Nintendo World Report Forums

Gaming Forums => General Gaming => Topic started by: Chongman on September 27, 2004, 12:48:08 PM

Title: PSP PRICE ANNOUNCED!!!
Post by: Chongman on September 27, 2004, 12:48:08 PM
http://gcadvanced.com/article.php?artid=3307

*smirk*...*chuckle* BAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA



yay...  

DrZ moderates using a chainsaw on this day, I'm mangling this thread into an official type PSP thread, given it will be out soon and I'd rather not have a hojillion threads about PSP.
Title: RE: PSP PRICE ANNOUNCED!!!
Post by: couchmonkey on September 27, 2004, 01:11:22 PM
OMH!  I kept thinking everyone was being a little too paranoid, claiming the PSP would retail for $300+, but here we go...that is fricking ridiculous!  I imagine a large price drop will occur in the first 1/2 of 2005....if Sony has any brains left.

If PSP beats DS now, I'll probably wind up in a mental asylum.
Title: RE: PSP PRICE ANNOUNCED!!!
Post by: Bill Aurion on September 27, 2004, 01:11:23 PM
350 dollars...Please, Sony...What could possibly justify me buying a "portable" "PS2" with inferior graphics for a price greater than the PS2 was?  ABSOLUTELY NOTHING... -_-
Title: RE: PSP PRICE ANNOUNCED!!!
Post by: Ian Sane on September 27, 2004, 01:19:50 PM
$350?!!  That's insane!  I was reading rumours of $250 or $300 which I thought was pretty high.  For the price to be EVEN HIGHER then what people were worried about is just bizarre.  Does Sony honestly think that people will pay MORE than the PS2 did at launch for this?

In Canada this will cost around $445 which interestingly enough is actually cheaper than the PS2 or the Saturn when they launched here.  That's kind of neat but this still is too expensive.

How reliable is the source?  I haven't seen this anywhere else and it's so high that it's unbelievable.
Title: RE: PSP PRICE ANNOUNCED!!!
Post by: ruby_onix on September 27, 2004, 01:30:51 PM
N-Philes says that the GameSpot story got pulled for violating an NDA.
Title: RE: PSP PRICE ANNOUNCED!!!
Post by: Ian Sane on September 27, 2004, 01:40:07 PM
Did the guys at N-Phile or GCAdvanced actually SEE the Gamespot headline or are they just going on some forum members say so?
Title: RE: PSP PRICE ANNOUNCED!!!
Post by: MaleficentOgre on September 27, 2004, 01:49:10 PM
Its not real yet, but sony's not denying it to be true.  The real shocker as far as news goes is the fact that you'll need a $30 memory card for the games.  In all likelyhood its proprietary so you can't use any other cards.  I knew we were going to need memory cards, but 30 is a little steep for a handheld.
Title: RE: PSP PRICE ANNOUNCED!!!
Post by: Ian Sane on September 27, 2004, 02:10:43 PM
According to the Penny Arcade forum it's already been debunked as a hoax.  They say some guy issued a fake press release which Gamespot, being the professional journalists they are, believed was real and reported on only to take it down later.

This would make sense.  Even with Sony's step-by-step "what not to do when launching a new portable" approach to the PSP $350 seems steep enough that even they wouldn't go with it.
Title: RE: PSP PRICE ANNOUNCED!!!
Post by: ruby_onix on September 27, 2004, 02:10:59 PM
Quote

Did the guys at N-Phile or GCAdvanced actually SEE the Gamespot headline or are they just going on some forum members say so?

I don't know.

But $350 just wouldn't surprise me. A year ago Chris Deering (the President of SCEE) slipped, and said that the PSP hardware would sell (with no money loss) for $450. Since then Sony's only statements have been "that's not confirmed yet", "no, we'll lose SOME money on the hardware, we just can't say how much", and "please stop talking about the price".

If you're losing $50 on the hardware, you're losing "PlayStation money".

If you're losing $100 on the hardware, you're losing "XBox money".

More than that? That just seems unheard of.

Quote

The real shocker as far as news goes is the fact that you'll need a $30 memory card for the games. In all likelyhood its proprietary so you can't use any other cards.

That's Sony's "Memory Stick". They make them for digital cameras, and that kind of thing. The PSP is disk-based, so it needs some sort of memory cards. And Sony decided that we should be using their Memory Stick format. They're expensive, but the ARE really big (and you can get MUCH bigger and more expensive than the basic $30 ones).

If you want to use the PSP as an MP3 Player (which is back on it's list of features again), you'll need to hook the Memory Stick up to your computer to load it up with MP3s, because you can't get MP3s onto the UMD disks.
Title: RE: PSP PRICE ANNOUNCED!!!
Post by: - NintendoFan - on September 27, 2004, 02:40:04 PM
Well, that price just makes the DS look more attractive at $150.
Title: RE:PSP PRICE ANNOUNCED!!!
Post by: Chongman on September 27, 2004, 02:48:43 PM

Quote

According to the Penny Arcade forum


whoa whoa whoa, it's the penny arcade forum. I dont know how much we can trust people who worship the likes of twisp and catsby and live in a forum with no rules :-P. jk
Title: RE:PSP PRICE ANNOUNCED!!!
Post by: Rancid Planet on September 27, 2004, 03:22:58 PM
In all honesty when this was pointed out to me, I didn't at first believe it. But after a few other sources began confiming it I took it as truth and posted the news myself at the site I work for. So now that my reputaion is on the line as well, I like others, are hoping it isn't totally debunked. heh

However, operating on the topic as if it IS in fact true, I don't think Sony respects Nintendo at all now. The PSP is direct competition for the DS yet they act as though there is no DS and they can price their system at whatever mark they want. As Marvin the Martian once said "This makes me very angry!"
Title: RE:PSP PRICE ANNOUNCED!!!
Post by: Chongman on September 27, 2004, 03:27:56 PM

I'm starting to tell sony-fanboys and they're screaming at me like mad. LIKE MAD. It's fun to watch.
Title: RE: PSP PRICE ANNOUNCED!!!
Post by: - NintendoFan - on September 27, 2004, 03:31:52 PM
"I don't think Sony respects Nintendo at all now."

You know, now that I think about it, it's pretty much true. But that kind of thinking will lead the PSP to failure. Because anybody can see that if the PSP is priced at $350 and they factor in that it is a handheld system, I can't see anyone paying that much for it.
Title: RE:PSP PRICE ANNOUNCED!!!
Post by: HereticPB on September 27, 2004, 03:42:33 PM
The price story is iffy. GameSpot had removed the article. Now GCA has removed the article as well. Either it is a really good fake or there is some Non Discloser Agreement cover up work going on.
Title: RE: PSP PRICE ANNOUNCED!!!
Post by: NinGurl69 *huggles on September 27, 2004, 03:50:24 PM
"really good fake" huh?

"really bad journalism".  Yeah, that's it.  Gamespot baka.
Title: RE: PSP PRICE ANNOUNCED!!!
Post by: - NintendoFan - on September 27, 2004, 03:59:31 PM
At this point in time it is clearly fake. But I think it gives us some indication that the PSP price point is going to be rather high or much higher then anyone as thought.
Title: RE: *rumor*PSP PRICE ANNOUNCED!!!
Post by: Zach on September 27, 2004, 05:05:58 PM
just goes to show you that Sony, in their success, has gotten arrogant (I know that price is not official, but we know that the price will be HIGH for the psp)  They think people will buy a mega-expensive hand-held, becouse it is from sony.  Unfortunately, sony is not the first to do this, we all know that Nintendo's arrogance is what put them way behind sony in the days of the N64.  Of course some rich snobby kids will buy it just for the hype, which I am sure sony will generate, but the sales of the psp are probably not gonna be very good.

Fortunatly it looks like nintendo will still have the handheld market by the balls for a little longer.  
Title: RE:*rumor*PSP PRICE ANNOUNCED!!!
Post by: Uncle Rich AiAi on September 27, 2004, 07:35:01 PM
You fanboys need to re-examine what the PSP really is.  Of cause the PSP is gonna be around the $300-$350 range for what you are getting.  Sony are not targeting you people, ie: kids and college people.  They are targeting people in the mid-20s and above who like to buying expensive gadgets and so forth.  I wouldn't say Sony is downright stupid (I would like to see you run a big electronic corporation).  Sure, they have gotten arrogance over the years, but they are not stupid as you folks claim.  They are cunning, whether you like it or not.  They didn't become #1 in the consoles wars for nothing.  And keep this in mind: the GC is cheaper than the PS2.  Did that result GC > PS2 sales?  No.  That proves people are willing to pay more for a console that costs more over a cheaper one.

The handheld market will be a true test for Sony, I won't deny that.  But the PSP will have it's initial appeal to the market they are targeting.  Will it be successful?  Out sell the DS?  Only time will tell.  
Title: RE: *rumor*PSP PRICE ANNOUNCED!!!
Post by: Ian Sane on September 27, 2004, 08:56:01 PM
"They didn't become #1 in the consoles wars for nothing."

Actually they did... sort of.  If Sega didn't make a 2D console with 3D capabilities thrown in at the last minute and Nintendo hadn't made a cartridge system Sony probably wouldn't have lasted five years.  They got REALLY lucky.  Both of their competitors f*cked up huge.  The reason the PS2 is so successful is because of the Playstation name, the year head start, Nintendo's constant Cube related brain farts, and Microsoft's inability to break into Japan.  The Playstation was in the right place at the right time and they've been riding that wave ever since.  If the PSP is a success it will because of the Playstation name, NOT for any good reason.  Sony so far has made virtually ever mistake other company's have made when trying to enter the portable market.
Title: RE:*rumor*PSP PRICE ANNOUNCED!!!
Post by: King of Twitch on September 27, 2004, 09:43:15 PM
GameSpot pulled a 'CBS.'

If Nintendo were to release a handheld at $300, the media would have it on the front page, complete with editorials of how Nintendo is doomed and should go third party, etc.  
Title: RE:*rumor*PSP PRICE ANNOUNCED!!!
Post by: Rancid Planet on September 28, 2004, 12:45:29 AM
Quote

Originally posted by: Ian Sane
"They didn't become #1 in the consoles wars for nothing."

Actually they did... sort of.  If Sega didn't make a 2D console with 3D capabilities thrown in at the last minute and Nintendo hadn't made a cartridge system Sony probably wouldn't have lasted five years.  They got REALLY lucky.  Both of their competitors f*cked up huge.  The reason the PS2 is so successful is because of the Playstation name, the year head start, Nintendo's constant Cube related brain farts, and Microsoft's inability to break into Japan.  The Playstation was in the right place at the right time and they've been riding that wave ever since.  If the PSP is a success it will because of the Playstation name, NOT for any good reason.  Sony so far has made virtually ever mistake other company's have made when trying to enter the portable market.


I couldn't have said it better myself. (Which is why I didn't and quoted your post)

At any rate, best post ever.
Title: RE: *rumor*PSP PRICE ANNOUNCED!!!
Post by: Mario on September 28, 2004, 03:20:23 AM
Except the PSP has over 100 games planned for it and it doesn't launch until next year... which no other handheld could claim previously. That may not mean much to you, but idiots will look and see "wow, that's a lot of games! what is this system? hmmm, PSP? oh its by sony! its like playstation! playstation has lots of games! let me open my wallet!".
Title: RE: *rumor*PSP PRICE ANNOUNCED!!!
Post by: odifiend on September 28, 2004, 04:33:56 AM
But Mario, at 350 bones most people can't afford it.  And who cares about how many games there are if you can't afford the system.  I think people, like Sony, give too much credit to the purchasing power of teenagers.  Most working teens wouldn't make that money in a month, even if they were willing to spend their entire pay check.  Part of the appeal of the GBA is that it is pretty cheap.  Relative to the PSP, so is the PS2.  I really don't think we're going to see PS2 entire fan base transfer over.  Price will sober people up more than you think.

IMO, even 300 is ludicrous for a handheld and an impractical walkman.  Oh and something that plays proprietary movies that I'll never be able to find.

"Sony are not targeting you people, ie: kids and college people. They are targeting people in the mid-20s and above who like to buying expensive gadgets and so forth."
I don't agree.  The video game market is almost entirely comprised of teenagers and 'college people'.  I don't think it would be worth Sony's while to make a gaming system they'll likely lose money on for maybe 10% of the gaming population.
Title: RE:*rumor*PSP PRICE ANNOUNCED!!!
Post by: joshnickerson on September 28, 2004, 04:53:18 AM
Quote

Originally posted by: MJRx9000

If Nintendo were to release a handheld at $300, the media would have it on the front page, complete with editorials of how Nintendo is doomed and should go third party, etc.


Just what I was thinking... but then again, they do that every time Nintendo announces ANYTHING.

Title: RE: *rumor*PSP PRICE ANNOUNCED!!!
Post by: couchmonkey on September 28, 2004, 05:41:55 AM
I think Uncle Rich AiAi is right about Sony's plan to try to sell the PSP to rich, gadget-crazy guys with jobs, but that doesn't mean it's going to work.  The PSP, I guess, is an interesting experiment to see just how large the adult market for videogames has become.  
I'm not sure what the answer is...this is the same mistake Sega made with its handhelds, but that was 10 years ago.  My intuition says that a PSP costing over $300 U.S. will face some major obstacles.

Edit: And since this news has been squashed...I'm going to go back to assuming it will cost less than $300 until I hear otherwise from Sony itself.  If this price was the actual price, Sony may reconsider based on the reaction from the public.
Title: RE: *rumor*PSP PRICE ANNOUNCED!!!
Post by: KDR_11k on September 28, 2004, 06:47:30 AM
I think 350 was announced as the price a while back, too, so I have inclinations to believe this even if it didn't come from an official source. At that price point it won't sell to people with little disposable income (kids, teenagers, McD employees, married people, etc). You can almost get a computer for that! And a computer can at least do somehing productive (like crashing and destroying the only copy of your thesis three days before the deadline). The PSP is competing not only with the DS and GBA, but the PS2, Xbox and GC, too. All of them are cheaper. Then there are the games. I mean, at 350 the PSP is almost competing with PDAs and that's where it draws the shortest straw. Sure, the PSP plays games for a few hours, but guess what, a PDA can do a LOT more and is much more interesting to gadget freaks. Sure, the PSP offers the most advanced graphics on the go, but seriously, at that price it should do more than graphics, a proprietary movie format and MP3. PDAs play games, too. Not the best, but still pretty nice. PDAs have WLAN, have both a huge display and touchscreen controls, have much more versatile software.
Title: RE: *rumor*PSP PRICE ANNOUNCED!!!
Post by: SgtShiversBen on September 28, 2004, 07:24:26 AM
I agree with this.  The PSP just doesn't seem like it'd work in a real world situation, but alas it will.  Paying 350 or heck, even 150 is still too much for just a handheld system that plays games and movies.  The GBA plays "movies" and games and now it's around 30$ , 80 for the SP.  The DS I think is at the breaking point of handhelds.  But it does so much more.  The PSP on the other hand just sits there and looks pretty, albeit not that much...but oh well.  I'll get one if it ever goes down to 80, but the much more "inferior" PS2 still hasn't reached that point, and it's almost 5 years old.
Title: RE:*rumor*PSP PRICE ANNOUNCED!!!
Post by: joshnickerson on September 28, 2004, 10:29:44 AM
I despise the PSP for one reason (of many)...

If it succeeds, it will kill 2-D gaming for good.
Title: RE:*rumor*PSP PRICE ANNOUNCED!!!
Post by: Zach on September 28, 2004, 11:19:46 AM
Quote

Originally posted by: Uncle Rich AiAi
keep this in mind: the GC is cheaper than the PS2.  Did that result GC > PS2 sales?  No.  That proves people are willing to pay more for a console that costs more over a cheaper one.


yes the gc is cheaper, but you have to keep in mind that the PS2 was not sony's first system (thus the name PS2).  With DS vs. PSP, sony is entering into the handheld world for the first time, and since handhelds are different from consoles, the Sony name alone may not be enouph for sony to beat the DS, but then again it may.
Title: RE: *rumor*PSP PRICE ANNOUNCED!!!
Post by: - NintendoFan - on September 28, 2004, 12:17:21 PM
"yes the gc is cheaper, but you have to keep in mind that the PS2 was not sony's first system (thus the name PS2). With DS vs. PSP, sony is entering into the handheld world for the first time, and since handhelds are different from consoles, the Sony name alone may not be enouph for sony to beat the DS, but then again it may."

Well, let's put it this way the Playstation name brand can't hurt them.
Title: RE: *rumor*PSP PRICE ANNOUNCED!!!
Post by: Pale on September 28, 2004, 01:25:50 PM
2.3 times as much is a little different than 1.5 times as much....

If the PS2 and x-box cost 470 dollars at launch i think it would be a little different...
Title: RE:*rumor*PSP PRICE ANNOUNCED!!!
Post by: Rancid Planet on September 28, 2004, 09:46:06 PM
Well this whole thing may have been debunked. See what you guys think.

If you go to this link HERE you will see two posters by the names of  "penance" and "WhiteBoySushi" who say they are from the Torch The Bridge forums. They claim that this whole thing about the PSP costing 350 dollars was created as a hoax originally intended to only fool other TTB forum members but that it spun out of control.

They provide a link HERE that leads to a TTB forums page containg the annoucement as well as the now infamous removed Gamespot article that got this whole thing underway. It's dated Sept. 24th as you'll notice and this all lends credence to the theory that the entire nintendo fansite community has been had.

So what do you guys think? It looks to me like these guys might be telling the truth. Although I know I'm gonna be doing a lot more research before I commit to believing anyone's story.  
Title: RE: *rumor*PSP PRICE ANNOUNCED!!!
Post by: KDR_11k on September 29, 2004, 07:14:54 AM
Hoax or not, I believe that's actually going to be the price (but I think I already said that...).

Pale: If? IF??? The XBox cost freakin' 480 Euros at launch! Granted, that was before the dollar dropped, but it was a few months later corrected to 300, same as the PS2's price at the time.
Title: RE: *rumor*PSP PRICE ANNOUNCED!!!
Post by: Uglydot on September 29, 2004, 11:33:22 AM
I might have opened my wallet if it had that much in it.
Title: RE: *rumor*PSP PRICE ANNOUNCED!!!
Post by: Pale on September 30, 2004, 03:11:30 AM
Who's talking about Europe.... =P
Title: RE:*rumor*PSP PRICE ANNOUNCED!!!
Post by: ichioko on September 30, 2004, 07:57:53 PM
I don't think the point about Sony's target audience with the PSP is even valid.  The success of any console depends greatly on how large the user base is, and although there are games with target audiences, the idea of targeting a console's possible buyer is just stupid, and Sony knows this.  

For example, look at the GameCube.  Most casual gamers and Sony fanboys have labelled it as a "kiddie" console, although Nintendo has stated they intend to appeal to gamers of all ages.  This reputation of GameCube's "target audience" has not helped sales, considering most gamers today are not "hard core" gamers, and wouldn't be caught dead with a purple lunchbox that plays "kid's games".  

Looking at the Playstation 2's success, it can be seen that its established base eclipses both the Xbox and GameCube.  This is the key to Sony's success with their console.  Because the PS2 has such a large user base, Sony does not have to rely on in-house games to push sales, but instead pushes a large number of third party games that appeal to a smaller fraction of the people who own a PS2.  Sony is a company that works off of sheer quantity over quality to stay alive in this industry.

The bottom line is that the high price of the PSP should not be considered to have any sort of demographic, because if companies don't sell consoles, they limit who can buy their games.  I see the speculation of the price point of $350 to be more of a realization by Sony, perhaps, that putting all those pretty specs and features in the PSP cost a lot of money.  Money which Sony is not willing to lose at a rate that Microsoft has lost because of the cost of making Xboxes.  The real challenge, therefore, is a tough balancing act of trading loss of profit on consoles with expected profit of licenced software, while maintaining an appeal to the majority of the handheld market.  IMHO, Sony is relying on their name and the PSP's technical appeal to push a ridiculously expensive piece of hardware in a market which they have no idea how to approach.  Anyone with a head on their shoulders shouldn't waste their money on buying a handheld PS2 (I can't really say portable, because it has been stated that the PSP is not meant to be played "on the go").  The real test is will the brand of Sony be able to overcome the already gigantic hurdles the PSP faces (price, battery life, funcitonality and value of extras like UMD movies and the ability to function as a quasi-walkman, and of course Nintendo)?
Title: RE:*rumor*PSP PRICE ANNOUNCED!!!
Post by: joeamis on October 01, 2004, 09:52:44 AM
Quote

Originally posted by: Ian Sane
"They didn't become #1 in the consoles wars for nothing."

