50
« on: December 07, 2008, 09:05:29 PM »
as I've changed the way I play games I've stopped giving much if any credence to reviews. It's not the reviewers fault, I'm just not in the audience anymore. Most reviews are generally good for two to six months. And as long as any game below say 8.5 or so is crap then the whole process is a joke. All media is biased because they experiance things in a certain way, and no matter how hard they try it isn't the same as a lot of people. The most common game complaint about another game doing the same thing before is absurd to anyone who hasn't played that game.
If RE5 is just like RE4 then all you're going to hear is how it's RE4 in Africa. But to anyone who didn't play RE4 and maybe only has a 360 or a non bc ps3 then playing RE4 isn't an option and their enjoyment won't be effected in any way at all by how similar it is or isn't to the prior game.
So yeah, reviews are pretty useless as they're currently written. Needs more island criticism.
Also, mediocre and bad are really subjective. Excellent game design is totally subjective. If you got Gears 2 for online play and it takes you five minutes to get to a match this game everyone loves is mostly garbage for you.