Let's clear up a little bit of your misconceptions about Wal*Mart, buddy.
First off, Wal*Mart doesn't "eat up" small businesses. Wal*Mart offers services and products at low prices. Individual customers make the choice of shopping at Wal*Mart or continuing to support the small businesses. When customers decide not to support small businesses (for whatever reason), either the small business must change their business model to attract these customers back or go out of business. Wal*Mart doesn't move into town and start shutting down businesses - they close down because the business has failed to attract enough customers to keep it going. Would you perfer that Wal*Mart raise their prices (thus making more profit for Wal*Mart) just to allow small businesses to remain competitive? Or how about the proposal that requires Wal*Mart People Greeters to ask each shopper entering the store to present a receipt from a local small business before they're allowed to shop there? There are plenty of mom and pop stores that have managed to survive and strive in a world of Wal*Marts. They find a nitch that Wal*Mart doesn't cover or they make up for their higher prices in damn good service, quality or sales staff. The stores that don't make it... well, apparently the customers didn't like them enough to keep them in business, eh?
As per starting pay - I have worked in 7 different Wal*Marts and I can't think of a single one that starts out at "minimum wage". The store I'm at now actually starts an individual with no previous job history in a basic position at 50 cents above state minimum wage and is (sadly) one of the higher paying jobs in my community. After about four years with Wal*Mart, I'm making over twice state minimum wage, which, considering the area and the fact that the job pretty much requires no special skills means that I'm doing pretty good. What's the starting rate at one of your beloved Small Businesses?
As per the Chicago law - that law was bull crap and we all know it. Aside from the fact that minimum wage laws are unconstitutional and hurt job growth (not to mention the number of jobs that go overseas because of this kind of crap), the idea of two business who have employees that do basically the same exact job being forced by the government to pay one set of employees extra because they have more employees, well, that's asinine. If you want to set a minimum wage, then do it - don't make exclusions or you're just going to wind up hurting the free market.
Unions? Bah. Don't need 'em. How many jobs have went overseas because of unions?
Health Care? Health Care is an individual's responsibility. Somewhere along the way, this idea has been lost and now everyone from employers to the government is expected to take care of our health care costs (meanwhile, we lazy americans continue to eat our horribly unhealthy food, not exercise, smoke, drink, have unprotected sex, etc., etc and then wonder why our health care costs are so high...)
Anywhoo, beyond that, Wal*Mart does offer fairly affordable health care that really doesn't suck too badly - and is way better than what you're likely to get working at Mom and Pop stores. Which is absolutly nothing.
Is Wal*Mart a perfect company? Hells no. But at least have a clue what you're talking about before you blurt stuff out like "Wal*Mart kills small businesses"...