Actually they did... sort of.  If Sega didn't make a 2D console with 3D capabilities thrown in at the last minute and Nintendo hadn't made a cartridge system Sony probably wouldn't have lasted five years.  They got REALLY lucky.  Both of their competitors f*cked up huge.  The reason the PS2 is so successful is because of the Playstation name, the year head start, Nintendo's constant Cube related brain farts, and Microsoft's inability to break into Japan.  The Playstation was in the right place at the right time and they've been riding that wave ever since.  If the PSP is a success it will because of the Playstation name, NOT for any good reason.  Sony so far has made virtually ever mistake other company's have made when trying to enter the portable market.


So because Sony designed the best console last generation, got all the third parties to support it, and got many to make exclusives for the PS1, among so many other things, they became #1 for nothing?  If the PS1 received more competition it still would've lasted more than 5 years, it's sold over 100,000,00 units for consoles alone.  

Sony hasn't made every mistake other companies have made in the portable market...  
Title: RE: *rumor*PSP PRICE ANNOUNCED!!!
Post by: Ian Sane on October 01, 2004, 10:00:33 AM
"So because Sony designed the best console last generation, got all the third parties to support it, and got many to make exclusives for the PS1, among so many other things, they became #1 for nothing?"

Had they done the exact same thing but Nintendo and Sega hadn't f*cked up they wouldn't be #1.  They were in the right place at the right time.  Third parties wouldn't have gone with an unproven newcomber if they weren't limited by the hardware of the N64 and Saturn.  Final Fantasy VII would have been on the N64.  Considering Square jumping ship is what caused all of the other third parties to follow and considering that game was the Playstation killer app I think it's fair to say that if Nintendo made a disc based system Sony wouldn't be #1.
Title: RE:*rumor*PSP PRICE ANNOUNCED!!!
Post by: joeamis on October 01, 2004, 10:09:35 AM
That was not the argument.  You said they became #1 for nothing of their doing.  

And yes it was Square's FF7 that got all the other third parties to jump onto PS1...  Yes the game came out 2 years after the PS came out, and that made all the companies who already were not on PS goto them lol.  The majority of companies were already developing and released tons of games themselves before FF7 came out 2 years later.....
Title: RE:*rumor*PSP PRICE ANNOUNCED!!!
Post by: BlackNMild2k1 on October 04, 2004, 02:19:02 PM
PSP Price to be annouced tomorrow?

Sony is having a Sony Dealer's Conference tomorrow

Gamefront.de
Quote

Sony plant 'PlayStation Dealers Conference' / PSP-Preisbekanntgabe?

04.10.04 - Sony hat in Japan Einladungen für eine 'PlayStation Dealers Conference' an den Fachhandel verschickt. Die Veranstaltung findet drei Mal statt: Am 05.10.04 in Tokio, am 06.10.04 in Nagoya und am 07.10.04 in Osaka.

Geplant ist, Händlern das kommende Lineup für PlayStation2 und PSP vorzustellen. Möglicherweise wird Sony dem Fachhandel auch den Preis von PSP bekanntgeben.


NE1 care to translate?
Title: RE:*rumor*PSP PRICE ANNOUNCED!!!
Post by: BlackNMild2k1 on October 04, 2004, 02:23:29 PM
actually I got it translated already (bored at work w/ 2 much free time)

Quote

Does Sony plan 'PlayStation Dealers Conference' / PSP-Preisbekanntgabe?  

04.10.04 - Sony sent in Japan invitations for one 'PlayStation Dealers Conference' at the specialty shop.  The organization takes place three times: at the 05.10.04 in Tokyo, at the 06.10.04 in Nagoya and at the 07.10.04 in Osaka.  

Planned is, to introduce dealers the coming Lineup for PLAYSTATION2 and PSP.  Possibly Sony will announce also the price of PSP to the specialty shop.  
Title: RE:*rumor*PSP PRICE ANNOUNCED!!!
Post by: Uncle Rich AiAi on October 04, 2004, 06:46:24 PM
Quote

Originally posted by: Ian Sane
Actually they did... sort of.  If Sega didn't make a 2D console with 3D capabilities thrown in at the last minute and Nintendo hadn't made a cartridge system Sony probably wouldn't have lasted five years.  They got REALLY lucky.  Both of their competitors f*cked up huge.  The reason the PS2 is so successful is because of the Playstation name, the year head start, Nintendo's constant Cube related brain farts, and Microsoft's inability to break into Japan.  The Playstation was in the right place at the right time and they've been riding that wave ever since.  If the PSP is a success it will because of the Playstation name, NOT for any good reason.  Sony so far has made virtually ever mistake other company's have made when trying to enter the portable market.

Oh really?  Yes, Sega and Nintendo made their share of mistakes as you listed, but Sony took advantage of it and released a system that was easy to develop for.  joeamis said everything else I don't need to repeat.

Quote

Originally posted by: odifiend
"Sony are not targeting you people, ie: kids and college people. They are targeting people in the mid-20s and above who like to buying expensive gadgets and so forth."

I don't agree.  The video game market is almost entirely comprised of teenagers and 'college people'.  I don't think it would be worth Sony's while to make a gaming system they'll likely lose money on for maybe 10% of the gaming population.

I didn't say whether targeting that age group will be successful.
Title: RE: *rumor*PSP PRICE ANNOUNCED!!!
Post by: Mario on October 04, 2004, 07:26:34 PM
Is this the thread where PSP news is lumped? Well whatever i'll just post this here

PSP could be delayed to as far back as November 2005

http://www.gamespot.com/news/2004/10/04/news_6109524.html
Title: RE: *rumor*PSP PRICE ANNOUNCED!!!
Post by: ruby_onix on October 04, 2004, 10:07:37 PM
Quote

Meanwhile, Piper Jaffray & Co. paints an even gloomier picture for the PSP's launch ambitions. In a report released today, the securities firm expects the handheld "to launch later than the current March 2005 expectation. First, Sony is usually late with most product introductions…and we are hearing that the platform has other issues such as thermal problems (transistors are running very hot) and a very short battery life (90 minutes) that will almost certainly delay the launch."

LOL!  
Title: RE: *rumor*PSP PRICE ANNOUNCED!!!
Post by: NinGurl69 *huggles on October 04, 2004, 10:38:34 PM
Good for arctic vacations.  Bad for arctic vacations.

Keeps ya warm, but not long enough.
Title: RE:*rumor*PSP PRICE ANNOUNCED!!!
Post by: BlackNMild2k1 on October 05, 2004, 12:20:51 AM
Professional 666
that picture of Reggie is kinda freaky
Title: RE:*rumor*PSP PRICE ANNOUNCED!!!
Post by: BlackNMild2k1 on October 05, 2004, 12:40:08 AM
according to a quote on another forum, PSP was not mentioned<sp> at the conference, which might add a little fuel to the 'being delayed till late next year, developers having problems with battery life' rumor.

Quote

I went to Sony's December retailer meeting... Tales (Rebirth), MGS3, Ratchet3, GT4, Kagerou2, FF&DQ Itadaki St., Gundam vs Z-Gundam, Kessen 3, Bleach (Jump Manga), DMC3, Capcom Fighting Jam, Simple 2000 Series... that just about covers it. There was no announcement of PSP price or release date.


Title: RE: ITT: PSP Discussion
Post by: Ian Sane on October 05, 2004, 07:27:20 AM
"a very short battery life (90 minutes)"

90 minutes?!  There's no way Sony would be THAT dumb.  I mean my parents who don't play videogames wouldn't design something with a battery life that short.

Still I find this all quite amusing.
Title: RE:ITT: PSP Discussion
Post by: BlackNMild2k1 on October 05, 2004, 05:28:15 PM
According to Sengamer.nl (scroll down the page), a developer says that PSP will be able to connect to the Xbox

Translated from dutch:
Quote

PSP, the new portable game system of Sony Computer Entertainment, would be able to make according to single game developers also a connection with the Xbox game system of Microsoft.
 
Title: RE:ITT: PSP Discussion
Post by: Chongman on October 05, 2004, 05:45:34 PM

highly doubt it
Title: RE: ITT: PSP Discussion
Post by: NinGurl69 *huggles on October 05, 2004, 06:20:36 PM
Reggie-san wa PSP o tabemasu.

Oishii desuyo!  
Title: RE: ITT: PSP Discussion
Post by: PaLaDiN on October 07, 2004, 08:23:13 PM
Reggie attacked the PSP this morning.
Title: RE: ITT: PSP Discussion
Post by: Mario on October 07, 2004, 08:44:09 PM
PSP - 7/10/2004 never foghat
Title: RE: ITT: PSP Discussion
Post by: Mario on October 08, 2004, 05:17:27 AM
Reggie puts the PSP in its place
Quote

This morning in Seattle, Nintendo made its most aggressive attack on Sony’s PSP project to date. Following months of staff members whispering to any member of the press that would listen, constantly sewing seeds of doubt regarding the Portable PlayStation, head of sales and marketing for the US, the infamous Reggie Fils-Aime, landed the first on-the-record blow.

“Let me tell you something,” bellowed Fils-Aime with something of a glint in his eye. “Those little women at the Tokyo Game Show with those portable consoles strapped to them… What you didn’t see is that those women were having to go recharge the batteries every two hours!”
Title: RE: ITT: PSP Discussion
Post by: couchmonkey on October 08, 2004, 07:07:37 AM
Ha ha, I wonder if Reggie calls his significant other the little woman?  That guy is hopped-up on Elephant steroids.
Title: RE: ITT: PSP Discussion
Post by: Draygaia on October 14, 2004, 09:30:49 AM
With square-enix releasing 6 games on the DS and only a 1 hour FF movie the problem a possible $350 seems much bigger than it is.
Title: RE: ITT: PSP Discussion
Post by: Mario on October 26, 2004, 10:22:45 PM
Uh oh... PSP price in Japan announced at 19800 yen (around $185 US), cheaper than expected, with 21 launch titles! Launch date = December 12, two weeks after the Japanese DS launch, and a new game based from Final Fantasy 7 is coming to PSP, so much for Square not supporting it. DS = doomed?
Title: RE: ITT: PSP Discussion
Post by: ruby_onix on October 26, 2004, 11:04:17 PM
Wow.

According to the Gaming-Age forums...
Quote

PSP 19800 Yen
http://www.scei.co.jp/corporate/release/pdf/041027a.pdf

PSP + MS Duo + remote headphone = 24800 yen
http://www.scei.co.jp/corporate/release/pdf/041027b.pdf


And according to The MagicBox...
Quote

- RUMOR: Unofficial reports from Japanese retailers stating that Sony will launch the PlayStation Portable in Japan on December 23, for 24,800 yen. The PSP package will include a PSP system (black), Memory Stick Duo 32MB, Battery Pack, AC Adaptor, Headphone with remote control, carrying puch and cleaner.

- RUMOR: There are 12 PSP titles at launch, including:

   * Armored Core: Formula Front (From Software, 5040 yen)
   * Dokodemo Issyo (Sony, 3990 yen)
   * Everybody's Golf Portable (Sony, 5040 yen)
   * Legend of Heroes: Gagharv Trilogy (Bandai, 5040 yen)
   * Lumines (Sony, 3990 yen)
   * Mojipittan (Namco, 4725 yen)
   * Need for Speed Underground Rivals (EA, 5040 yen)
   * Rengoku: The Tower of Purgatory (Hudson, 5040 yen)
   * Ridge Racer Evolution (Namco, 5040 yen)
   * Sangokushi (Koei, 6090 yen)
   * Tiger Woods PGA Tour (EA, 5040 yen)
   * Vampire Chronicles: The Chaos Tower (Capcom, 5040 yen)

- RUMOR: In additon, here is of PSP titles with definite release dates in Japan

   * 01/23/05 - Gran Turismo 4 Mobile (Sony, 5040 yen)
   * 01/23/05 - Popolocrois: Prince Pietro's Adventure (Sony, 3990 yen)
   * 01/23/05 - Final Fantasy VII Advent Children (Square Enix, 5040 yen)
   * 01/24/05 - Puyo Puyo Fever (Sega, 3990 yen)
   * Feb 05 - Metal Gear Acid (Konami, 5040 yen)
   * Feb 05 - Tales of Eternia (Namco, 5040 yen)

Considering that SCEE's president suggested that the PSP hardware was going to cost around $450, I guess this means that Sony wants to play hardball, and they're gonna pull an XBox (maybe even teach Microsoft how it's done) and buy their way into the handheld industry.
Title: RE: ITT: PSP Discussion
Post by: Mario on October 27, 2004, 12:20:29 AM
Yeah... looks like PSP is a serious contender to Nintendo dominance of the handheld market now. This should be very interesting...
Title: RE: ITT: PSP Discussion
Post by: KDR_11k on October 27, 2004, 05:04:26 AM
Of course, it could just be Sony lying so the DS' launch will be impaired because people hold off as the PSP is "just around the corner" (and actually gets released a year later for 300$).
Title: RE: ITT: PSP Discussion
Post by: MaleficentOgre on October 27, 2004, 05:55:45 AM
before you get your panties in a knot, realize that the only games sony has worth playing are $50.  I don't see that flying well.  50 for a dumnbed down GT4 when I can get it for the same price on the PS2.  
Title: RE:ITT: PSP Discussion
Post by: WuTangTurtle on October 27, 2004, 12:42:42 PM
Even worse is that on Gamespot's article of this news says that the official battery life is 6hrs of gameplay on average, and 4-5hrs for moves.

6 HOURS of gameplay, no thank you, if Nintendo DS could only pump out 6 Hours of gameplay I would be pissed off.  The GBASP battery has given up on me when i haven't saved the game and that pisses me off but it hasn't done it much, because ive learned to save more often when batteries are getting low, plus the GBASP battery last a long time.

They improved on the movies but i still don't see ppl buying movies for their PSP instead of DVD.  Heck its more likely that BlueRay Disc and HDVD Disc will have better sales.

I think in Japan PSP will sell very well, due to the fact it is more technology advanced and will have final fantasy advent children, but for the U.S. i seriously doubt it, because of the DS headstart is a lot larger in the U.S.  Which makes me wonder if this is being rushed from Sony or Nintendo.

I know one thing though Nintendo sales of GCN + GBA + GBASP sales are greater than Sony's Ps2 and Ps1 sales.  So if PSP can take away some percentage of the handheld market for a good amount of time then it will hurt Nintendo.  Thats why Nintendo said if the DS doesn't do well it will hurt their company drastically.
Title: RE:ITT: PSP Discussion
Post by: Famicom on October 28, 2004, 06:38:13 PM
In a very hillarious news report over at GameSpot, it looks like Sony and Ninty are getting down and dirty in a verbal slugfest over their new portables. I think it's a little juvenile, but still funny.
Title: RE: ITT: PSP Discussion
Post by: NinGurl69 *huggles on October 28, 2004, 07:25:20 PM
SONY:  "It can play movies and mp3s!"

REGGIE:  "I EAT PSP FOR BREKFAST!"
Title: RE: ITT: PSP Discussion
Post by: KDR_11k on October 28, 2004, 09:31:53 PM
"If you want to play Gran Tourismo you need a PSP, right?"
Last time I checked GT4 was a PS2 title and the PSP game was called GTMobile. Shows how much this guy really knows about his product.
Title: RE:ITT: PSP Discussion
Post by: ruby_onix on October 28, 2004, 10:59:54 PM
Quote

Originally posted by: Famicom
In a very hillarious news report over at GameSpot, it looks like Sony and Ninty are getting down and dirty in a verbal slugfest over their new portables. I think it's a little juvenile, but still funny.

Ken Kutaragi made himself look like a desperate idiot by basically saying that the DS is going to be nothing but a Pokemon-machine, and then saying that the PSP is a way for you to pay $200 for someting you already have (a PS2).

Nintendo's PR guy seemed a little harsh saying that the PSP had no software, but if you look closer, it was the story's editor who specified which trade show the rep was talking about. If he was actually talking about E3, the Nintendo rep was going easy on Sony.
Title: RE: ITT: PSP Discussion
Post by: KDR_11k on October 29, 2004, 05:18:09 AM
I pretty much assumed that was at E3.

Either way, GSI claims they know from a source in Japan that Sony's going to lose 350$ per PSP sold. Sounds like they're mimicking Microsoft there with the difference being that Microsoft is slightly more profitable than Sony. MS is making billions (8/a if I read that report correctly) and although they didn't like it, one billion off their profits isn't a major issue. Sony's financial report looks somewhat different, they had about 800M$ profit last FY, chop two billion off and you can spell "desaster".
Title: RE: ITT: PSP Discussion
Post by: Bill Aurion on October 29, 2004, 06:33:30 AM
What's funny is that Pokemon DS will probably be the final blow to the PSP...
Title: RE: ITT: PSP Discussion
Post by: KDR_11k on October 29, 2004, 06:53:51 AM
"Hey Sony, we got a Pokemon card with your name on it!"
Title: RE: ITT: PSP Discussion
Post by: Ian Sane on October 29, 2004, 07:47:32 AM
"Either way, GSI claims they know from a source in Japan that Sony's going to lose 350$ per PSP sold. Sounds like they're mimicking Microsoft there with the difference being that Microsoft is slightly more profitable than Sony."

$350?!!  That's just insane.  That's like "Sony leaves the console business" insane.  Why would they do something so stupid?  Some of us have suggested the idea that if Sony screws up with the PSP it might create an opening for Nintendo or MS to take the top spot in the console market.  That was hopeful thinking at the time though now it looks very possible.  If this is true that's just irrational panicky behaviour on Sony's part.
Title: RE:ITT: PSP Discussion
Post by: WuTangTurtle on October 29, 2004, 09:08:20 AM
Well IMO u need to lose money to make money.  Just because PSP may be worth $400-$500 it doesnt mean thats how much it cost them to actually make each one.  If they make them in mass im sure the cost of production is cut.  However I think they will still be losing a good chunk of money either way.  

Their main objective is to make money off of the liscenses now and if the system doesn't sell then they won't make money off of new liscenses, and thats where Sony will be left open to a 1-2 punch by Nintendo and Microsoft.  First being DS, second being Xbox2, or Xenon whatever the xbox2 is called.  Lastly and hopefully the Knockout punch with the Revolution.

If you look at xbox when it came out, their system was defiantely around $500 if not more than that to make, and they had a Mexico production facility produce all of their systems, which prolly took some of the blow away from the costly system.  Either way you look at it you lose money to make money, but for Microsoft's case that didn't turn out that well.  Not to mention the downloading of complete games onto xbox hard drives, that my friend is laughable.


As for Ken Kutaragi he is a moron.  In Japan Pokemon still sells like crazy, same in USA also.  I believe that in japan and the USA the fire red and leaf green games both sold over 1 million copies, actually i think each game sold a million but im not too sure, prove me wrong.  

It is the worst comment ive heard, Reggie pwned him.

This is almost like the 2004 presidential election, lol.

"When you cast a vote in a 2 party system, that's when you lose for sure"  - Guttermouth
Title: RE: ITT: PSP Discussion
Post by: KDR_11k on October 29, 2004, 10:09:46 AM
Licenses don't make THAT much, though. They cannot recoup more than maybe 70-80$ per system through licenses.

I was thinking about this (warning: farfetched theories ahead!): Maybe Sony is really leaving the business, Microsoft is gaining momentum and might win the next gen and the japanese market is crumbling, dealing a big blow to Sony. Perhaps it's big enough that their games division wants to do a kamikaze attack: Sell the PSP at ultra low prices, deal a blow to Nintendo, make both companies unprofitable and go down with Nintendo. Killing both yourself and your enemy, devastating the market and leaving a big crater behind.

Another idea: To stop the PSP nintendo could invoke antitrust laws. After all, Sony is abusing their quasi-monopoly position to break into another market using dumping. These laws are there to prevent huge companies from taking losses to underprice their competitors and destroying any competition with smaller profit margins. I think it would really devastate Sony's game division if a court ordered them to price the PSP at 350$ and pay damages to Nintendo...
Title: RE:ITT: PSP Discussion
Post by: WuTangTurtle on October 29, 2004, 10:59:07 AM
WOW, that is hilarously unheard of.

First off Sony's Playstation Division is it's only profitable division.  TV, Camera's, Stereo systems, u name it, all of their divisions have been falling off the profit charts.  Why in the world would they try to destroy thier gaming division.  Unbelievable.  Aru u high KDR_11k?

