline is always my last concern regarding a Zelda title (as it is with the game designers). I want to know what the gameplay is like. Every Zelda game has some main gameplay idea that it focuses on (wind, parallel worlds, time travel, masks, etc) and I want to know what it is for this new title. As long as the storyline isn't incredibly dumb I don't care about it.
As for getting excited already well Zelda has a pretty much flawless record so far. When the closest thing to a bad game is one "different but not necessarily bad" game released 16 years ago people are going to get excited about any new entries.
Post by: chain chomp on October 12, 2004, 06:44:28 AM
Post by: CardBoardBox on October 12, 2004, 01:08:18 PM
Quote
Originally posted by: chain chomp
i cant belive i posted that what was i on zelda never fails to impress
Wha??? You're confusing. OMG, sword fighting on horses, ITS A MUST GET.
Post by: ralph98201 on October 25, 2004, 06:13:54 PM
Post by: TMW on October 27, 2004, 08:39:24 PM
Tentative title: "The Legend of Zelda: F*&#ing Up Peoples S*@! On Horseback."
Post by: norebonomis on November 01, 2004, 01:36:25 PM
Post by: Savior on November 01, 2004, 02:36:02 PM
Well Link is the Savior, Only he can Save Nintendo from Third PartieS Jumping Ship, and Crappy Hardware Sales. Worship the Savior Link!
Post by: Hostile Creation on November 01, 2004, 07:51:18 PM
Quote
Tentative title: "The Legend of Zelda: F*&#ing Up Peoples S*@! On Horseback."
Holy freakin' hell this made me laugh. This is a good thread, I guess you gotta look around to find them.