Secondly Nintendo has 99% of the handheld gaming market.  If anyone gets into monoply trouble its Nintendo.  The DS is cheaper too.  If Nintendo tried to push it they would lose and it would backfire on them forcing the DS to be $300 that way PSP can go to its real price $300-$500.
Title: RE: ITT: PSP Discussion
Post by: Ian Sane on October 29, 2004, 11:18:11 AM
"Another idea: To stop the PSP nintendo could invoke antitrust laws."

I actually thought of that the second I saw the price.  You legally can't take a huge loss just to run a competitor out of business.  Though I doubt Nintendo would do anything about it unless it was really crippling them because Sony is a bigger company and the bigger company usually wins in court.

"Secondly Nintendo has 99% of the handheld gaming market. If anyone gets into monoply trouble its Nintendo."

Nintendo's monopoly isn't a problem because they're doing nothing to keep competitors out.  Anyone can make a competing portable.  The N-Gage isn't failing because Nintendo is using dirty tactics to kill it off, it's failing because it's a crappy product.  So there should be no problems with Nintendo's portable monopoly.
Title: RE:ITT: PSP Discussion
Post by: Guitar Smasher on October 29, 2004, 02:04:27 PM
Quote

Originally posted by: KDR_11k
I pretty much assumed that was at E3.

Either way, GSI claims they know from a source in Japan that Sony's going to lose 350$ per PSP sold. Sounds like they're mimicking Microsoft there with the difference being that Microsoft is slightly more profitable than Sony. MS is making billions (8/a if I read that report correctly) and although they didn't like it, one billion off their profits isn't a major issue. Sony's financial report looks somewhat different, they had about 800M$ profit last FY, chop two billion off and you can spell "desaster".


"As Sony's annual manufacturing rate is about 3 million PSP units, the company, for the next fiscal year, will ship 1 million units each to North America, Europe, and Japan. That, says Kutaragi, will be the break-even point for Sony's PSP to start making a profit."  (from gamespot)

Only 3 million systems in it's first fiscal year?  The PSP's gonna be a pretty rare product.  Well let's do the math: how much does 3 million PSPs cost Sony if only one costs $350?  About $1.05 billion.  That's right, BILLION.

Now here's the funny part:
"But for the PSP, the company hopes to start turning a profit in the short term by releasing the handheld at a low starting price on its launch day." (again from GameSpot)

Here's an idea: hire an accountant.  One billion dollars doesn't come out of just anywhere.
Title: RE: ITT: PSP Discussion
Post by: ruby_onix on October 29, 2004, 03:56:46 PM
Here's the link with Ken Kutaragi taking about the price and profitability of the PSP.

Personally, I think a lot of it looks like BS and doubletalk.

It looks like he's basically saying that the PSP is this cheap because most of it's being made internally at Sony. So he's pretty much just telling us the "raw materials cost" of all the PSP's parts, and that he's going to chalk up the price of constructing all these new factories and labs as a seperate one-time loss (or "investment") which has absolutely nothing at all to do with the PSP. Because that's another department. Which is a stupid word game that couldn't have been done if more of the parts were outsourced.

Also...
Quote

When planning for the PS2, Sony aimed to make a profit on the long term while gradually dropping the console's price. But for the PSP, the company hopes to start turning a profit in the short term by releasing the handheld at a low starting price on its launch day.

... doesn't seem to make any sense.

They're also saying that they'll eventually be able to order the screens in large volume, which will lower Sony's costs even more, but as I pointed out in that other thread, Sony's already doing that.

The battery life comments still seem like overinflated "best case" scenarios, but I think we got the only honest comment from Kutaragi when he said...
Quote

“The Walkman only ran for about two hours when it first came out, too.”
Title: RE: ITT: PSP Discussion
Post by: Stimutacs Addict on October 29, 2004, 07:21:51 PM
Mr. Kataguri and Sony really do believe that this will be the walkman of the game industry; if they plan on having upgrades and better versions every two years, count me out.  
Title: RE: ITT: PSP Discussion
Post by: Ian Sane on October 29, 2004, 07:52:00 PM
"The Walkman only ran for about two hours when it first came out, too."

Yeah and the Walkman was a new idea at the time it was made.  Guess what Sony, Nintendo's game portables have been around since 1989 with decent battery usage.  It's pretty f*cking arrogant for you to make a comparison to the Walkman when the PSP is not a new idea.  It's merely Sony's version of an idea that's been successful for 15 years.  Nintendo had the battery issue in control since DAY ONE.  So get off your f*cking high horse, Ken.  All you guys have done is broken a concept that used to work.
Title: RE:ITT: PSP Discussion
Post by: McBane on October 30, 2004, 05:39:35 AM
Gamespy also says that Sony loses USD 350 (Yen 37.124) on every sold unit.


   
Title: RE: ITT: PSP Discussion
Post by: KDR_11k on October 30, 2004, 06:56:56 AM
GSI = GameSpy Inc.
Title: RE:ITT: PSP Discussion
Post by: Ymeegod on October 30, 2004, 07:30:33 AM
"if Nintendo DS could only pump out 6 Hours of gameplay "

What's funny about all this is the DS is only going get 6 hours of battery life on intense 3d games, hell nintendo stated as much (6-10) hours depending on app.

:0.

And nobody really knows the amount of what sony loses neither, just like with MS for that matter.  
Title: RE: ITT: PSP Discussion
Post by: KDR_11k on October 30, 2004, 09:06:57 AM
6 hours with WiFi! WiFi is an enormous power eater, that's why nintendo developed their own protocoll to use when WiFi isn't absolutely required. The PSP will have maybe 2 hours with WiFi on.
Title: RE:ITT: PSP Discussion
Post by: boggy b on November 02, 2004, 08:50:50 AM
Quote

Originally posted by: KDR_11k
6 hours with WiFi! WiFi is an enormous power eater, that's why nintendo developed their own protocoll to use when WiFi isn't absolutely required. The PSP will have maybe 2 hours with WiFi on.


Again with the assumptions.
Title: RE: ITT: PSP Discussion
Post by: odifiend on November 02, 2004, 10:02:44 AM
An assumption based off of a fact that can be observed with Laptops, which undoubtedly have a bigger and better battery.  So an informed assumption if you will...
Title: RE: ITT: PSP Discussion
Post by: KDR_11k on November 02, 2004, 08:34:53 PM
Nintendo stated that 6 hours was with WiFi on and 10 hours was with WiFi off. PDAs go down to 1.5-2 hours with WiFi on. Nintendo complained about WiFi being such a power eater and said that's why they developed their own protocoll. Just because Sony hasn't said anything about that doesn't mean they've found a way to magically make its power requirements go away.
Title: RE:ITT: PSP Discussion
Post by: Ymeegod on November 03, 2004, 06:07:06 AM
"Nintendo stated that 6 hours was with WiFi on and 10 hours was with WiFi off. "

Nope, nintendo simply stated 6 to 10 hours depending on app.  Sony simply stated 4-6hour depending on app.

Neither stated if that was with WiFi or not.  
Title: RE: ITT: PSP Discussion
Post by: Bill Aurion on November 03, 2004, 06:25:48 AM
Well I don't think the battery life will increase when you have WiFi on, so it's the more likely possibility...
Title: RE: ITT: PSP Discussion
Post by: KDR_11k on November 03, 2004, 09:41:54 AM
I'm pretty sure that Nintendo mentioned WiFi usage as the reason for that difference.

Either way, Kutagari admitted that the PSP's battery life will be shorter than initially claimed, at least for first gen devices. Anyone still questioning where they saved money to bring the price down to 200?
Title: RE: ITT: PSP Discussion
Post by: Mario on November 03, 2004, 02:30:12 PM
http://www.eetimes.com/issue/fp/showArticle.jhtml?articleId=51201601&kc=6256

Interesting article about Sony taking a big gamble with the PSP. Is it possible the PSP could be Sonys official screwup?
Title: RE:ITT: PSP Discussion
Post by: WuTangTurtle on November 03, 2004, 08:13:28 PM
i dunno about you but ditching windows media player stuff seems bad, alot of ppl use their stuff.  I wonder if Sony will bring Sony Connect here for the U.S.  and if ppl will care.
Title: RE: ITT: PSP Discussion
Post by: KDR_11k on November 03, 2004, 11:17:42 PM
I like their decision to scrap WM support. The format must be pushed down and killed for the good of the user. There are many more less restrictive and more capable formats out there, WM sucks and every popular device that doesn't support it is another blow to Microsoft's planned total media control.
Title: RE:ITT: PSP Discussion
Post by: WuTangTurtle on November 04, 2004, 06:52:40 AM
I agree but the large majority of ppl will most likely be dissapointed or annoyed.  Just another problem for the PSP to add on the list.
Title: RE: ITT: PSP Discussion
Post by: vudu on November 04, 2004, 11:47:03 AM
From Mario's article:

Quote

Every PSP unit sale is likely to put SCEI at least 5,000 yen (roughly $47) in the red, resulting in an estimated total loss between $75.4 million and $84.8 million in the second half of the current fiscal year, ending next March
$47 loss per unit is less than what most people around here have been estimating.  I wonder where this number came from, what it's based on, and how reliable it is.

Also, this means that they're estimating between 1.6 and 1.8 million units will be sold by March 2005.
Title: RE: ITT: PSP Discussion
Post by: KDR_11k on November 04, 2004, 09:44:59 PM
"at least". This is an estimate of the minimum loss they're going to take. Although noone knows specifics, we know it has to be higher than 47$. It could be 100$, it coud be 50$, it could be 47$.
Title: RE: ITT: PSP Discussion
Post by: ruby_onix on November 13, 2004, 01:19:42 AM
1up.com

"When it announced the final release date and price point for the handheld earlier this month, Sony said that only 200,000 PSP units would be available on launch day in Japan, with further shipments through the remainder of the month bringing the total for this year to 500,000 units."

"While it's possible that Sony's manufacturing processes haven't gotten up to speed yet, it's also possible that Sony is looking to make its promised 2004 launch for the hardware with as few units as possible, in anticipation of decreasing production costs in the next few months."

"The latter theory is backed up by reports from within Sony that suggest the PSP's production cost currently amounts to as much as $450 at current exchange rates."

Title: RE:ITT: PSP Discussion
Post by: BlackNMild2k1 on November 13, 2004, 12:28:22 PM
A $265.00 Loss!?!?
Title: RE: ITT: PSP Discussion
Post by: MaleficentOgre on November 13, 2004, 06:24:22 PM
could you imagine what the shareholders would do to kutaragi and kobayashi if this thing bombs
Title: RE: ITT: PSP Discussion
Post by: couchmonkey on November 15, 2004, 05:51:34 AM
I think it's actually a bigger problem for Sony if the PSP takes of than if it bombs...if the $265 figure is correct!  That would be more than a billion dollar loss just to sell 4 million units.
But I think we're being a little too confident that Sony has screwed up.  It doesn't make sense to sell the system at a huge loss in limited quantities, they could just push the price up by about a hundred bucks, I'm sure they would still sell those limited quantities and at a smaller loss (or maybe even a profit).  Personally, I think Sony is losing money, but not enough to prevent it from selling a huge number of systems.  If it doesn't want to sell a huge number of systems, then why release them at such a low price?
Then again, maybe Sony really has screwed up.  That would be reassuring to me, if only because I don't want Nintendo to lose it's most profitable market.
Title: RE: ITT: PSP Discussion
Post by: MaleficentOgre on November 15, 2004, 07:26:05 AM
pushing the price up would doom the system, they figure they can push nintendo out of the handheld market and then they won't have to worry about losing money.
Title: RE: ITT: PSP Discussion
Post by: ruby_onix on November 17, 2004, 09:32:01 PM
Here's my latest take on the whole "PSP profitability" thing.

Typically, if Sony is making a hardware product, they put some effort into using Sony-brand parts in the machine. One section of Sony will bill the other section for the parts, so there's really no "savings" in it, but it's more of a "keeping the money inside the family" kind of thing.

With the PSP, Ken Kutaragi has arranged for something like 90% of the parts to be made by Sony, and then ordered all the different sections of Sony to offer their parts to other Sony members at absolutely zero profit.

What difference does this make? Well, if every Sony branch were to bill each other at the full value, Sony would technically lose money on the PSP. This way, Sony in general loses money, but it's not the PSP that's losing the money.

That's detail is Kutaragi was shooting for. If everyone within Sony is playing along with his plan, then the PSP is only 20,000 yen, and at that price it'll "start turning a profit" after one year, and not be "losing money" at all.

If Sony was losing $265 on the PSP, they'd be "dumping", which is deliberately losing money in an attempt to drive their competitors out of the industry. This is especially frowned upon when you're trying to defend a monopoly, or expand from one monopoly to another.

One strategic problem with this plan is that "dumping" relies on your being able to kill off your competitors, so that you can later take over an entire industry unopposed, making back your money with an overpriced device at a later date. Nintendo will at least be competitive in the handheld arena for quite some time, and even if they weren't, there are always other groups trying to break into the industry.

Still, even if Sony only gets a hold of 50% marketshare for this generation, that would be considered a solid "breaking in", and could be worth it to Sony.

Problem is, Sony's gonna lose a lot of money all around, and the shareholders are going to want to know why, but Kutaragi can't explain the "dumping" plan to them, without getting in trouble.

Another problem with this plan is that Sony's divisions historically don't get along with each other. How will one of these divisions feel about making absolutely no money, perhaps even losing money, just so that another division can win all of the glory? Sure, they're under orders from Kutaragi to lose money, so they're not going to get fired over their lack of glory or anything like that, but how will their resume look compared to the guys in that other department after it's all said and done? IMO, the reports coming out about the "actual costs" of the PSP (which fit with all the "pre-announcement" rumors) are coming from these disgruntled divisions.

Plus, if the shareholders are on Kutaragi's back about the money losses, how long is he going to be able to hold off and not fire anyone from one of these "poorly run" unprofitable divisions? Any one of them could become a possible scapegoat at a moment's notice.

Also, of more concern to gamers, is that with the PSP's price being cut so close to the bone, there's almost zero chance of production costs coming down as the unit gets older. Obsolete parts don't suddenly become easier to make. It's mostly that as the hardware gets older, the guys making the parts can't get away with charging as much profit on them. So the PSP at 20,000 yen is basically it's "end of lifespan" price. The only way we're likely to see any price drops on the unit is if the PSP really does revolutionize the handheld industry like Sony keeps saying it will, and Sony earns $50-100 per unit in software royalties (which is high for a home console and unheard of in a handheld).

At least, that's how I think it's working right now. Feel free to point out any inaccuracies in my theory, expand on details you think are important, or bring up ideas that are completely different. I think I'm pretty close to the truth here, but I'm not trying to prove it to anyone (especially since this theory seems to be inherently unprovable). I'm just saying this because I've seen Sony fans get upset at parts of these suggestions.  
Title: RE: ITT: PSP Discussion
Post by: ruby_onix on November 18, 2004, 02:58:20 PM
By the way, CNN is speculating that since Sony has always (twice) launched their consoles in America after the Japanese launches, the manufacturing costs have always come down slightly, so Sony has always given a price cut for the American launch, so CNN thinks that Sony's going to launch the PSP in America at $150, which is the same price as the DS in America.

Personally I think there are a lot of flaws in that logic, but I figured I'd mention it.
Title: RE: ITT: PSP Discussion
Post by: KDR_11k on November 19, 2004, 01:14:26 AM
Yeah, manufacturing costs going down on the PSP will have to compensate for the losses first, I doubt it'll see a price cut in the first few years.
Title: RE: ITT: PSP Discussion
Post by: ruby_onix on November 27, 2004, 03:04:17 PM
Apparently Sony had/has an email/internet survey going in Europe, which reveals some info about the PSP's European pricing.

http://www.jeux-france.com/news6987_psp.html

As far as I can tell, it's saying that PSP games will be 40 Euros ($53).

And that the hardware should be somewhere between 180 and 450 Euros ($239-597)!

Then they ask if people would prefer...

- The PSP by itself for 249 Euros ($330)
- A "128K Multimedia Kit" for 265 Euros ($352)
- A "256K Multimedia Kit" for 285 Euros ($378)

They describe the "Multmedia Kit" as coming with one of two different sizes of Memory Stick, a USB cable, audio/video transfer software, and wireless headphones. The protective case that's part of the Japanese bundle isn't mentioned.

That "128K" and "256K" for the Multimedia Kits is referring to Kilobits. Not even KiloBytes.

That's way too small for a Memory Stick, and Jeux France thinks it's an error. But I'm thinking that maybe SCEE decided to "simplify" things, and refer to the type of mp3 you can typically use with that kind of card? I dunno. Considering that these bundles seem to focus on pushing the PSP as an mp3 player, I think it makes sense.

They also say that the "128K" one can hold 60 songs, and the "256K" can hold 120, if that tells anyone anything.
Title: RE: ITT: PSP Discussion
Post by: Hostile Creation on December 13, 2004, 09:39:53 AM
But isn't the PSP over 200 american dollars in Japan?  Meaning that it'd be 180 or 200 dollars here, if the price dropped?  I dunno, that's a pretty vague conjecture, just wondering.
Title: RE:ITT: PSP Discussion
Post by: couchmonkey on December 14, 2004, 05:44:26 AM
Well, I've seen some reviews, and honestly, I think things are starting to look pretty grim for Nintendo.  The battery life is holding up fairly well to the 4-6 hour figure Sony gave, and the graphics and pricing are both excellent, as always.  I think load times may hurt the system a little (most of them seem to be in the 10-20 second range) and no doubt it will have some durability issues, but I'm sure that for $30-$50 more than the DS, most people will be happy to overlook those problems.

That's not to say DS will fail, either, but Nintendo now has a very serious fight on its hands, methinks.  Here's hoping Nintendo can prove that the DS is truly unique, and can supply is with enough quality games to keep Sony at bay.

(Edit) Hostile Creation: The PSP is $185 US in Japan...if ruby_onix's numbers are correct, it looks like Sony is ripping Europe off.
Title: RE: ITT: PSP Discussion
Post by: KDR_11k on December 14, 2004, 05:54:55 AM
Okay, so I'll stop insulting NoE and blast away at SCEE instead (even though there's a Metal Slug 3 for PS2 here). Are they planning on making Europe compensate them for the seriously underpriced PSP or is that a hint that the US pricing might be much higher than the japanese price as well? Well, that would make sense, in Japan the PSP is in much more direct competition to the DS than elsewhere and Sony sure as hell isn't going to sell millions of PSPs when they're losing ~250$ per unit.
Title: RE: ITT: PSP Discussion
Post by: Savior on December 14, 2004, 06:54:39 AM
The battery life is holding up fairly well to the 4-6 hour figure Sony gave

Gamespot said 90 minutes to 3 hours...

Which is terrible.

Title: RE: ITT: PSP Discussion
Post by: Caustic Saint on December 16, 2004, 09:57:34 PM
I've been consistently getting 4+ hours out of mine with Ridge Racers and playing the demo disc to show the videos to friends. I dunno what Gamespot did to kill it in 90 minutes.
Title: RE:ITT: PSP Discussion
Post by: PaLaDiN on December 16, 2004, 10:00:04 PM
It seems the PSP is a pretty good handheld after all.

I'm still waiting for a must-have game for it though, same as the DS.

In fact I think it's going to be a long time before I buy either one... mostly because I've got so many games to buy.
Title: RE: ITT: PSP Discussion
Post by: Renny on December 19, 2004, 07:49:46 AM
How's battery time with multiplayer?
Title: RE:ITT: PSP Discussion
Post by: SgtShiversBen on December 19, 2004, 09:02:23 AM
As with Savior, I won't buy the PSP until there is something I must have.  By the looks of it though, there is nothing.  Asking my girlfriend what she thought, she said I should get the DS because it has the chat program and she absolutely loved Metroid Prime Hunters.  Another reason is because of Mario 64 (another one of her favs).  So I guess I know which one I'm getting.  I think it's great that she loves the DS, shows that they are appealing to a broader audience with their new features.  Alas, still have to wait till next year
Title: RE: ITT: PSP Discussion
Post by: Caustic Saint on December 19, 2004, 10:15:45 AM
I can't say how long the battery lasts in multiplayer games using the WiFi. Although I've seen lots of other people buying PSPs, I don't personally know anybody who has one.
Title: RE:ITT: PSP Discussion
Post by: BlackNMild2k1 on December 21, 2004, 10:03:54 AM
The is a battery test for PSP on IGN,
expect about:
3 hrs with wifi enabled
5 hours with moderate umd access (no wifi)
10 hrs of mp3 playback (screen off)
and 24hrs of sleep mode

all of these is with screen brightness at full (when screen is on)
and volume @ 100% (when used)
Title: RE: ITT: PSP Discussion
Post by: vudu on December 21, 2004, 10:05:06 AM
What qualifies as "moderate UMD access"?
Title: RE:ITT: PSP Discussion
Post by: BlackNMild2k1 on December 21, 2004, 10:11:26 AM
well as I understand it, it sounds like not contantly spinning, but accessed often, very often
Title: RE: ITT: PSP Discussion
Post by: Hostile Creation on January 16, 2005, 08:35:47 PM
You know, I didn't originally think that the battery life was a big deal at all.  But when I played my DS and even eight to ten hours seemed like not quite enough, I realized how fast time passes when you're playing video games.  It is a problem.  Five hours is crap.
Title: RE:ITT: PSP Discussion
Post by: SgtShiversBen on January 16, 2005, 08:53:38 PM
Same here, while playing Mario 64 my light started blinking and I was all "Oh crap oh crap oh crap!"  I could just imagine how it'd be if you have to find a save point instead of "quit, save, bye bye!!"  
Title: RE: ITT: PSP Discussion
Post by: Renny on January 19, 2005, 06:21:03 AM
Both the DS and PSP have sleep modes that consume very little power. Just put it into sleep and charge. Of course being tethered to the wall isn't exactly portable, but that was never the point of the PSP, it seems. Just make it portable enough for other potential buyers to see it.
Title: RE: ITT: PSP Discussion
Post by: PJ gamer10 on January 20, 2005, 10:24:54 AM
The PSP is starting to pick up big with its hype. The game stores are beginning to push the pre-orders for it. I do believe though that people are misinformed about it. Many come and ask if it plays PS2 games. I just say yes but you will have to pay an additional 40 or 50 dollars for it. The price point though is rumored to be 150. That is very bad for Nintendo. People will look at both systems and for 150 they just get more out of the PSP. Maybe not a new gaming experience but they get power and style.  
Title: RE:ITT: PSP Discussion
Post by: calguy77 on January 23, 2005, 11:03:56 AM
I just went into my EB games to pre order the PSP, they gentleman behind the counter told me GOOD TIMING. Today was the last day they were taking them. I guess EB is almost all out of pre-orders. And he thinks not all will get one when first shipment arrives. I hope I get mine.  
Title: RE: ITT: PSP Discussion
Post by: MaleficentOgre on January 23, 2005, 03:47:49 PM
I'm willing to bet that the majority of people buying a psp will be pissed when they get home and learn they payed $190 for a system that doesn't play DVDs or PS2 games.  I know the people at my gamestop that have preordered it think they're getting a mini ps2 that plays dvds. but hey whatever sells.
Title: RE:ITT: PSP Discussion
Post by: vudu on January 24, 2005, 08:11:58 AM
Quote

I know the people at my gamestop that have preordered it think they're getting a mini ps2 that plays dvds. but hey whatever sells.
And you don't feel the need to inform them of their mistake?  Cold.
Title: RE: ITT: PSP Discussion
Post by: Stimutacs Addict on January 24, 2005, 01:34:35 PM
seriously, tell them that they can get a DS, a game (2 if you count hunters demo), and some protective screen covers and be on your way.

great idea: Nintendo should start bundling a  pen/stylus combo in every first party game. I know Japan is getting cool Kirby pens and such, but that would be a great way for Nintendo to get some better sized (and mcuh more collectable) styli out here in the USA
Title: RE:ITT: PSP Discussion
Post by: vudu on January 24, 2005, 01:46:47 PM
Wow.  I just had to post this.  Gamers report PSP malfunction

Apparently the Square button on 4,800 PSPs have been returned to Sony because they stick.  But don't take my word on it, read the article.  It's filled with such memorable quotes as:
Quote

"This is the design that we came up with. There may be people that complain about its usability, but that's something which users and game software developers will have to adapt to. ... The button's location is [architectured] on purpose.  It's according to specifications. This is something that we've created, and this is our specification. There was a clear purpose to it, and it wasn't a mistake.
And, my personal favorite (oh, if I didn't love my current sig so much):
Quote

I believe we made the most beautiful thing in the world. Nobody would criticize a renowned architect's blueprint that the position of a gate is wrong. It's the same as that.
Title: RE:ITT: PSP Discussion
Post by: BlackNMild2k1 on January 24, 2005, 04:12:02 PM
Quote

I believe we made the most beautiful thing in the world. Nobody would criticize a renowned architect's blueprint that the position of a gate is wrong. It's the same as that.


to Quote PC-Engine from B3D Forums
Quote

Heh it's not the position of the gate...it's the position of deadbolt that doesn't align with the hole on the frame therefore forcing you to push the gate harder in order for the lock to work.
Title: RE: ITT: PSP Discussion
Post by: Ian Sane on January 24, 2005, 08:19:14 PM
"This is the design that we came up with. There may be people that complain about its usability, but that's something which users and game software developers will have to adapt to. ... The button's location is [architectured] on purpose. It's according to specifications. This is something that we've created, and this is our specification. There was a clear purpose to it, and it wasn't a mistake."

What a load of sh!t.  Translation: we made a piece of crap portable but we're Sony DAMMIT and we do whatever we want so you'll just have to f*cking deal with it.  Intentional my ass.  So Sony this means that you're either lying about f*cking up or you're just really incompetant.  So which is it?  Liar or dumbass?  Sony likely just made the mistake early on, hoped no one would notice, and are now acting like it was intentional in what is probably an attempt to justify not replacing defective units.  I mean if a blatant error is intentional it's not a defect, right?

The thing that bugs me is realistically this won't do sh!t.  Nintendo's too wimpy to manipulate this in their marketing and most people just plain aren't going to know.  Sony has made worthless sh!tty hardware for two generations and people have just accepted it so they'll accept this too.

If Nintendo did this Sony would mention it in ads and every gaming journalist in the world would jump all over it.  But because it's Sony it will slide under the radar.
Title: RE: ITT: PSP Discussion
Post by: KDR_11k on January 24, 2005, 09:00:21 PM
Perhaps it will create more attention when the PSP sees its US launch. So far people only know what the media tell them about the PSP in Japan.

EDIT: Matching Sinfest comic.
Title: RE: ITT: PSP Discussion
Post by: ruby_onix on January 25, 2005, 12:14:57 AM
Quote

Intentional my ass. So Sony this means that you're either lying about f*cking up or you're just really incompetant. So which is it? Liar or dumbass?

Have you seen the picture lately? It was clearly intentional. It took effort. They did it on purpose.

Kutaragi explained it right here:
Quote

"I didn't want the PSP's LCD screen to become any smaller than this, nor did I want its machine body to become any larger."


1. Big screen? Check.
2. People said the plastic shell looked "sexy"? Check.
1+2 = Not enough room for buttons? Ehh.. who cares? Screw the buttons.
Launch system!!!


Edit: IGN PSP
Quote

Kutaragi revealed that Sony Computer Entertainment does consider these button problems to be a manufacturing problem and will repair the systems. Of the current shipped PSP units, SCE has so far repaired 0.6% due to button problems.

LOL!

Sony repair = Open unit. Dislodge stuck button. Close unit. Put back on shelf for sale. Wait for it to come back again.

But you know, Sony really is right. I mean, 100% flaw rate = 0.6% bitching. You just know they've gotta be doing something right.
Title: RE: ITT: PSP Discussion
Post by: KDR_11k on January 25, 2005, 09:31:33 AM
Apparently the problem doesn' surface equally with all units. Or some users haven't tried the button much. Makes me wonder about the breakage ratio.
Title: RE: ITT: PSP Discussion
Post by: MaleficentOgre on January 27, 2005, 04:16:10 AM
100% of psps are defective.  a lot of people either haven't turned them in, or haven't mashed hard enough on the square button to cause it io stick.  
Title: RE:ITT: PSP Discussion
Post by: boggy b on February 03, 2005, 12:33:36 PM
Quote

Originally posted by: MaleficentOgre
100% of psps are defective.  a lot of people either haven't turned them in, or haven't mashed hard enough on the square button to cause it io stick.

Actually, no. 100% of PSPs are poorly mechanically designed, but currently only 0.6% are broken because of it. Technically, yes, I suppose you could call it a defect, but it will not manifest itself in every unit with the poor design.

Still, it is a bit of a stupid descision. A 3mm size increase would have sorted the problem out perfectly. It's a bit of a shame really.
Title: RE: ITT: PSP Discussion
Post by: Mario on February 03, 2005, 03:12:54 PM
Quote

but currently only 0.6% are broken because of it.

No. A much higher percentage of broken PSPs exist than that, 0.6% broken PSPs have been sent into Sony and repaired.
Title: RE: ITT: PSP Discussion
Post by: ruby_onix on February 03, 2005, 03:34:09 PM
Stuck buttons are usually fixed by applying back-and-forth twisting force to your controller, but that sucks for the PSP cause then your Spinning Disc of Death winds up killing some random passerby.

It's safer to just bring it to Sony and make them professionally "fix" your stuck button, but that takes too much time and effort, and PSP users have no regard for human life.
Title: RE:ITT: PSP Discussion
Post by: vudu on February 04, 2005, 08:57:37 AM
I read this on another board:
Quote

1 in 7 jap. psp have faulty buttons which sony can't yet fix
1 in 5 jap psp have defective batteries
1 in 18 jap psp have dead pixels or discolored screen problems
30 hrs is the ave. life expectancy of the psp's "analogue stick"
30 days is how long the buttons below the screen are warranteed by sony because of rampant malfunction
and to top it off: Sony states that the left trigger can be expected to not perform as well as the right trigger for some unknown reason that sony can not or will not disclose at the moment.
The guy who posted this didn't back it up whatsoever.  Has anyone else heard these figures, or did this guy just pull a bunch of random stuff out of his ass?  I don't see how this could possibly be accurate, especially the part about the life expectancy of the analogue stick being 30 hours.
Title: RE:ITT: PSP Discussion
Post by: boggy b on February 07, 2005, 07:37:06 AM
Quote

Originally posted by: Mario
Quote

but currently only 0.6% are broken because of it.

No. A much higher percentage of broken PSPs exist than that, 0.6% broken PSPs have been sent into Sony and repaired.


And you do of course have the statistics from a reliable source to back your claim up?
Title: RE: ITT: PSP Discussion
Post by: Bill Aurion on February 07, 2005, 10:54:18 AM
Do you really think everyone who has a "broken" system is going to send it in? =P
Title: RE: ITT: PSP Discussion
Post by: vudu on February 08, 2005, 08:07:10 AM
Has Sony said anything about single cart multiplayer on the PSP?  
Title: RE:ITT: PSP Discussion
Post by: joshnickerson on February 08, 2005, 09:51:41 AM
I have a question... not related to the recent "button crisis"...

I read on a portable site last year (I forget which) that said that the PSP UDM discs would "identify" themselves with only one PSP unit and then could not be played on any other. Basically, you could not trade games with a friend because your games would not work on his PSP and vice versa. Is this true?
Title: RE: ITT: PSP Discussion
Post by: Bill Aurion on February 08, 2005, 10:06:06 AM
I would hope not, because what if you broke your PSP?  You'd then have to buy all-new copies of your games... <_<
Title: RE: ITT: PSP Discussion
Post by: vudu on February 08, 2005, 10:28:20 AM
That's just silly, Bill.  From everything I've read, PSP's are near-indestructible.
Title: RE: ITT: PSP Discussion
Post by: NinGurl69 *huggles on February 08, 2005, 12:11:45 PM
I saw a baseball bat and a rice rocket that would disagree.
Title: RE: ITT: PSP Discussion
Post by: Stimutacs Addict on February 08, 2005, 03:36:54 PM
whoa someone broke a PSP with his penis?

har har
Title: RE:ITT: PSP Discussion
Post by: dmbfan755 on March 01, 2005, 04:38:00 AM
First off, I would like to say that I own a DS and have been a supporter of Nintendo ever since the release of the NES. I have never bought any other console except Sega Genesis. Now, the PSP looks good. I dont understand why people are arguing over which one is "better". I say, "Who Cares?" I dont care which one is better, because its debateable. PSP has good graphics and plays movies, but DS has two screens and a touch screen and can also play gba games. THats sweet. So I say..... get both. Then you can get the games you want for both systems and you dont have to worry about Nintendo's online playability if it never happens, though i hope it does, soon. I personally can't wait for games like lost in blue and viewtiful joe for the DS, and I also really want GTA and the ability to play movies on the PSP.  
Title: RE: ITT: PSP Discussion
Post by: PJ gamer10 on March 15, 2005, 07:54:25 AM
Amen brother!! minus the GTA game for PSP both machines are unique and not very similar. While the DS can seem to really push new boundaries for handheld games with maybe some RTS and more adventure games, the PSP can bring the home entertainment on the go. Where else can you get an MP3 player, Movie player and ps2 quality game player for $250. Now I don't have a PSP nor am I planning to get one until I see they fixed some of the problems, but both systems seem to be different enough to warrant a purchase.  
Title: RE:ITT: PSP Discussion
Post by: SgtShiversBen on March 24, 2005, 07:56:21 AM
After playing the PSP I can say, it's pretty, but not enough to warrant a 250$ purchase.  For me, that's something that I'd have to spend on books or some crap.  NOT on a HANDHELD device.  But that's my verdict.  The games I think are also rip offs. I'm not going to spend 40$ for something I could get for 20$ (Twisted Metal, Metal Gear Solid 3).  So, that's my verdict.
Title: RE: ITT: PSP Discussion
Post by: ruby_onix on March 24, 2005, 05:37:56 PM
Minor anecdotal report on the PSP's launch:

I was just at my local EB, and there was no crowd. I think one person came in, excitedly bought a PSP, and ran off.

A mother was in there and thinking about getting a PSP. After a while of humming and hawing, one of the clerks said "Here, you can just try playing it for a while" and passed a PSP over the counter to her. The other clerk said a very hushed "What the hell do you think you're doing?" to the first guy, who responded "Ehh, who cares? It's just one of the dead pixel units."

After about five minutes, the mom gave the unit back, saying "Oh, I just don't know... How many of these do you have left?" The clerk said "Ummm... ahhh... maybe one... or two?" Then the mom said "So do you think I could sleep on it, and maybe come back tomorrow, and you'd still have one I could buy?" To which the clerk responed with a cheery "Oh sure! No problem. You could totally do that."

I almost broke out laughing. Basically, it seems that at least some retail outlets are under orders to pretend that there is a shortage of PSP hardware, even though they have an abundance, to try and generate excitement.

I went next door to Zellers and saw that they had a neat-and-tidy stack of at least a dozen PSP units behind glass at their videogame counter, with no noticeable interest in them at all (which is semi-typical for Zellers, but not really on a launch day).
Title: RE:ITT: PSP Discussion
Post by: Savior on March 24, 2005, 05:48:29 PM
PSP IGN says you could probably get one, "But they will be sold out by the weekend!" heh maybe its true
Title: RE: ITT: PSP Discussion
Post by: ruby_onix on March 24, 2005, 07:11:22 PM
Yeah. To elaborate, for those who are boycotting IGN, IGN PSP says that from what they've seen, the PSP is selling "hot-and-cold".

Some stores had a frenzy and sold out as quickly as they could humanly take money from people, while other stores apparently can't even give units away.

IGN PSP seems confident that the launch shipment will completely sell out once the people turned away from the "frenzy" stores find the units gathering dust at the "falling asleep" stores.


BTW, I just saw my first PSP television ad about half an hour ago. It's surprising that it took Sony so long. They put out "PlayStation brand" TV ads even when they don't have anything noteworthy to sell.

It has some homeboy (probably a drug dealer) strutting down the street playing a PSP. Then he starts morphing into videogame-esque characters, and breakdancing and stuff. He eventually morphs back into himself and sits down on a bus bench, where a businessman in a suit reading a newspaper appears to be impressed by this cool dude and his PSP.  
Title: RE: ITT: PSP Discussion
Post by: Savior on March 24, 2005, 07:14:58 PM
Theres numerous PSP commercials... ive seen an iPod like PSP commercial with music and some musicians using looking at the PSP screen...

It seems there are targeting the iPod crowd direcctly. Especially with the white earphones (for a black system?)
Title: RE: ITT: PSP Discussion
Post by: ruby_onix on March 25, 2005, 01:51:34 PM
I was curious about day-2, so I just got back from the mall.

In EB, the PSP was selling. There was a lineup. But, I think EB was deliberately trying to create that lineup, because the clerks were working sooo slooowwlyyyy. They were definitely trying to make it look busier in there than it really was.

And the clerks were selling the PSP hard.
Quote

"Oh yeah, it can do anything. It's the most powerful hardware in history. Better than the Xbox. It can do pictures, mp3s, it can play DVD movies and PlayStation games. You can play games wirelessly against anyone on the planet, and they're about to announce that it's a free cellular phone."


^^^ I am seriously not joking.

Also...
Quote

"You know, you're really lucky, because we have almost none of them left. Sony can't even make enough of them to satisfy the unprecedented demand. They're selling-out worldwide. If you don't buy one right now you won't get another chance to get one until after Christmas."


Also, they now had two PSP units sitting loose on the counter. I would've tried to look at one of them, if I wasn't worried that my arm would get bitten off if I had tried to reach through the lineup of grumpy, frustrated soon-to-be PSP owners. They really didn't look as happy as they should be.

Apparently SCEA is saying that they won't accept returns on dead pixel units. Dead pixels are just a "natural part of modern technology", thus, they're a natural part of the PSP. The pattern of dead pixels in your display is like your PSP's unique fingerprint.

Anyways, apparently this means that EB is stuck with the dead pixel units, because they have this thing where if you pay $5 when you buy a system, you can return it for whatever reason (whether Sony considers a dead pixel to be a "feature" or not). EB will probably try and push these units back out again as "preowned" units, to you better watch out if you're even thinking about getting a preowned PSP from EB.

Zellers next door had sold about half of their units (6 down, 6 to go).

My conclusion is that Sony shipped 1 million PSP units, and that's the extent of Sony's concern here. That's what they will be bragging about. I mean, hey, the retail outlets have already paid Sony for them, so technically they've all been sold. Many retailers are now stuck with expensive PSP units that aren't selling, but they will sell them, one way or another.
Title: RE: ITT: PSP Discussion
Post by: Don'tHate742 on March 25, 2005, 03:10:41 PM
That's a really funny post Ruby_Onix.

And to think, Americans gobble up technology more than the Japanese, yet sales are worse out the gate. There's an ironic taste to all of this.
Title: RE:ITT: PSP Discussion
Post by: allcaps on March 26, 2005, 06:32:56 AM
Quote

Originally posted by: ruby_onix
Yeah. To elaborate, for those who are boy.

It has some homeboy (probably a drug dealer) strutting down the street playing a PSP. .




I really hope you aren't inferring that the guy was a drug dealer because he was black, which I'm guessing is what you mean by a "homeboy".
Title: RE: ITT: PSP Discussion
Post by: Renny on March 26, 2005, 07:41:28 AM
The businessman was probably looking to score some rock.
Title: RE: ITT: PSP Discussion
Post by: ruby_onix on March 26, 2005, 04:48:37 PM
He was black, wearing "gangsta" style clothing, and flaunting his wealth.

I guess he might have been a pimp or something...
Title: RE: ITT: PSP Discussion
Post by: PJ gamer10 on March 27, 2005, 07:32:54 AM
At my store we have had a few PSP systems brought back because of dead pixel issues. We did sell out of our stock though so we were not able to exchange it for them. we received 100 systems for our launch day. One thing i did notice was that people were buying the system and no games. I thought it was odd but some people were saying they did not want the same games as their home system. Many people just bought it because it had the Playstation name. Should be interesting to see how many systems we do get back because of faulty issues.  
Title: RE:ITT: PSP Discussion
Post by: allcaps on March 28, 2005, 07:04:06 PM
Quote

Originally posted by: ruby_onix
He was black, wearing "gangsta" style clothing, and flaunting his wealth.

I guess he might have been a pimp or something...


I just saw the commercial. I'm guessing you've never seen a black person outside of TV in your life if you would call what he was wearing "gangsta style clothing".

Title: RE: ITT: PSP Discussion
Post by: Hostile Creation on March 29, 2005, 10:30:28 AM
The only black guy who's my really good friend wears blue clothes and believes he's the king of the ocean, so I have an even more severe misperception of blacks than most people do.
Title: RE: ITT: PSP Discussion
Post by: ruby_onix on March 29, 2005, 11:16:49 AM
I should probably point out that I was mostly joking about the "drug dealer" and "pimp" stuff.

(Although I did honestly get the impression that was the image Sony was trying to shoot for, although I've only seen that commercial once.)
Title: RE:ITT: PSP Discussion
Post by: Sir_Stabbalot on March 29, 2005, 01:40:10 PM
Quote

Originally posted by: PJ gamer10
At my store we have had a few PSP systems brought back because of dead pixel issues. We did sell out of our stock though so we were not able to exchange it for them. we received 100 systems for our launch day. One thing i did notice was that people were buying the system and no games. I thought it was odd but some people were saying they did not want the same games as their home system. Many people just bought it because it had the Playstation name. Should be interesting to see how many systems we do get back because of faulty issues.


Sounds like a lot of those people thought it plays PS2 games.
Title: RE:ITT: PSP Discussion
Post by: Talon on March 29, 2005, 05:13:48 PM
Lets not forget that the DS was released just before the PSP so alot of people either
a) Dont have the money to buy a PSP cause they already bought a DS or
b) People are happy with their DS and really arent interested in the PSP at this point in time or
c) People are watching how both the DS and PSP stack up against one another before they buy one

It will be interesting to see what happens later in the year towards christmas, then we will know which is the must have and which the must not.
Title: RE: ITT: PSP Discussion
Post by: Stimutacs Addict on March 29, 2005, 05:29:21 PM
the advanced media network just announced that there are 2 Command and Conquer games en route to the PSP, which got me thinking. . .

who the F*%|< would make an RTS on the PSP, when they could make it 2wice as cool on the DS?
Title: RE: ITT: PSP Discussion
Post by: KDR_11k on March 29, 2005, 10:11:59 PM
Probably spinoffs like Renegade...
Title: RE:ITT: PSP Discussion
Post by: Talon on March 30, 2005, 02:12:52 AM
Quote

Originally posted by: Stimutacs Addict
the advanced media network just announced that there are 2 Command and Conquer games en route to the PSP, which got me thinking. . .

who the F*%|< would make an RTS on the PSP, when they could make it 2wice as cool on the DS?


Developers who think it would have more success on the PSP. Not to mention SONY would probably be paying EA big money to get these titles on the PSP. I agree with you that they would be better suited to the DS but money talks and bullshit (Command & Conquer on PSP) walks.

Maybe some sort of mouse peripheral is in the works for the PSP?
Title: RE: ITT: PSP Discussion
Post by: darknight06 on March 30, 2005, 03:11:20 AM
Command and Conquer hasn't been good since Westwood was bought out.  This is obviously being made for two reasons, milk the franchise, and it won't have competition like it would on the DS.
Title: RE:ITT: PSP Discussion
Post by: dmbfan755 on April 05, 2005, 09:50:32 AM
Does anyone know if 24: The Game, when released later this year, will be released on the PSP, or is it totally exclusive to PS2, not just Sony?
Title: RE: ITT: PSP Discussion
Post by: ruby_onix on April 07, 2005, 12:27:07 PM
So it looks like the sales figure Sony's going to be bragging about is 500,000.

Quote

Pulling in more than $150 million at retailers across the country, the new handheld system outpaced every product sold in the time period, in addition to selling over 500,000 Value Packs in the first two days alone.

Quote

"The launch of PSP was everything we hoped for, with extraordinary consumer demand driving sales of hardware units alone upwards of $150 million in first week sales, far and away above those generated by any other product in the space," said Kaz Hirai, president and chief executive officer, Sony Computer Entertainment America. "In only two weeks, PSP is having an immediate impact across the entire industry as consumers are clearly voting it the product of the year in 2005."


I also liked this part...
Quote

"GameStop, Inc. has seen an extraordinary cross section of consumers come through our doors including hard core gamers, business men and women of all ages looking to get a PSP," said Dan DeMatteo, vice-chairman and chief operational officer, GameStop Inc. "The overall entertainment value of PSP is giving it a mass appeal beyond any other product we have ever carried."
Title: RE: ITT: PSP Discussion
Post by: ruby_onix on April 08, 2005, 03:01:19 AM
Here's a funny thing.

Everyone is doing the math and seeing that $150 million, divided by the $250 PSP, would be 600,000 units. And Sony said "over 500,000" units sold.

GameSpot even says "600,000" in the headline of their story on it.

But if you think about it, Sony didn't say that $150 million was just for hardware. Just that the PSP's launch "generated it".

Think about this for a second...

$250 PSP hardware times 500,000 units would be $125 million.

$50 PSP games times 500,000 units would be... $25 million.

Could the PSP actually be having an abysmal 1-1 tie ratio? Some people are buying the hardware with zero games. How many people bought a second game for their system when they were already shelling out $300?

Could be very interesting. I can hardly wait for the NPD numbers to come out.  


Edit: Sony's official press release says that it "generated more than $150 million", but a little lower it also says that it did $150 million on "hardware units alone", so there goes my theory.
Title: RE: ITT: PSP Discussion
Post by: ruby_onix on April 10, 2005, 02:12:54 PM
Here's a few more updated anecdotes from me.

I visited my local EB and Zellers on friday. Zellers was sold out of the last of their PSPs hardware, and they had shuffled some other product over to fill it's empty space (they still had a small section for PSP games). In EB, there was a bit of a scene, as someone who bought a launch day PSP was trying to return/exchange it because of dead pixels. The store was telling him "no", and he wasn't going to take "no" for an answer.

The manager had come out and was trying to get him to lower his voice. She was telling him "Look, I can take you into the back room and show you the email we got from Sony, telling us not to take back any PSPs that have dead pixels, because they aren't gonna give us a dime for them. Maybe if you had more than 14 dead pixels then we could help you, but as-is, Sony doesn't think that four of five dead pixels is going to interfere with your games."

The guy started saying "If I had gotten it from Future Shop instead of you, I bet I would've been able to return it." The manager took out her wallet and said "If I take that unit from you, I might as well just hand you $300 (Canadian) from my own wallet, because that unit's not gonna do me any good. I'm not going to do that. Maybe someone at Future Shop might do that for you, but I won't."

Then they guy started saying that he wanted the guy who was working the register on launch day to be fired, because he wasn't warning people, but the manager said that was ridiculous, and absolutely out of the question.

The guy eventually left, saying that he was never going to shop at EB again.


Someone came in a bit later, thinking about buying a PSP. They told him that it comes with Spiderman 2, which tells me that they're still working on selling their launch units. One clerk told the guy that it plays mp3s and DVD movies. They guy said "Whoa! It plays DVDs too?!?" The other clerk popped in with "Well, not exactly. Not ordinary DVDs. They have to be mini discs, otherwidse they wouldn't fit." The guy said "What? Minidisc? I have those. For my car stereo. They're great. I didn't think anyone else even knew what they were." To which the clerk had to respond "No, not 'Minidisc' mini disc. It's 'UMD'. Made by Sony." To which they guy said "Yeah, all my Minidiscs are made by Sony." The clerk said "No no, it's not the same thing. Sony decided to make an all-new format. Again. It doesn't work with anything else. Just the PSP." To which the guy said "Oh. Well that sucks."


Yesterday I went out to New Westminster (a suburb) and checked out another EB, a WalMart, and a Best Buy.

In EB, while looking over their games, I noticed that they had two PSP units in the glass cabinet behind the cashiers. Someone came up and asked if they had any PSP units left, and they said "Wow, your timing is great. I think we have ONE unit left. It's in the back of the store. I'll go get it." He went off, and he came back, saying "Yep, this is the last one that we have in stock." Meanwhile I'm just staring at the two behind the counter...

Over in WalMart they has around 20 PSP units in their videogame cabinet. Over in Best Buy, they must have had at least 50 units in a white-metal locking cage.
Title: RE: ITT: PSP Discussion
Post by: KDR_11k on May 06, 2005, 05:09:58 AM
UMD hacked. In other news the DS now runs Linux.
Title: RE: ITT: PSP Discussion
Post by: kirby_killer_dedede on May 06, 2005, 02:44:28 PM
Hrrm.  My dad just called from a conference across the country and apparently he won a PSP in a raffle.

I'm not sure what to make of this...
Title: RE: ITT: PSP Discussion
Post by: NinGurl69 *huggles on May 06, 2005, 03:37:58 PM
Do your best to keep guns/psps off the streets.
Title: RE: ITT: PSP Discussion
Post by: Renny on May 06, 2005, 06:15:05 PM
Chris Rock says trade in your PSP for a blade.
Title: RE: ITT: PSP Discussion
Post by: stevey on May 09, 2005, 11:33:07 AM
I not getting a psp because of $$$ and the umd cost $50 DOLLAR! $50 DOLLAR come on just for a d*mn movie that cost 20 on dvd that can be played on any tv $60 DOLLAR for ps1 port that are in wide screen.

I can buy a ps1 with a batty pack and bigger lcd widescreen for a $150 and game for 10. WHY it selling, why it selling?Didn't they say psp was backward captal with ps1 and play dvd a few year ago and now what? Rebuy it so sony get more your money.

PSP is more powerfull so was the n-gage but gba with 2d bet the 3d n-gage why don' the rule aply to sony? The ps3 is the same thing the neo geo did and they die and both were go for matur game.

am I not seeing something or did the world go crazy?
Title: RE:ITT: PSP Discussion
Post by: IceCold on May 15, 2005, 12:13:19 AM
It's the brand name. The name "Playstation" has become extremely popular, especially to casual gamers. Sony are relying too much on the fact that people will buy it just because it's a PS. They also advertised the PSP a LOT, and that always has an effect.

However, the sales will slow down, and when titles such as Mario Kart, Animal Crossing, Kirby etc come to North America, the DS should start to pull away. Another Code is a wildcard - I'm not sure if it will do too well, but it has potential
Title: RE:ITT: PSP Discussion
Post by: darknight06 on May 15, 2005, 06:31:03 AM
Don't knock the Neo-Geo, the price point messed that system up more than anything else cuz it did have some great games.  Samurai Shodown in particular.
Title: RE:ITT: PSP Discussion
Post by: BlackNMild2k1 on May 15, 2005, 11:30:22 AM
I just wanted to link this in here (as it seems to be the Official PSP topic)

not only can PSP run linux, but now it emulates not only the GBA, but can also emulate the SNES

PGC Forums
Title: RE: ITT: PSP Discussion
Post by: jasonditz on May 17, 2005, 07:48:05 PM
If all it took to win the handheld market was emulators, wouldn't we all be using Gameparks already?  
Title: RE: ITT: PSP Discussion
Post by: Robotor on June 02, 2005, 11:38:59 AM
I finally got to test a PSP (albiet not at my best as I have a broken arm), and its a pretty sleek system.  The screen realy is all its cracked up to be, very clear, very large, and very fragile.  The analoge nub worked pretty well, but is no stick as it doens't have as large as radius.  The sound was alright, but not great.  It was pretty comfortable, but the nub is in the non dominant position(much like the PS2 controller).  

All in all its an alright little system, except for one thing.  The loading times are unacceptable, I shoulndn't have to wait 30-40 seconds to play another stage in mercury.  One of my friends stated that the loading is because it "has to push superior graphics", which is BS.  That and the battery life, even the owner of the PSP complained of this, and after I gave it back to him the battery died.  Also the main menu is confusing, and not very user friendly.

The whole event made me happier with my DS purchase.  Even though Mercury was really fun.
Title: RE:ITT: PSP Discussion
Post by: Darkheart on June 05, 2005, 06:19:55 PM
 PSP Game Sales Drop  


Though Sony's PSP is still a relatively new system in Japan, having been released merely six months ago, the sales numbers for the handheld's games have dropped to a dismal level. For the week of May 23, only four PSP games remained in Dengenki's top 50 sales rankings and none made it into the top 20. The disappointing figures are attributed to the market's lack of major spring releases.

During that same week in May, many hotly anticipated PSP games were released, such as Intelligent License, but the game only made it to 38th place on the Dengenki rankings. Derby Time, Dorasulot: Shuyaku wa Zenigata, and Minna no Golf Portable were the only other games to break into Dengenki's top 50.

On the other side of the handheld war, six Nintendo DS titles broke into Dengenki's top 20 list, although half of them were different editions of the same game--Nintendogs. Two DS games, SD Gundam G-Generation DS and (take a deep breath) Touhoku Daigaku Mirai Kagakugijutsu Kyoudoukenkyuu Center: Kahashima Ryuuta Kyouju no Nou o Kitaeru Otona DS Training, a brainteaser game, actually made it as far as Dengenki's top ten list. For you curious non-Japanese speakers, the title of the latter game roughly translates to Touhoku University's Future Technology Collaborative Research Centre's Professor Ryuuta Kawashima presents: DS Brain Training for Adults. After fitting that onto the box of the game, one can't imagine any sort of art or logo making it on as well.

Currently, Nintendo DS sales are beating out those of the PSP and PS2 in Japan. The PSP has 39 titles out on the Japanese market, 8 of which are first-party games. The Nintendo DS follows closely behind with 37 available titles, 14 of which were developed by Nintendo.


Article from RPGamer.com

It speaks for it self
Title: RE: ITT: PSP Discussion
Post by: ruby_onix on June 06, 2005, 04:48:00 PM
Sony tries to choke off UK PSP imports
Quote

Sony has taken legal action against resellers flogging PlayStation Portable (PSP) devices ahead of the official 1 September European launch. The consumer electronics giant has sent "cease and desist" letters to grey market traders that are selling PSPs to UK punters after importing them from either Japan or the US, where the eagerly sought gadget is already on sale.


Quote

The Japanese manufacturer is claiming infringement of Trade Mark. But one reseller at the receiving end of the legal nastygrams, ElectricBirdLand, claims that key technologies, trademarks and software utilised in Sony’s new portable gaming platform have not even been registered by Sony in the UK. For example, the PSP trademark has apparently been registered by a small Bristol-based IT and design firm, called Owtanet.

Title: RE:ITT: PSP Discussion
Post by: BlackNMild2k1 on June 06, 2005, 07:35:05 PM
Quote

Originally posted by: ruby_onix
Sony tries to choke off UK PSP imports
Quote

The Japanese manufacturer is claiming infringement of Trade Mark. But one reseller at the receiving end of the legal nastygrams, ElectricBirdLand, claims that key technologies, trademarks and software utilised in Sony’s new portable gaming platform have not even been registered by Sony in the UK. For example, the PSP trademark has apparently been registered by a small Bristol-based IT and design firm, called Owtanet.


But what does this mean for Sony's PSP in the UK?  They don't own their own trademarks? that can only spell one thing.......


....DOOM for the PSP

....D.E.L.A.Y.E.D - Did I worry you with the DOOM link?    
Title: RE: ITT: PSP Discussion
Post by: jasonditz on June 06, 2005, 07:52:55 PM
Not sure how they handle things in the UK, but if this were in north america, the small bristol-based IT firm would be forced into bankrupcy by the ensuing lawsuit for daring to use a three letter acronym that a bigger company wanted.

Like poor Mike Rowe, and his ill-fated software company.  
Title: RE:ITT: PSP Discussion
Post by: BlackNMild2k1 on June 06, 2005, 08:02:34 PM
Quote

Originally posted by: jasonditz
Not sure how they handle things in the UK, but if this were in north america, the small bristol-based IT firm would be forced into bankrupcy by the ensuing lawsuit for daring to use a three letter acronym that a bigger company wanted.

Like poor Mike Rowe, and his ill-fated software company.

I was gonna ask if this was that company that had trademarked the name Xbox, but then I decided to just Google it.

www.mikerowesoft.com  
Title: RE: ITT: PSP Discussion
Post by: couchmonkey on June 10, 2005, 06:01:29 AM
September 1st, WOWSERS!  That's a huge delay.  A delay of N64 proportions!  I don't think PSP will be too well off in Europe at that rate.
Title: RE: ITT: PSP Discussion
Post by: KDR_11k on June 11, 2005, 12:27:09 AM
Who knows? There's no direct competition looming so they can actually take their time if they don't mind lagging behind the DS. Of course that means less software support but since the PSP is "the most beautiful thing in the world" it can manage without, right?

So far it looks like people are more interested in the homebrew applications than the games so maybe Sony will rip us off again by a huge margin to make up for their losses elsewhere.
Title: RE:ITT: PSP Discussion
Post by: BlackNMild2k1 on June 22, 2005, 08:42:11 PM
Quote

Originally posted by: couchmonkey
September 1st, WOWSERS!  That's a huge delay.  A delay of N64 proportions!  I don't think PSP will be too well off in Europe at that rate.

Thats probably also why they lowered their expectations for sales too

Less PSP's
Quote

Nikkei BP says companies providing Sony with components for the portable had been told early in 2005 to expect orders for about 18 million units. However, during a meeting with its suppliers, Sony revealed its plan to manufacture 12 million machines. Nintendo is expected to manufacture over 20 million DS units over the next year.

Is PSP doesn't get a killer game soon I'm sure those expectations could drop much, much lower than they are now.
Title: RE:ITT: PSP Discussion
Post by: darknight06 on June 23, 2005, 11:14:07 AM
"If PSP doesn't get a killer game soon I'm sure those expectations could drop much, much lower than they are now."

Well, apparently Coded Arms won't be helping their situation at all.  (EGM scores  Coded Arms - 4.0,6.0,3.5)  Wasn't this supposed to be one of the big releases?  
Title: RE: ITT: PSP Discussion
Post by: stevey on June 23, 2005, 12:12:25 PM
wow it look like psp is die the way the ngage, neogeo pocket, game gear, and links (or what ever it was called) did! wow REGGIE was right after all (note to self forget what ever Ian say)
Title: RE: ITT: PSP Discussion
Post by: KDR_11k on June 23, 2005, 11:01:26 PM
It already outsold the NGage, I suppose it will compete with the Game Gear.
Title: RE:ITT: PSP Discussion
Post by: Flames_of_chaos on June 26, 2005, 09:09:14 AM
So Coded Arms is a flop like I expected PSM gave it a 2 out of 5 (PSP is not a good FPS handheld) so the other "big release" on the PSP is Infected I wonder how that will fare.
Title: RE: ITT: PSP Discussion
Post by: Stimutacs Addict on June 27, 2005, 04:50:30 AM
dont forget GTA... you know they'll throw in some wireless support; Americans will love it
Title: RE: ITT: PSP Discussion
Post by: KDR_11k on June 27, 2005, 09:08:44 AM
GTA has problems runnig on the PS2 and is no fun in multiplayer, the PSP version might surprise us all or it might disappoint the casuals. It's not developed by the main GTA team.
Title: RE: ITT: PSP Discussion
Post by: stevey on June 27, 2005, 05:04:23 PM
GTA is not coming out on the psp! you been lie to.  
Title: RE: ITT: PSP Discussion
Post by: nickmitch on June 27, 2005, 06:06:34 PM
Will it be the over the head version or the over the shoulder version?  
Title: RE: ITT: PSP Discussion
Post by: Stimutacs Addict on June 27, 2005, 06:45:29 PM
i have absolutely no clue; ideally it wouldn't come out at all. I loathe the PSP, but threw the GTA thing out there to spark conversation.

having said that, I think they're shooting for 3d gameplay (like 3, VC, SA)... but we all know worlds like that = constant loading= constantly streaming data from disk = lower battery life.
Title: RE:ITT: PSP Discussion
Post by: darknight06 on June 27, 2005, 09:19:18 PM
"having said that, I think they're shooting for 3d gameplay (like 3, VC, SA)... but we all know worlds like that = constant loading= constantly streaming data from disk = lower battery life. "

Which won't happen if the battery mandate is still in effect.  Sure the game may be 3D, but it might not in the way we know it is.
Title: RE: ITT: PSP Discussion
Post by: KDR_11k on June 28, 2005, 09:36:32 AM
Perhaps it's going to be mission based instead of freeform with missions thrown in? I wonder if that would sell.
Title: RE: ITT: PSP Discussion
Post by: stevey on June 28, 2005, 03:21:50 PM
"Perhaps it's going to be mission based instead of freeform with missions thrown in? I wonder if that would sell. "

No the whole point of GTA is freeform gameplay. That and killing hoker for there money.
Title: RE: ITT: PSP Discussion
Post by: vudu on June 29, 2005, 09:14:45 AM
Quote

That and killing hoker for there money.
Technically, it's your money.  You just need to convince them to give it back to you.
Title: RE: ITT: PSP Discussion
Post by: nickmitch on June 29, 2005, 10:43:41 AM
Yeah, by convincing them with your gun.
Title: RE: ITT: PSP Discussion
Post by: Zach on June 29, 2005, 05:50:18 PM
It seems kinda funny to me that the PSP has all of these great Capabilities, but they cant use them to their full potential because of the battery life. lol
Title: RE:ITT: PSP Discussion
Post by: IceCold on June 29, 2005, 08:54:43 PM
It really isn't a good portable machine
Title: RE: ITT: PSP Discussion
Post by: Zach on June 30, 2005, 09:57:58 AM
and yet, they have that commercial with people playing the PSP everywhere they go (The best  part is the person playing on a roller coaster, I would like to see someone try that one). They dont show the people searching for an electrical outlet all the time.
Title: RE: ITT: PSP Discussion
Post by: Deguello on July 02, 2005, 02:23:43 AM
Could someone get Sony on the phone and tell them that the PSP is a video game device?

According to EB, there are 14 titles coing out in July for the PSP, but only one is a game, that being Coded Arms.  The rest are UMD movies.  I'm not really su-  Wait a sec!  Only one game is out for the PSP in July?!  Holy crap!  What a problem!

Here's hoping IGN gets to the bottom of this maddening oversight with some hard-hitting investigative journalism and some tough questions to a Sony executive.
Title: RE:ITT: PSP Discussion
Post by: Cap on July 04, 2005, 10:28:32 AM
Quote

Originally posted by: Deguello
Could someone get Sony on the phone and tell them that the PSP is a video game device?

According to EB, there are 14 titles coing out in July for the PSP, but only one is a game, that being Coded Arms.  The rest are UMD movies.  I'm not really su-  Wait a sec!  Only one game is out for the PSP in July?!  Holy crap!  What a problem!

Here's hoping IGN gets to the bottom of this maddening oversight with some hard-hitting investigative journalism and some tough questions to a Sony executive.



If i could sell movies for more than the cost of a dvd(at least where i live, around $25-30 cdn), i'd be sure to release as many as i could too. That being said, I really dont understand why anyone would buy movies for the thing.....
Title: RE: ITT: PSP Discussion
Post by: nickmitch on July 04, 2005, 01:25:33 PM
Well the bought the thing in the first place so now it's like, "Well I got, now I got to live with it!"
Title: RE: ITT: PSP Discussion
Post by: Deguello on July 12, 2005, 05:55:54 AM
EB games just updated their release schedule for the PSP to include 4 more movies (Sin City, Coyote Ugly, The Rock, and Shaolin Soccer) and no new games for August.

What  market does Sony think they are in?
Title: RE:ITT: PSP Discussion
Post by: IceCold on July 12, 2005, 08:41:15 AM
The video game market.
Title: RE: ITT: PSP Discussion
Post by: KnowsNothing on July 12, 2005, 09:02:25 AM
Sony's in the video/game market =O
Title: RE: ITT: PSP Discussion
Post by: nickmitch on July 12, 2005, 10:45:01 AM
The-multifuntioning-item-that-does-things-that-know-one-who-would-buy-it-for-it's-"primary"-function market.
Now if you'll excuse me, I have to program my Sony Clock/Radio to tape my soap operas and upload the pics that I took on it to my Sony Lamp, which I have to program to wake me up in the morning and set my station pre-sets on it.  

P.S.: Run-on sentences are fun!  
Title: RE:ITT: PSP Discussion
Post by: BlackNMild2k1 on July 21, 2005, 09:08:23 AM
Sony had a press conference last nite, here is some new stuff for PSP

New SCEJ PSP games:

Fukufuku Island

ByteHell2000

Rogue Galaxy (PS2) site pre-open:

fukufuku island......  I think there will be a name change b4 a US release

a pertty new white PSP is to be released w/ a firmware update of 2.0, Personal TV, Movie playback support from MS @ UMD quality, 'jump to' feature for UMD movies, customizable backgrounds, and a new official browser is being released.

White PSP 2.0

More Pics

oh and I hear that Brain training is getting a PSP release (not developed by Nintendo?)
Title: RE: ITT: PSP Discussion
Post by: Deguello on July 21, 2005, 09:58:55 AM
I believe Brain Training was designed by and published by Nintendo.    So there is zero chance of it being on the PSP.  

Another game the PSP SHOULD have but doesn't.  When is Sony going to announce a game that I specifically want?  That is the only way that they can receive success through my eyes. </ian>
Title: RE: ITT: PSP Discussion
Post by: stevey on July 22, 2005, 06:35:37 AM
"customizable backgrounds, and a new official browser is being released."

I hope nintendo steal I mean copy those idea for the gbc no that dosen't work... gb³ they copy the face plate.  
Title: RE: ITT: PSP Discussion
Post by: Deguello on July 22, 2005, 11:51:51 PM
I might be mistaken.  There does seem to be some kind of "Brain Training" game in the works for the PSP... hmmm...

EDIT:  OH, apparently the game is called "Work your Brain", it's made by Sony, and is a cheap knockoff of the successful DS game  But it probably won't do as well as DS Brain training.
Title: RE: ITT: PSP Discussion
Post by: KnowsNothing on July 23, 2005, 04:55:24 AM
You know which system is the winner when the cheap knockoffs start coming out.  Besides, without the touch screen or the mic, the PSP version will suck.
Title: RE: ITT: PSP Discussion
Post by: KDR_11k on July 23, 2005, 05:09:42 AM
I think drawing Kanji and such was part of the DS braintrain, the PSP won't be able to do that. Will probably end up as You Don't Know Jack wihout the humour.
Title: RE:ITT: PSP Discussion
Post by: Stimutacs Addict on July 25, 2005, 07:11:51 PM
nonetheless; PSP's firmware will soon allow users to browse the web at any hotspot, meaning that I could be on these boards a hell of a lot more (if i owned a PSP)..

when the hell is nintendo going to do something about this? I know they could release a similar update that could allow us to use our DS's as PDA/web browsers... let's face it; the DS is better suited for web browsing and PDA applications.  If nintendo doesnt upgrade DS firmware / pipe Pictochat through the WiFi connection then PSP is going to make some major bounds in the USA. kids will eat this shtuff up
Title: RE: ITT: PSP Discussion
Post by: nickmitch on July 25, 2005, 07:15:24 PM
When Nintendo releases DS WiFi then we'll get something of that sort.
Title: RE: ITT: PSP Discussion
Post by: ShyGuy on July 25, 2005, 08:51:42 PM
I wish Nintendo would come out with a really good spreadsheet program. Save me some time, let me tell you..

BTW, have you guys seen the previews of the Animal Crossing rip-off coming out for the PSP? I expect PSP Virtual Pets sometime in 2006.

FukuFuku no Shima
Title: RE:ITT: PSP Discussion
Post by: BlackNMild2k1 on July 26, 2005, 01:25:13 AM
I posted a link to the Fukufuku official site a few post above. But I gave no info as to what it was causre I had to go to work at that point in time.

So uhh thanks for a link with more info(in english at that )
Title: RE: ITT: PSP Discussion
Post by: kirby_killer_dedede on July 26, 2005, 06:10:02 AM
The only thing I own for my PSP is Spider-Man 2.  And a bunch of mp3s.  

Still waiting for something to wow me...

Edit: And I'm not sure I understand this firmware business.  So people who already own DS's are stuck with WLAN PictoChat unless they buy a new one (assuming a firmware update makes online PictoChat possible)?  They should release patches through Wifi...
Title: RE:ITT: PSP Discussion
Post by: BlackNMild2k1 on July 26, 2005, 08:33:13 AM
and by Wifi you mean P2P and not Internet right?
Title: RE: ITT: PSP Discussion
Post by: vudu on July 26, 2005, 08:55:59 AM
KKD - Why do you own a PSP if you don't own any games?
Title: RE: ITT: PSP Discussion
Post by: stevey on July 26, 2005, 11:08:04 AM
what psp play game! I thout it just played movie and music. and for the people with ass burger that was sarcam.
Title: RE:ITT: PSP Discussion
Post by: kirby_killer_dedede on July 26, 2005, 04:24:36 PM
I got it for free.

I have no doubt that PSP's going to have some great games, but I'm still waiting...

Of course I'm still a DS fanboy.

Judging by stevey's love for family guy and nack for misspelling I'm thinking that his name is Stewie, and he misspelt it.

EDIT: I WAS RIGHT.

STEVEY SEZ: "Family guy the movie is most likly going to be good because they can use all the jokes they couldn't because of the fcc and maybe nudity. I just hope they say stevie g@y he 1 what do you think he is 20 he see boobies and hes see food."
Title: RE:ITT: PSP Discussion
Post by: Sir_Stabbalot on August 22, 2005, 08:24:21 AM
So... How are the DS vs PSP sales now?
Title: RE: ITT: PSP Discussion
Post by: KDR_11k on August 22, 2005, 10:32:35 AM
NPD stopped the flow of information, we're back to guessing.
Title: RE: ITT: PSP Discussion
Post by: Stimutacs Addict on September 01, 2005, 06:04:51 PM
CNN states: Europe finally got Sony's PSP after a 5 month delay due to supply shortages....

i didn't even realize that people were still buying the PSP.. it just seems like such a non-factor (maybe I'm too caught up in meteos)
Title: RE:ITT: PSP Discussion
Post by: BlackNMild2k1 on September 06, 2005, 09:08:40 AM
from elsewhere
Quote

Sony’s new PSP console has sold an estimated 185,000 total market hardware units in its launch week, outdoing Nintendo’s DS (87,000 units at launch) to become the most successful UK console launch ever. 24 games were available at launch, the largest for any console, with 20 entering the All Formats Top 40 and 9 games breaking into the Top 10. Games were priced at £34.99 with the console itself retailing at £179.

Sony PSP takes over the All Formats chart this week with the biggest software launch for any console. 20 out of the 24 PSP launch titles enter the All Formats Top 40 with Sony’s ‘Ridge Racer’ (PSP) topping the list, knocking Codemasters’ ‘Brian Lara International Cricket 2005’ (PS2/XB/PC) down to No2 and becoming not only the fastest selling PSP game but also the fastest selling Ridge Racer game across any format. 1 in 5 people who bought a PSP game bought ‘Ridge Racer’, but it was over 6 years ago since a Ridge Racer title reached number 1 in the All Formats chart with Ridge Racer Type 4 (PS1) back in week 17 1999. ‘Brian Lara International Cricket 2005’ is the only non-PSP game in the Top 10 with PSP games filling all the remaining Top 10 positions and Sony claiming the top 2 PSP games with ‘Wipeout Pure’ (PSP) entering the All Formats Chart at No3. Sega’s ‘Virtua Tennis’ and Konami’s ‘Metal Gear Ac!d’ debut at No4 and No5 respectively, holding off EA’s big PSP release ‘Need for Speed: Underground Rivals’ which is a new entry at No6. The most popular type of PSP game is racing with 5 racing games in the Top 10 PSP chart, including ‘Toca Race Driver 2’ at No6 and ‘Midnight Club 3: Dub Edition’ at No7, while out of the 24 PSP games released, 5 are new IP. Non-PSP new releases are eclipsed by the dominance of Sony’s new console with Novalogic’s ‘Delta Force: Black Hawk Down’ (new this week on XB and PS2) debuting at No1 in the Xbox Chart, but only reaching No15 in the All Formats Top 40. Microsoft’s new RPG ‘Dungeon Siege II’ also suffers the same fate, reaching No1 in the PC Full Price Entertainment Chart, but only No33 in an All Formats Top 40 where half of the games are new PSP titles.
The Chart

That is quite impressive for the PSP, wonder if it will hold up, and will the games keep selling, or will movie sales take over......  
Title: RE: ITT: PSP Discussion
Post by: KDR_11k on September 06, 2005, 10:00:17 AM
Ridge Racer was the title Media Markt bundled with the system.

Either way, I doubt this'll hold up for long. There aren't any more games coming to Europe than the US so even the UKers will find out they're not getting a lot of play from their portable station.
Title: RE:ITT: PSP Discussion
Post by: Sir_Stabbalot on September 14, 2005, 03:03:22 PM
Any news on the North American front? Have the 'Nintendogs' mobile divisions encircled and destroyed the enemy?
Title: RE: ITT: PSP Discussion
Post by: PaLaDiN on September 14, 2005, 04:41:14 PM
Of course, the PSP was outselling the DS in the US last I checked, so it seems like a lack of games isn't a problem.
Title: RE:ITT: PSP Discussion
Post by: BlackNMild2k1 on September 16, 2005, 10:02:55 AM
PSP in 3D O_o

Whooo

if you think you were a geek b4.....
using this in public will remove all doubt.
Title: RE:ITT: PSP Discussion
Post by: Toruresu on September 16, 2005, 10:18:02 AM
LOL

So you put your face there, and hold it in place, while playing and touching the buttons. Ahh...maybe is to create a cinema experience for the UMD movies.
Title: RE: ITT: PSP Discussion
Post by: vudu on September 16, 2005, 10:52:27 AM
Wow.  Um ... I'm speachless.  Even more so than when I first saw the Revolution controller.
Title: RE: ITT: PSP Discussion
Post by: KnowsNothing on September 16, 2005, 01:00:27 PM
Aww **** the DS is doomed now.
Title: RE:ITT: PSP Discussion
Post by: Sir_Stabbalot on September 16, 2005, 02:38:30 PM
Sony's trying to rip off teh Virtual Boy!!1!
Title: RE: ITT: PSP Discussion
Post by: Stimutacs Addict on September 17, 2005, 08:09:57 AM
^ just let it go, man... they'll never know what hit 'em
Title: RE: ITT: PSP Discussion
Post by: KDR_11k on September 20, 2005, 11:46:16 PM
The PSP is really the PS Port. Or Remake. Now they're remaking Megaman and Megaman X for it and making a version of Every Extend for it.
Title: RE:ITT: PSP Discussion
Post by: vudu on September 27, 2005, 12:18:12 PM
With all the talk about batteries for the Revolution controller it got me thinking about the rechargable battery in the PSP.  Have there been any reports of the PSP battery losing capacity over time?  I know it happens to pretty much all rechargable batteries, but thus far my SP battery is still treating me pretty well.  However, I don't really trust Sony as much as I do Nintendo.
Title: RE: ITT: PSP Discussion
Post by: KDR_11k on September 27, 2005, 10:35:39 PM
The PSP is how old now? It takes a while until the degradation becomes noticeable.
Title: RE: ITT: PSP Discussion
Post by: vudu on September 28, 2005, 08:43:01 AM
It's been out in Japan since beginning of December 2004.  If you got it at launch and recharge every day that's over 200 recharges.  That seems like enough for the degradation to start.
Title: RE:ITT: PSP Discussion
Post by: Nephilim on September 28, 2005, 09:10:53 AM
sony said there launching a new psp battery late next year, using there new battery technology
people will proberly just buy this new battery, if the one they have now starts running out
Title: RE: ITT: PSP Discussion
Post by: KDR_11k on September 28, 2005, 09:03:40 PM
vudu: Who recharges it daily? And would someone doing that really notice what the maximum capacity on his battery is?
Title: RE: ITT: PSP Discussion
Post by: vudu on September 29, 2005, 08:59:04 AM
I don't know...don't people in Japan ride the train a lot?  I figure a commuter might charge his batteries every day.
Title: RE: ITT: PSP Discussion
Post by: Artimus on October 01, 2005, 09:00:03 AM
So...how big will GTA: LS be? I honestly have no clue...but has any GTA game ever sold poorly? Seems to me to be a huge system seller. Thankfully Nintendo has titles just as big later in the year. I'm just concerned this'll sell millions upon millions of PSPs in North America. Your thoughts? I found this funny, from IGN regarding multiplayer:

"And what about battery life? According to Rockstar, we should be able to squeeze about four hours of gameplay on a single charge."

Four hours? Ew?
Title: RE:ITT: PSP Discussion
Post by: kirby_killer_dedede on October 01, 2005, 12:34:54 PM
er...I'm actually forced to charge my PSP every two days and I just use it for MP3s...I imagine people who use it for gaming are forced to charge daily...
Title: RE: ITT: PSP Discussion
Post by: KDR_11k on October 01, 2005, 11:37:24 PM
I wonder if Rockstar remembers that handhelds require a different save system?
Title: RE:ITT: PSP Discussion
Post by: nickmitch on October 02, 2005, 04:11:52 AM
I wonder if Rockstar remembered Jack Thompson when they put it together.
Title: RE: ITT: PSP Discussion
Post by: Artimus on October 02, 2005, 07:51:51 AM
I feel bad, but I'm really hoping it'll suck...
Title: RE: ITT: PSP Discussion
Post by: KDR_11k on October 02, 2005, 07:51:53 AM
They did, they made a mock site making fun of Jackass Thompson and people like him. "Citizens United Negating Technology".
Title: RE: ITT: PSP Discussion
Post by: stevey on October 04, 2005, 11:20:42 AM
psp get turn into a brick ah ha ha ha ah ha ha ha! suckers
Title: RE:ITT: PSP Discussion
Post by: kirby_killer_dedede on October 04, 2005, 12:03:37 PM
serves us psp owners right!
Title: RE: ITT: PSP Discussion
Post by: TMW on October 04, 2005, 12:32:44 PM
Reminds me of the "GB Mod" that was put out after the DS was released. Was supposed to increase your wifi range and enable you to play GBC and GB games on the DS.

Really, it just bricked your system.

Seriously, do people get off on this sort of thing?  
Title: RE:ITT: PSP Discussion
Post by: nickmitch on October 04, 2005, 12:46:39 PM
They're video game terrorists, fanboys so commited to one system that they try to sabatodge(sp?) another.
Title: RE: ITT: PSP Discussion
Post by: kirby_killer_dedede on October 04, 2005, 05:50:04 PM
Soon all white people on flights to Japan will have to take their shoes off...
Title: RE: ITT: PSP Discussion
Post by: KDR_11k on October 05, 2005, 12:14:20 AM
That's the PSP equivalent of a virus. These things happen and if you trust random people on the internet and let their binaries flash your firmware hat result is to be expected.
Title: RE: ITT: PSP Discussion
Post by: vudu on October 05, 2005, 09:29:36 AM
So does that make the DS mod the equivalent of letting someone convince you it's a good idea to open your PC and solder your graphics card to your hard drive?
Title: RE:ITT: PSP Discussion
Post by: nickmitch on October 05, 2005, 02:02:55 PM
Is it possible to fix the PSPs?
Title: RE: ITT: PSP Discussion
Post by: KDR_11k on October 05, 2005, 10:33:14 PM
Send 'em to Sony and hope for the best. A FUBARd firmware usually requires replacing the flash chip with the firmware on it.
Title: RE:ITT: PSP Discussion
Post by: nickmitch on October 07, 2005, 04:30:02 PM
Wow, is that really the only way?
Sony better offer to fix those for free.
I'm so glad I'm waiting until someone just hands me a PSP for free to get one.
Title: RE: ITT: PSP Discussion
Post by: stevey on October 07, 2005, 04:36:49 PM
"Sony better offer to fix those for free. "

sony doing it for free lol sony will say it's your falt and make you buy a new one.
Title: RE:ITT: PSP Discussion
Post by: nickmitch on October 08, 2005, 02:31:45 PM
Now that I think about it, it's YOUR fault if you fell for downloading something NOT directly from Sony's website.
Title: RE: ITT: PSP Discussion
Post by: Zach on October 08, 2005, 05:47:33 PM
Sony hasnt been responsible even when it is their fault, there were stories back when the PSP first launched that sony wasnt taking back PSPs that had dead pixels.  So they are difinately not gonna take responsability when it really isnt their fault
Title: RE: ITT: PSP Discussion
Post by: Artimus on October 08, 2005, 06:20:43 PM
They shouldn't fix this, because it's not their fault. It's also voiding the warranty.
Title: RE:ITT: PSP Discussion
Post by: BlackNMild2k1 on October 08, 2005, 07:06:17 PM
Don't know if this weas mentioned yet

4GB PSP HD w/ built in 3600mh X2 battery power
Quote

Datel have done it again!  This is truly what all PSP owners have been waiting for!  4GB of storage!  Up until now, the largest storage that has been available to PSP owners was the 1Gb Pro Duo Memory Stick.  Then within the last week or so, we have seen the emergence of the 2Gb Memory Sticks, with their large price tags! However Datel are always on the lookout for the next exceptional console-related product.  One of the first major products for the PSP from Datel was the X2 battery -  with this you could double the playing time of your PSP.

And now they have gone one step further!

4x the memory(of 1GB MS ProDuo) and 2x the battery life, but thats not all...
also get a Max media get connected cable and software, which are all included and for less than the price of a 2GB MSPD or two 1GB MSPD

Title: RE: ITT: PSP Discussion
Post by: kirby_killer_dedede on October 09, 2005, 05:49:22 AM
WHATATA!?

I know what I'm asking for christmas...50 some songs isn't enough. Bagh
Title: RE:ITT: PSP Discussion
Post by: Sir_Stabbalot on October 09, 2005, 10:34:30 AM
That thing costs as much as a DS... I think...
Title: RE:ITT: PSP Discussion
Post by: BlackNMild2k1 on October 09, 2005, 10:39:50 AM
yeah, its cost about $150.00 or so
Title: RE: ITT: PSP Discussion
Post by: kirby_killer_dedede on October 09, 2005, 11:15:50 AM
Er...150 GBP is close to 260 USD.  So it actually costs more than the PSP itself.  
Title: RE:ITT: PSP Discussion
Post by: Sir_Stabbalot on October 09, 2005, 12:35:11 PM
Quote

Originally posted by: kirby_killer_dedede
Er...150 GBP is close to 260 USD.  So it actually costs more than the PSP itself.  


Ah, I didn't notice that.

So, it costs as much as a 4 Gig iPod nano (not including the PSP itself).  
Title: RE:ITT: PSP Discussion
Post by: BlackNMild2k1 on October 09, 2005, 12:38:30 PM
Quote

Originally posted by: kirby_killer_dedede
Er...150 GBP is close to 260 USD.  So it actually costs more than the PSP itself.  
Ooops, had my monetary region wrong
Title: RE: ITT: PSP Discussion
Post by: Grant10k on October 09, 2005, 06:37:40 PM
I know I'm a little late for the topic, but would it not benefit Sony to fix the brick'ed psp's for free. If they force you to buy a new one that's money out of their pocket.
Title: RE:ITT: PSP Discussion
Post by: BlackNMild2k1 on October 09, 2005, 06:53:21 PM
its money out of their pocket either way, it would atleast be best to have their "sold" #'s to look better in comparison to the competition, by making you buy a new one(see PS2).
Title: RE: ITT: PSP Discussion
Post by: Artimus on October 24, 2005, 04:33:13 PM
So...D-Day for the PSP is today. Liberty Stories is now out. What could be the last great battle of the PSP's life has begun!

IGN gives it a 9/10. The lowest score of the GTA games yet, but still very strong. 1UP and the Official Playstation Magazine give it the same. EGM gave it a %91.7. Good reviews.
Title: RE:ITT: PSP Discussion
Post by: wandering on October 25, 2005, 05:19:19 AM
We come to it al last. The great battle of our time.

Seriously, there's no way a single game will change the PSP's fortunes. As strong as GTA is, it's no match for the waves upon waves of titles that are filling the DS's rosters.  
Title: RE: ITT: PSP Discussion
Post by: KDR_11k on October 25, 2005, 08:14:37 AM
Any notable differences between LCS and the home console versions?
Title: RE: ITT: PSP Discussion
Post by: Stimutacs Addict on October 25, 2005, 09:31:05 AM
wandering: we can never underestimate GTA. People are dumb. They dont have an mp3 player, and sony offers them one at a ridiculous price. They just may take it.

we should be thanking Apple for putting an ipod in everybody's hands... without the ipod mini and now nano, people would be buying many more PSPs, methinks
Title: RE:ITT: PSP Discussion
Post by: wandering on October 25, 2005, 10:17:30 AM
People are dumb, sure, but not quite dumb enough to pay several hundred dollars for something they can already get on their playstation or pc (or gameboy!).

Quote

we should be thanking Apple for putting an ipod in everybody's hands... without the ipod mini and now nano, people would be buying many more PSPs, methinks

Don't forget about the ipod video - which pretty much just destroyed any remaining reasons one might've had for wanting to own a psp.  
Title: RE:ITT: PSP Discussion
Post by: BlackNMild2k1 on October 25, 2005, 11:30:45 AM
Quote

Originally posted by: wandering

Don't forget about the ipod video - which pretty much just destroyed any remaining reasons one might've had for wanting to own a psp.

except for the games, its all about the games, right? (that is its(psp) primary reason for existence right?)
Title: RE:ITT: PSP Discussion
Post by: wandering on October 26, 2005, 01:04:59 AM
actually......

Quote

In March of this year, Kaz Hirai told attendees at the PSP launch party: “If someone told you that the PSP is a portable gaming device, shoot these people. The PSP is not a portable gaming device, it is really a convergent portable entertainment device.”

!
Title: RE:ITT: PSP Discussion
Post by: BlackNMild2k1 on October 26, 2005, 01:35:53 AM
Quote

Originally posted by: wandering
actually......

Quote

In March of this year, Kaz Hirai told attendees at the PSP launch party: “If someone told you that the PSP is a portable gaming device, shoot these people. The PSP is not a portable gaming device, it is really a convergent portable entertainment device.”

!

*reaches for bulletproof vest*
Title: RE: ITT: PSP Discussion
Post by: TMW on October 27, 2005, 08:49:05 AM
I love how Sony is like, the Anti-Nintendo.  Reggies all, "We're about making games!" and making those games more appealing to everybody, and then Sony's all "THE PS3 IS NOT A GAME CONSOLE. IT HAS LINUX." and "Shoot people who say our videogame console isn't a videogame console."  

Seriously.  How can be people still buy their bullcrap?

Erm...and I mean, the stuff that comes out of the mouths of the higher ups, not the merchandise.  
Title: RE: ITT: PSP Discussion
Post by: Chris1 on October 27, 2005, 01:42:44 PM
Any news on the PSP GTA sales?  At my local Walmart yesterday they seemed pretty well instock so it didnt seem to gather much intrest here woo hoo!, in other good news there were only 2 copies of Metroid pinball left!
Title: RE: ITT: PSP Discussion
Post by: Zach on October 28, 2005, 09:58:25 AM
from the article wandering posted

"We guarantee that each of the console manufacturers will continue to beat the 'this is not a game console' drum loudly over the next year as they launch their new game devices. Will any of them succeed at capturing the mass market this time around?"

Well it sure is obvious that the writers of that article havent even listened to ANYTHING nintendo has said.

 
Title: RE: ITT: PSP Discussion
Post by: stevey on October 28, 2005, 12:21:53 PM
HA HA HA sony saying psp isn't for gaming and GTA:loser story bombing is funny LOL! only Kutaragi OD-ing and dies is funnier  
Title: RE: ITT: PSP Discussion
Post by: Artimus on October 28, 2005, 01:04:02 PM
GTA didn't bomb...why would you say that? Because one Wal-Mart had stocks? Wal-Mart gets in a TON of copies.
Title: RE:ITT: PSP Discussion
Post by: nickmitch on October 28, 2005, 01:07:28 PM
They ARE the Wal-Mart.
Title: RE: ITT: PSP Discussion
Post by: TMW on October 28, 2005, 01:15:23 PM
Wasn't GTA for the PSP supposed to be like...horrid with load screens or something?
Title: RE:ITT: PSP Discussion
Post by: nickmitch on October 28, 2005, 04:56:38 PM
Isn't that like, half of the PSP games?
Title: RE: ITT: PSP Discussion
Post by: kirby_killer_dedede on October 31, 2005, 12:16:26 PM
For Ape Escape PSP, there's literally a load screen for the title screen, then a load screen for another load screen for a menu that takes you to a load screen that takes you to the level-chooser place that takes you to another load screen that takes you to the actual game that will probably lead you into a room which will prompt another load screen.

That's 100% factual.  Considering each load screen is 30-45 seconds it takes around 4-5 minutes to actually get the game going after you turn on the PSP.  That's ridiculous.
Title: RE:ITT: PSP Discussion
Post by: nickmitch on October 31, 2005, 12:49:48 PM
Quote

Originally posted by: kirby_killer_dedede
For Ape Escape PSP, there's literally a load screen for the title screen, then a load screen for another load screen for a menu that takes you to a load screen that takes you to the level-chooser place that takes you to another load screen that takes you to the actual game that will probably lead you into a room which will prompt another load screen.

That's 100% factual.  Considering each load screen is 30-45 seconds it takes around 4-5 minutes to actually get the game going after you turn on the PSP.  That's ridiculous.


*Kisses DS cartridge*
Title: RE: ITT: PSP Discussion
Post by: Stimutacs Addict on November 07, 2005, 08:09:09 AM
anyone play GTA yet? is Sony's trump card about to fire the DS (lame, lame, lame)?   just wondering, because the last time I saw a PSP in someone's hands was over a month ago.
Title: RE: ITT: PSP Discussion
Post by: stevey on November 07, 2005, 10:49:59 AM
No the game still loading...
Title: RE:ITT: PSP Discussion
Post by: IceCold on November 07, 2005, 12:35:44 PM
Once again,
Title: RE:ITT: PSP Discussion
Post by: Sir_Stabbalot on November 07, 2005, 03:33:43 PM
So... Any sale numbers?
Title: RE:ITT: PSP Discussion
Post by: IceCold on November 07, 2005, 03:50:26 PM
October NPD #s should come out around the middle of the month; I'm REALLY looking forward to seeing them.
Title: RE: ITT: PSP Discussion
Post by: vudu on November 08, 2005, 08:36:57 AM
Which reminds me, we never got September NPD #s for PSP, did we?
Title: RE: ITT: PSP Discussion
Post by: Sir_Stabbalot on November 08, 2005, 11:33:27 AM
I haven't heard a single thing about GTA for the PSP. Seems like it bombed. Am I correct?
Title: RE:ITT: PSP Discussion
Post by: Darkheart on November 08, 2005, 12:23:40 PM
Ok first of all, I can see no one read reviews....................  As far as I have heard the loading is not much, only between the 2 parts of the city and even that is pretty quick.   I was going to read the full review on IGN but it was like over 6-7 pages long which in my opinion is a novel not a review but anywhooo.... All of the reviews gave it good numbers.   As far as sales go tho I don't know, I don't keep up with those things.
Title: RE: ITT: PSP Discussion
Post by: KDR_11k on November 08, 2005, 07:31:40 PM
I was going to read the full review on IGN but it was like over 6-7 pages long

Which of course makes you wonder why exactly they need to split an online document into multiple pages. The answer is obviously so they can put more ads in there.
Title: RE:ITT: PSP Discussion
Post by: Spak-Spang on November 09, 2005, 06:48:31 AM
I can't read those long reviews anymore.

IGN used to have reviews that were 2-3 pages long.  Perhaps 4-5 on BIG games like Zelda OoT, Grand Theft Auto, and the Final Fantasy stories.

Now the Reviews are too long to read, and when you do take the time to read them you realize they are recycling information from their previews to make the reviews so long...sometimes they don't even rewrite that information.

A video game review should be short and sweet.  Touching on everything you need to know but not going into extreme detail.

Title: RE:ITT: PSP Discussion
Post by: Darkheart on November 09, 2005, 08:44:16 AM
Agreed the other day i read a review on FF7 Advent Children and the guy practically wrote the whole plot of the movie. . . . . . . That was ridiculous you just need to touch base with the plot not retell the whole thing :/!
Title: RE: ITT: PSP Discussion
Post by: KDR_11k on November 10, 2005, 04:45:05 AM
Well, considering FFAC has a plot that'd fit on the back of a videogame box between the "Awesome graphics!" and "Choose from 6 Characters!" bulletpoints that really doesn't come as a surprise.
Title: RE:ITT: PSP Discussion
Post by: Darkheart on November 10, 2005, 07:48:23 AM
Ok let me reword that they practically wrote out the movie, rather than the plot point!
Title: RE: ITT: PSP Discussion
Post by: Artimus on November 30, 2005, 05:07:45 PM
According to analysts PSP hardware sales in November were "surprisingly bad."
Title: RE: ITT: PSP Discussion
Post by: KDR_11k on December 01, 2005, 03:50:19 AM
They probably expected half a million units sold because of GTALCS.
Title: RE:ITT: PSP Discussion
Post by: BlackNMild2k1 on December 15, 2005, 08:24:34 AM
Have you seen the new PSP commercial?

Badly hand drawn pencil sketch cartoon

Dustball 1 - :rolling across the carpet:
duh duhduh
:rolls up to dustball 2:
HEY!!! were gonna roll outside, wanna come?

Dustball 2 - I can't, I'm watching carpet.

Dustball 1 - Owww, but there is portable carpet.

Dustball 2 - You got to be kidding

Dustball 1 - Hey, hey, hey, have you ever heard of dustball kid?.

Dustball 2 - Not really.

Dustball 1 - Well believe me when I say there is carpet you can watch OUTside
:rolls away: Duh duhduh duhduhduhdun

Announcer - PSP, its like carpet, you can watch outside

-----------------------------

what the hell is that supposed to mean? Am I supposed to want a PSP after watching that or am I supposed to want to vacuum my carpet? I am confused...
 
Title: RE: ITT: PSP Discussion
Post by: KDR_11k on December 15, 2005, 08:29:57 AM
It's the perfect metaphor. The PSP is about as interesting as staring at your carpet. Except now you can do it anywhere.
Title: RE:ITT: PSP Discussion
Post by: BlackNMild2k1 on December 15, 2005, 08:37:28 AM
I just saw another one, same style as the first only this on was about 2 squirrels


S1 - "come out and play"

S2 - "I can't, I'm playing NUT"

S1 - " but theres portable NUT"

S2 - "WHAAAAAT"

S1 - "Yeaaah, it a NUT you can play with outside"

Announcer - "PSP, its like a NUT you can play with outside"

----------------

I wish I was making this up, but I've always thought my imagination was alot more creative than this...
Title: RE: ITT: PSP Discussion
Post by: stevey on December 15, 2005, 11:37:52 AM
I saw them both and a third one with gansters lol sony must be aiming its ad to really retarded folk or big suit at hq have got more crazyer/higher.
Title: RE: ITT: PSP Discussion
Post by: KnowsNothing on December 15, 2005, 11:49:55 AM
They're showing THOSE commercials after Kurtagi has CLEARLY stated that the PSP is not a portable?  I'm shocked!
Title: RE: ITT: PSP Discussion
Post by: KDR_11k on December 16, 2005, 05:15:51 AM
SCEA doesn't agree with SCEJ. Not even on what button should do what.
Title: RE:ITT: PSP Discussion
Post by: Pryopizm on December 29, 2005, 12:31:46 AM
Quote

Originally posted by: darkheart
Ok first of all, I can see no one read reviews....................  As far as I have heard the loading is not much, only between the 2 parts of the city and even that is pretty quick.   I was going to read the full review on IGN but it was like over 6-7 pages long which in my opinion is a novel not a review but anywhooo.... All of the reviews gave it good numbers.   As far as sales go tho I don't know, I don't keep up with those things.


I'm new to the forums side of PGC, so forgive my late reply, but that is hilarious.  IGN was the first site I found when I got back into gaming and I love it to death, but the reviews were mind-boggling to me.  I felt as if they used the manual as a checklist and reviewed every single aspect.  I can only assume IGN writers get paid by the word.



Title: RE: ITT: PSP Discussion
Post by: Spak-Spang on December 29, 2005, 04:08:31 AM
I thought those commercials were funny.  But I didn't want to buy the PSP after watching it.  I didn't even know what the PSP did after watching it.

Sometimes advertisers get the idea that all they need is something catchy and funny, but its not true.

The Taco Bell dog never increased Taco Bell's sells at all while the commercials were running.  Eventually Taco Bell decided to change advertising commercials because of it.

Title: RE: ITT: PSP Discussion
Post by: Renny on December 29, 2005, 05:19:38 AM
And now everyone and their flamboyant step-brother has a chiuaua. No one wins.
Title: RE:ITT: PSP Discussion
Post by: odifiend on December 29, 2005, 07:05:38 AM
Quote

Originally posted by: Spak-Spang
The Taco Bell dog never increased Taco Bell's sells at all while the commercials were running.  Eventually Taco Bell decided to change advertising commercials because of it.

Actually Taco Bell got complaints from some of the Hispanic community that they were being stereotyped and pulled it.  Perhaps that was a factor though.
Title: RE:ITT: PSP Discussion
Post by: BlackNMild2k1 on December 29, 2005, 07:38:17 AM
Not to mention everyone went from thinking that it was rat meat in the food to dog meat.

Quote

Originally posted by: Spak-Spang
I thought those commercials were funny.  But I didn't want to buy the PSP after watching it.  I didn't even know what the PSP did after watching it.
I think they had to advertise it that way because they didn't have any actual games to show off on the system. They should continue to market the PSP to the crowd that thinks it plays regular PS1&2 games and DVD movies, that why so many people bought it in the first place.
Title: RE:ITT: PSP Discussion
Post by: Sir_Stabbalot on December 29, 2005, 10:06:11 AM
^I can confirm that.
Title: RE:ITT: PSP Discussion
Post by: darknight06 on January 09, 2006, 01:01:43 PM
Now this is an interesting turn of events...

GTA Liberty City Stories to head to current gen platform.

Yeah, if you bought a PSP for it you'll be able to play it right now but man that sucks if that was the only reason you got it.
Title: RE: ITT: PSP Discussion
Post by: KnowsNothing on January 09, 2006, 01:04:27 PM
Ahahaha, this is pretty much worse than PS2 getting RE4, except they at least waited until AFTER the game had launched to make the announcement.
Title: RE: ITT: PSP Discussion
Post by: KDR_11k on January 10, 2006, 06:29:18 AM
I don't think it's bad. After all, the PSP is a portable. If Nintendo made a graphically enhanced port of MKDS for the Rev would that hurt the DS? No. You can't play the Rev on a train.
Title: RE:ITT: PSP Discussion
Post by: BlackNMild2k1 on January 10, 2006, 07:50:43 AM
Quote

Originally posted by: KDR_11k
You can't play the Rev on a train.
Or can you?

 
Title: RE: ITT: PSP Discussion
Post by: couchmonkey on January 10, 2006, 09:12:44 AM
More like killeD app!
Title: RE:ITT: PSP Discussion
Post by: BlackNMild2k1 on April 02, 2006, 01:08:51 PM
Is THIS the beginning of the end of last place Sony can find positive income from the PSP?

We know Sony loses money for every PSP sold, we know UMD movies are slowly becoming unsupported due to lack of sales, and PSP games sell even less than the movies. The last positive income for Sony directly related to PSP is the increase in Memstick sales.

SD cards are cheaper, and now that an adapter exist, do you think people might start abandon the still overpriced(compared to the competition) memstick even though they have come down in price?

PSP, Its like seaweed you can watch outside

Title: RE: ITT: PSP Discussion
Post by: TrueNerd on April 02, 2006, 07:53:27 PM
You know what would right the ship? A couple of games that justify the system's existence. Problem solved.  
Title: RE: ITT: PSP Discussion
Post by: wandering on April 02, 2006, 08:49:46 PM
Quote

I don't think it's bad. After all, the PSP is a portable. If Nintendo made a graphically enhanced port of MKDS for the Rev would that hurt the DS? No. You can't play the Rev on a train.

This is the whole logic behind the psp...and personally, I don't think it holds. PSP supporters say it doesn't matter that the psp doesn't have any original games, because you're paying for portability. I say I want original games and don't want to pay for the same games twice.
Title: RE:ITT: PSP Discussion
Post by: animecyberrat on April 02, 2006, 09:57:18 PM
well I am going to get a psps eventualy just because it loosk cool and can do all kindsof other neats tuff, but I am going to buy mine used or refurbished so I garuntee Sony doesnt get any of my money for it. Same thing Id id for Ps2 I got one lst year used then sold it for more than we paid for it, toa guy whos ps2 broke down recently. ok IOw s kidding baout getting a psp it sucks and I hope it kills sony.  
Title: RE:ITT: PSP Discussion
Post by: Smash_Brother on April 03, 2006, 08:12:48 AM
Quote

Originally posted by: animecyberrat
well I am going to get a psps eventualy just because it loosk cool and can do all kindsof other neats tuff, but I am going to buy mine used or refurbished so I garuntee Sony doesnt get any of my money for it. Same thing Id id for Ps2 I got one lst year used then sold it for more than we paid for it, toa guy whos ps2 broke down recently. ok IOw s kidding baout getting a psp it sucks and I hope it kills sony.


Save your money and buy a portable DVD player. They're cheaper and tend to have lovely clamshell designs to protect the screen.
Title: RE:ITT: PSP Discussion
Post by: animecyberrat on April 04, 2006, 03:10:58 PM
Quote

Originally posted by: Smash_Brother
Quote

Originally posted by: animecyberrat
well I am going to get a psps eventualy just because it loosk cool and can do all kindsof other neats tuff, but I am going to buy mine used or refurbished so I garuntee Sony doesnt get any of my money for it. Same thing Id id for Ps2 I got one lst year used then sold it for more than we paid for it, toa guy whos ps2 broke down recently. ok IOw s kidding baout getting a psp it sucks and I hope it kills sony.


Save your money and buy a portable DVD player. They're cheaper and tend to have lovely clamshell designs to protect the screen.


did you not read last sentance
Title: RE: ITT: PSP Discussion
Post by: Smash_Brother on April 04, 2006, 06:05:47 PM
To be honest, the shock of the first sentence made me jump on the reply button immediately.
Title: RE:ITT: PSP Discussion
Post by: Smash_Brother on April 04, 2006, 06:18:31 PM
Quote

Originally posted by: KDR_11k
I don't think it's bad. After all, the PSP is a portable. If Nintendo made a graphically enhanced port of MKDS for the Rev would that hurt the DS? No. You can't play the Rev on a train.


Thing is, a Rev version of MK will not be MK DS. It would be it's own version of MK (MK Rev, of course). This isn't the case for GTA:LCL. They're putting the game on the PS2 because Rockstar needs the money and it isn't selling on the PSP.

Also, I don't buy the train bit. I'm sure if you did a poll you'd find that the MAJORITY of people who own a DS play it in their own home (mostly in the bathroom, but that's beside the point). I can almost guarantee this because the easiest place to find a wifi network which is both free and reliable is in your own home, and we all know how popular wifi is. This makes the "you can play it on a train!" argument far less persuasive. The most fun I've had with my DS is in my own home, period. I'd almost go as far to say that the DS is neutered without wifi.

GTA was supposed to be the REASON to buy a PSP, and it must have failed because the sales were so horrid that Rockstar is porting the game to the PS2 in an attempt to recoup development costs. This is not a "We figured we'd port it anyway." ordeal. This is "We need to recoup losses!", especially since Rockstar is hurting from when their stock plummeted during the hot-coffee fiasco.

You don't see Nintendo rushing out to port Nintendogs to the GC (with Mario Party's mic), nor Brain Age, Hunters, Tetris, etc. I'm quite certain that the GC's network adapter could connect to the same servers as wifi. But these titles aren't being ported because they're selling on the DS, thus there's no need to attempt to recoup any losses.

This is a desperation move on the part of Rockstar. The fact that GTA can't even sell PSPs means that either GTA or the PSP is doomed. Could be either one, and the sales of LCL on the PS2 will probably answer that question for us.
Title: RE: ITT: PSP Discussion
Post by: KDR_11k on April 05, 2006, 12:41:34 AM
Thing is, a Rev version of MK will not be MK DS. It would be it's own version of MK (MK Rev, of course). This isn't the case for GTA:LCL. They're putting the game on the PS2 because Rockstar needs the money and it isn't selling on the PSP.

If LCS is not GTA3, how is it not the PSP's own version of GTA? Okay, so it's getting a port. BFD, doesn't make it any less of an own version. But meh, I'll start caring when I hear about Capcom bringing Rockman Rockman to the PC.

Also, I don't buy the train bit. I'm sure if you did a poll you'd find that the MAJORITY of people who own a DS play it in their own home

Their choice. It's like buying a laptop and only using it at home. I'm using my DS almost exclusively in a train or at the university when I'm waiting.

You don't see Nintendo rushing out to port Nintendogs to the GC (with Mario Party's mic), nor Brain Age, Hunters, Tetris, etc. I'm quite certain that the GC's network adapter could connect to the same servers as wifi. But these titles aren't being ported because they're selling on the DS, thus there's no need to attempt to recoup any losses.

Advocatus Diaboli: Well, it's not like the games would have a chance of selling any better on the Cube, after all it's Nintendo's worst selling system recently.
Title: RE:ITT: PSP Discussion
Post by: Smash_Brother on April 05, 2006, 09:44:54 PM
Quote

Originally posted by: KDR_11k If LCS is not GTA3, how is it not the PSP's own version of GTA? Okay, so it's getting a port. BFD, doesn't make it any less of an own version. But meh, I'll start caring when I hear about Capcom bringing Rockman Rockman to the PC.


The point is, they wouldn't port it if it was selling enough copies on the PSP that a port wasn't necessary to recoup expenses.

More to the point, they wouldn't be porting it so very early after its launch on the PSP. That's what gives it away the most in my mind.

Quote

Their choice. It's like buying a laptop and only using it at home. I'm using my DS almost exclusively in a train or at the university when I'm waiting.


I guess that part of the argument cancels itself out cause you can play Mario Kart and AC on the train as well.

Quote

Advocatus Diaboli: Well, it's not like the games would have a chance of selling any better on the Cube, after all it's Nintendo's worst selling system recently.


True, but my point remains: this was done by Rockstar as a desperation move, not as an effort to bring more content to the PS2 for no particular reason.

They needed the money, it wasn't selling on the PSP, they decided to bring it to the PS2, in a hurry.

What was the time between the launch of LSC (not sure why I called it LSL. I must be thinking of "Leisure Suit Larry" or something) and the announcement that the game would be ported to the PS2? Answer that question and you'll see just what I mean.
Title: RE: ITT: PSP Discussion
Post by: stevey on April 19, 2006, 05:02:49 AM
GTA Liberty City Stories to be 19.99 on ps2 lol the psp lcs cost $50.
Title: RE: ITT: PSP Discussion
Post by: TrueNerd on April 19, 2006, 09:48:29 AM
ROFLMFAO

Who wants to take bets that the game is BETTER on the PS2, at less then half price? I personally think you'd be a fool to bet against that one, but a fool's money can support my $25 a day drug addiction just the same.  
Title: RE: ITT: PSP Discussion
Post by: TMW on April 19, 2006, 09:06:59 PM
Well, considering one of the major flaws people had with the game was the lack of control you had with the PSP "nub" and d-pad...the game should playu quite nicely on the PS2.
Title: RE: ITT: PSP Discussion
Post by: wandering on April 19, 2006, 09:09:28 PM
Yes, but the graphics will be psp quality, correct?
Title: RE:ITT: PSP Discussion
Post by: animecyberrat on April 19, 2006, 09:19:15 PM
I will give PSP that though, the graphics lookgood enough to go both ways. (psp to PS2 and vice versa)
Title: RE: ITT: PSP Discussion
Post by: wandering on April 19, 2006, 11:49:07 PM
PSP graphics, while good, aren't PS2 quality when blown up, I don't think.
Title: RE: ITT: PSP Discussion
Post by: KDR_11k on April 20, 2006, 08:16:19 AM
LCS takes place in Liberty City, right? Rockstar can probably use a lot of their old PS2 assets then.
Title: RE: ITT: PSP Discussion
Post by: wandering on April 20, 2006, 11:05:24 PM
Good point.

On a completely different topic, I found this interesting.

Essentially, Sony has launched an iTunes music store-like service for the PSP in Japan, mainly for TV shows/anime. Except, not only can't you copy the content, the content is timed. Ugg. Think one dollar for a music video that you can only watch for a week. Or $54 for one month access to all episodes of a certain series.

The interface looks nice, though.
Title: RE:ITT: PSP Discussion
Post by: BlackNMild2k1 on April 21, 2006, 01:24:05 AM
Quote

Originally posted by: wandering
Good point.

On a completely different topic, I found this interesting.

Essentially, Sony has launched an iTunes music store-like service for the PSP in Japan, mainly for TV shows/anime. Except, not only can't you copy the content, the content is timed. Ugg. Think one dollar for a music video that you can only watch for a week. Or $54 for one month access to all episodes of a certain series.

The interface looks nice, though.
Old news(that it was coming out) & Bad idea(since it didn't work b4). Remember DivX @ circuit city? buy this DVD for $9.99 for X amount of time but have to pay $1.99 to watch it again after that(didn't it work like that?)
Title: RE: ITT: PSP Discussion
Post by: KDR_11k on April 21, 2006, 04:10:49 AM
It's called DRM, they are trying to make people accept that crap so maybe in three years you pay 25€ for a DVD that you can watch once.
Title: RE: ITT: PSP Discussion
Post by: NinGurl69 *huggles on April 21, 2006, 05:58:46 AM
BnM: that was called DIVX.  The "DivX" video compressor was named after DIVX as a spoof.
Title: RE: ITT: PSP Discussion
Post by: KDR_11k on April 21, 2006, 07:20:55 AM
Wasn't it "DivX" and "DivX ;-)" ?
Title: RE:ITT: PSP Discussion
Post by: Ages on April 21, 2006, 11:52:27 AM
It was definetely  DivX
Title: RE:ITT: PSP Discussion
Post by: NinGurl69 *huggles on April 21, 2006, 02:03:52 PM
Quote

Originally posted by: KDR_11k
Wasn't it "DivX" and "DivX ;-)" ?


``"DivX" is not to be confused with "DIVX", an unrelated attempt at a new DVD rental system employed by the US retailer Circuit City. Early versions of DivX included only a codec, and were named "DivX ;-)", where the winking emoticon was a tongue-in-cheek reference to the failed DIVX system``

Wickey

The smiley was dropped when some of the developers decided to license the video technology and make a business out of it.

And there is no "Divx".
Title: RE:ITT: PSP Discussion
Post by: BlackNMild2k1 on April 21, 2006, 08:13:37 PM
Hey I had all the right letters in all the right places, and my point still stands .
Title: RE: ITT: PSP Discussion
Post by: wandering on April 23, 2006, 10:32:00 PM
I never undertsood DIVX. They expected people to pay for a seperate system just to watch special discs that expired after a set period of time? At least that thing with the DVDs that wore out after a set number days sort-of made sense.

The fact is, though, nobody wants a product which self-destructs. Unless it contains top-secret instructions for an impossible spy mission.
Title: RE: ITT: PSP Discussion
Post by: KDR_11k on April 24, 2006, 10:25:39 AM
I think the original divx was supposed to become standard in all DVD players and you'd most likely not be able to buy some movies on permanent discs.
Title: RE: ITT: PSP Discussion
Post by: stevey on June 28, 2006, 10:08:45 AM
Since sony cant make any good psp game their porting 7,000 ps1 game to the psp by 07 lol so no more rearview mirror for the psp.
Title: RE: ITT: PSP Discussion
Post by: Spak-Spang on June 28, 2006, 11:03:30 AM
The PS1 had 7,000 games?  I call BS on that.  I just don't believe it.  Did the NES have that many games?  Or the Super Nintendo?  The NES had the longest life cycle and highest 3rd party support of any system...and I don't recall it having that many games.

Title: RE: ITT: PSP Discussion
Post by: capamerica on June 28, 2006, 11:48:01 AM
"As of March 2005, there were 7,743 software titles available (this figure counts games released in multiple regions as separate titles)"
-Wikipedia

So if there are infact 7,000 titles coming out that would be that we would have at least 3 versions of the same game. And 5(or 8 we don't know if GH count) versions of Final Fantasy VII.

A lot of people are calling BS on that story. One major flaw in the idea that all the PSOne titels will be ported is the whole little issue of the PSP missing R2, L2 and a right analog stick.  
Title: RE: ITT: PSP Discussion
Post by: Ceric on June 28, 2006, 12:03:45 PM
Don't forget to count each individual Mini-game.  Those are games too.  How about collections.  4 games what 3 regions.  That's 12 games right there.  

Ok let's say that every game came out in every region and there is Three regions.  That would give us 2,581 Unique games.  How about that number?  I still think it's to big but the Nintendo list of Cube games is much bigger then I ever knew about.  So who knows.
Title: RE: ITT: PSP Discussion
Post by: BlackNMild2k1 on June 28, 2006, 06:47:24 PM
Well if they could do that then maybe I would finally have a reason to pick up a PSP, I missed alot of PS1 games I've wanted to play and I know Bittorrent will my friend.

I've been thinking about getting a PS2 once it drops down to about $75 new just to play al the games I've missed out on being on Nintendo systems only all these years.
Title: RE: ITT: PSP Discussion
Post by: KDR_11k on June 28, 2006, 08:55:32 PM
Considering that 90% of those PS1 games are the kind that Nintendo didn't allow on their console because that was the type that crashed the 2600...
Title: RE:ITT: PSP Discussion
Post by: Deguello on June 29, 2006, 09:06:34 AM
There is also the matter of reformatting every single PS1 game in order to function on a squished widescreen.

The problem with this sort of thing is that a lot of the hotly desired PS1 games were multi-disc.  Even if you take into account redundant data across discs, you are still looking at downloads in excess of 500 Megabytes at the least, an absolute nightmare for dialup, which probably won't be supported anyway.  In addition to the aforementioned screen formatting required and the possible control formatting CapAmerica mentioned, you are looking at a lot of effort just to put something on a download service.  So possibly not every single PS1 title ever will get the download treatment (i.e. Jumping Flash and Bubsy 3D).  So then the effort is relegated to games worth the effort to do so.

But then here is another flaw in logic.  If you are going to all that effort, why not just sell it standalone?  I know the Ian's of the world hate it, but ports are actually a good idea from time to time.  Many of the GBA's best sellers were SNES ports with a few added bonuses.  Even one of the DS's highest sellers is an N64 port, althought it is not THE highest (go Nintendogs).  And while the PSP gets derided for ports, it is not necessarily the fact that it has a lot of ports.  It's that it doesn't have the RIGHT ports.  Like the upcoming Def Jam Vendetta: Fight for New York: The Takeover.  I'm not sure anybody wanted that on the CONSOLES, much less a handheld.  But having FF7-FF9 and Metal Gear Solid 1 ports at launch would have definitely helped out the PSP's library troubles at launch.  And they would have reached a higher audience of PSP owners than PSP owners who happen to have broadband, who happen to remember some old PS1 games, and who happen to have the desire to download old PS1 games on a download service.

By contrast, the Wii download service is much different, as the maximum dowload there probably will not exceed 64 MB at the absolute most (unless that TG-CD Castlevania game somehow gets on there.)  For games like Super Metroid and Pilotwings, it would be more costly to develop, test, manufacture, package, and attempt to market ports of these games on the GBA or DS.  Considering they barely exceed 5 MB total, it would be much wiser to offer them and the rest of the respective legacy system's library as a boon to a new console, and in the Wii's case offering the most robust and extensive backwards compatibility lineup in the history of the industry.  They throw them up on the service with no effort and Nintendo gets revenue for, basically, electrical signals.  Nintendo is smart here, maximizing the profitibality of classic games while refraining from a high amount of effort to make them available.

But I do find it humorous that the titles the PSP audience wants most are not games made for the PSP.
Title: RE:ITT: PSP Discussion
Post by: Kairon on June 29, 2006, 11:17:10 AM
Sadly, Sony should've probably just done this from the get-go. A Portable PSOne with its one screen and handheld would've probably been cheaper and sold faster.

~Carmine M. Red
Kairon@aol.com
Title: RE: ITT: PSP Discussion
Post by: Ceric on June 29, 2006, 12:20:28 PM
Fun thought.  By the time this Gen is over there is a good chance that Broadband would have reached a point where downloading Cube games wouldn't be that unheard of.  Also that compression will be better.  Thinking about it.  I'm pretty sure that with the extra horsepower that a PSP has compared to a PSOne Sony could probably do some good amount of compression on each of the games.  Maybe even shrinking them dramatically.  Especially when you reencode some of the media.  Media encoding has gotten much better and producing smaller files across the board.
Title: RE: ITT: PSP Discussion
Post by: Infernal Monkey on June 29, 2006, 10:41:58 PM
I can't wait to play FFVII on PSP, it's the perfect portable game.
Title: RE: ITT: PSP Discussion
Post by: BlackNMild2k1 on July 04, 2006, 09:48:09 AM
How far is Sony willing to go to ensure that thier products turn their customers away?
I'm not sure but I'm willing to bet that this ad is a little too close to the edge...

Sony Uses UnIntentional(?) Racism To Advertise PSP?

I'm sure its very unintentional but you gotta admit that there were much better ways to get thier point across that the white version of PSP is coming out. By having a white woman in all white wearing one white glove dominantly supress a black woman in all black by grabbing her by the face and forcing her to look up seems a little too bold even for Sony.
I'm not sure of the exact point they are trying to get across, but aren't these products supposed to complement each other and not have one be superior to the other? I mean they are still both just PSP's but the white one has to be shown as better than the black one? I thought thier enemies were the iPod and the DS, not each other.
Title: RE: ITT: PSP Discussion
Post by: stevey on July 04, 2006, 11:09:18 AM
This isn't new remember the old ads
Title: RE: ITT: PSP Discussion
Post by: BlackNMild2k1 on July 04, 2006, 11:14:44 AM
Its one thing to play on racial stereotypes, its something else completely to push "white supremacy".
And this is coming from a Japanese company too, how ironic...
Title: RE: ITT: PSP Discussion
Post by: KDR_11k on July 04, 2006, 09:51:58 PM
I think a Japanese company once advertised heaters made by some german company by having a picture of Hitler on the ad.
Title: RE:ITT: PSP Discussion
Post by: Kairon on July 04, 2006, 10:38:52 PM
Quote

Originally posted by: BlackNMild2k1
Its one thing to play on racial stereotypes, its something else completely to push "white supremacy".
And this is coming from a Japanese company too, how ironic...


Haven't you heard? Yellow's the new white!

<---- brown

~Carmine M. Red
Kairon@aol.com
Title: RE: ITT: PSP Discussion
Post by: nitsu niflheim on July 05, 2006, 04:03:54 AM
I don't see a point other than to get attention.  And Sony has been very dumb with its advertising lately, the cartoon PSP commercials, and the crown of thorns ad, pathetic.
Title: RE: ITT: PSP Discussion
Post by: BlackNMild2k1 on July 05, 2006, 06:25:47 AM
Well Sony has responded to the claims of "racism", and even though they deny everything, the ad is still in poor taste.
At least they aren't releasing those ads anywhere other than the Netherlands, thats gotta tell you they knew it was inappropriate on some level.

Eurogamer
Quote

"The marketing campaign for the launch of the White PSP in the Benelux focuses on the contrast between the Black PSP model and the new Ceramic white PSP model, and have no other message or purpose."


They should have stuck with these two ads instead
Title: RE: ITT: PSP Discussion
Post by: Athrun Zala on July 05, 2006, 07:08:21 AM
is it just me or we can assume that Sony will screw up on even days? oO
Title: RE: ITT: PSP Discussion
Post by: KDR_11k on July 05, 2006, 09:19:54 AM
You make it sound like they don't screw up on odd days.
Title: RE: ITT: PSP Discussion
Post by: Smash_Brother on July 05, 2006, 10:37:14 AM
Wow, I'd almost go as far to say that Sony is following Akklaim's footsteps by trying to use advertising which is shocking in the hopes of garnering attention.

We all know how well that strategy worked for Akklaim...
Title: RE: ITT: PSP Discussion
Post by: stevey on July 19, 2006, 03:58:40 PM
The stupidest thing sony did since yesterday

because the umd movie sold so amazingly at $40 their selling memory stick movies for $60 and $100 each in a lower resolution then the umd one... are they trying to run them selfs into the ground or what?
Title: RE:ITT: PSP Discussion
Post by: Arbok on July 19, 2006, 07:13:32 PM
Quote

Originally posted by: stevey
The stupidest thing sony did since yesterday

because the umd movie sold so amazingly at $40 their selling memory stick movies for $60 and $100 each in a lower resolution then the umd one... are they trying to run them selfs into the ground or what?


What I love is that they selected like the four worst movies possible to give that treatment to first. SWAT, XXX: State of the Union? No thanks...  
Title: RE:ITT: PSP Discussion
Post by: wandering on July 19, 2006, 09:22:32 PM
A bit late, but....
Quote

Originally posted by: BlackNMild2k1
How far is Sony willing to go to ensure that thier products turn their customers away?
I'm not sure but I'm willing to bet that this ad is a little too close to the edge...

Sony Uses UnIntentional(?) Racism To Advertise PSP?

What the hell is Sony smoking?

I guess I can kind of see the twisted logic that went into this. "hey, let's have a white girl represent the white PSP and a black girl represent the black PSP. And let's give them a friendly rivalry. And since the white is the newer model, let's have her kind of dominate the black one..."

Of course, this is assuming good faith. They could've, instead, been thinking "haha, you know what would really drum up some interest? A blatantly racist ad!" or "Hey, a lot of people in this country hate black people, right? How can we use that?"